SternFanNetwork Archive > Show Talk > SFN's Darkside Note: This is a Text only archive. Go directly to the real forum. BubbA GOT owned by Glen the Republican - Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics banner Pages: [1] 2 3  BubbA GOT owned by Glen the Republican - Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics Ironpirate Wow after listening to Bubba just now, I lost a lot of respect for him. Hatred of Bush has made them ignorant. You say 69% dissaprove of Bush in all of America, but its a poll of a 1,000 people. Approval rating fluxuate all the time, when hes % goes up to 50% what will you say then? The media is liberal is a proven fact. You name a couple of people and papers and act like it even. Way to stand up Glen, fuck liberals, lol. fixedhate Yea I didn't like that whole call.. The caller was boring and just pissing off the whole crew. Ironpirate you can just feel the hate they had and its sad. WillowGlen Keep spinning mabye Hannity needs an intern. Unless you like getting fucked in the ass with a loofa. Then I would suggest applying at Oreilly. jlohlinger Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate Wow after listening to Bubba just now, I lost a lot of respect for him. Hatred of Bush has made them ignorant. You say 69% dissaprove of Bush in all of America, but its a poll of a 1,000 people. Approval rating fluxuate all the time, when hes % goes up to 50% what will you say then? The media is liberal is a proven fact. You name a couple of people and papers and act like it even. Way to stand up Glen, fuck liberals, lol. So this is the Iron Pirate "Why I lost respect for Bubba thread?" :D stahrr5150 bubba's got free pass......he's just not in to politics...... but brent suprises me.........as a former marine... WillowGlen Why? Dont you think Marines can think for themselves? Ironpirate yeah, he's not into politics but he acts like he knows everything and is stuck in he liberal thinking now from his friends. There is 2 sides of every story and they just want to hear there side. stahrr5150 yeah but marines blinded by hatred is just fucked up...... WillowGlen Sometimes "hatred" is well deserved. stahrr5150 not when it's born from straight lies dude....... warrengtype what lies? I'd enjoy dubunking any and all you can dig up. stahrr5150 we could be here awhile....... Ironpirate That would have gone the same if I would have called the show, Glen is my twin and my hero. :) warrengtype Ok fine, we don't have to get into an argument or anything, but these "lies" I'm sure are at the very least debatable. WillowGlen So retards can have twins? Good thing Gary the retard and Wendy never hooked up. BigButtaBallz Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate Wow after listening to Bubba just now, I lost a lot of respect for him. Hatred of Bush has made them ignorant. You say 69% dissaprove of Bush in all of America, but its a poll of a 1,000 people. Approval rating fluxuate all the time, when hes % goes up to 50% what will you say then? The media is liberal is a proven fact. You name a couple of people and papers and act like it even. Way to stand up Glen, fuck liberals, lol. I'm sure Bubba is all broken up about your loss of respect. kali does it really matter what the percentages are? bush has been an incompetant asshat for years - long before he was "appointed" pres. he's done a horrible "job", making a huge mess of this country. just sayin' :hw: hello to jlohlinger and his sexy balloon knot! kali btw, has anyone else noticed that it's 6:59PM eastern time but the time on the board says 9:59PM???? what the heck happened? asshat Two words: Dan Rather. Surveys of journalists’ self-reported voting habits show them backing the Democratic candidate in every presidential election since 1964, including landslide losers George McGovern, Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis. In 2004, a poll conducted by the University of Connecticut found journalists backed John Kerry over George W. Bush by a greater than two-to-one margin. http://www.mediaresearch.org/biasbasics/biasbasics3.asp Compared to their audiences, journalists are far more likely to say they are Democrats or liberals, and they espouse liberal positions on a wide variety of issues. A 2004 poll by the Pew Research Center for The People & The Press found five times more journalists described themselves as “liberal” as said they were “conservative.” http://www.mediaresearch.org/biasbasics/biasbasics.asp A number of journalists have admitted that the majority of their brethren approach the news from a liberal angle. During the 2004 presidential campaign, for example, Newsweek’s Evan Thomas predicted that sympathetic media coverage would boost Kerry’s vote by “maybe 15 points,” which he later revised to five points. In 2005, ex-CBS News President Van Gordon Sauter confessed he stopped watching his old network: “The unremitting liberal orientation finally became too much for me.” http://www.mediaresearch.org/biasba...2admissions.asp Then there's the study by UCLA last year which concluded that of the 20 major media outlets studied, 18 scored left of center, with CBS' "Evening News," The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times ranking second, third and fourth most liberal behind the news pages of The Wall Street Journal. http://www.newsroom.ucla.edu/page.asp?RelNum=6664 Then there's this study from 2004 that shows that roughly 75 percent of the stories about the Democratic presidential candidates were positive. For Bush, they were 60-plus percent negative. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Conte...04/143lkblo.asp Ignorance is bliss, I suppose. stahrr5150 Quote: Originally posted by asshat Two words: Dan Rather. Surveys of journalists’ self-reported voting habits show them backing the Democratic candidate in every presidential election since 1964, including landslide losers George McGovern, Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis. In 2004, a poll conducted by the University of Connecticut found journalists backed John Kerry over George W. Bush by a greater than two-to-one margin. http://www.mediaresearch.org/biasbasics/biasbasics3.asp Compared to their audiences, journalists are far more likely to say they are Democrats or liberals, and they espouse liberal positions on a wide variety of issues. A 2004 poll by the Pew Research Center for The People & The Press found five times more journalists described themselves as “liberal” as said they were “conservative.” http://www.mediaresearch.org/biasbasics/biasbasics.asp A number of journalists have admitted that the majority of their brethren approach the news from a liberal angle. During the 2004 presidential campaign, for example, Newsweek’s Evan Thomas predicted that sympathetic media coverage would boost Kerry’s vote by “maybe 15 points,” which he later revised to five points. In 2005, ex-CBS News President Van Gordon Sauter confessed he stopped watching his old network: “The unremitting liberal orientation finally became too much for me.” http://www.mediaresearch.org/biasba...2admissions.asp Then there's the study by UCLA last year which concluded that of the 20 major media outlets studied, 18 scored left of center, with CBS' "Evening News," The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times ranking second, third and fourth most liberal behind the news pages of The Wall Street Journal. http://www.newsroom.ucla.edu/page.asp?RelNum=6664 Then there's this study from 2004 that shows that roughly 75 percent of the stories about the Democratic presidential candidates were positive. For Bush, they were 60-plus percent negative. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Conte...04/143lkblo.asp Ignorance is bliss, I suppose. asshat Quote: Originally posted by kali ....long before he was "appointed" pres. I think you lost any credibility of having your opinion interpreted objectively right around this part. WillowGlen I love how you quote strories from NEOCON schill sites like the Weekly Standard and Media search as some sort of facts. That like saying it must be true because Brit Hume said so on Fox. warrengtype And those polls of a thousand people? If you've ever participated in ANY kind of poll, you'd know that once you get to that high of a number, the percentage will not change drastically after that. Here's a little bit I found from msnbc: POLLS Journalists use polls to gauge what the public is thinking. The most statistically accurate picture is captured by using a randomly selected sample of individuals within the group that is being targeted, typically adult Americans. While a poll of 100 people will be more accurate than a poll of 10, studies have shown that accuracy begins to improve less at about 500 people and increases only a minor amount beyond 1,000 people. So, in the case of that NBC-WSJ poll, only 2,005 adults were surveyed by the polling organizations of Peter D. Hart and Robert M. Teeter. The poll was conducted by telephone and had a margin of error of plus or minus 2.2 percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level. The confidence level means that if the same poll were conducted 100 times, each one randomly selecting the people polled, only five of the polls would be expected to yield results outside the margin of error. Random selection of those polled is necessary to ensure a broad representation of the population at large. For example, a nationwide poll asking which NBA team is the best would likely yield a far different answer in Philadelphia than in Los Angeles. (And neither one would be a good sample of the population at large.) In the NBC-WSJ survey, pollsters first randomly selected a number of geographic areas and then telephone numbers were generated in a way that allowed all numbers in those areas (both listed and unlisted) an equal chance to be called. Only one adult in each household was then selected to answer the poll. While variation can occur depending on what questions are asked and how they are asked, similar questions tend to yield similar answers. One way to account for variation, however, is to ask the same question over a period of time. Of course approval ratings will fluxuate, but Bush's have been on a steady decline for some time now. Even Tucker Carlson agreed to this. stahrr5150 most of what he said was echoing what brent or manson had just said steelrfn The members of the show said some of them were even former republicans, their complaint is with the completely big business backed, big oil owned, unqualified moron we currently have in the white house and the horrible job the republicans have done while in control of washington. I, at this point do not even see where either point is debatable. asshat Quote: Originally posted by WillowGlen I love how you quote strories from NEOCON schill sites like the Weekly Standard and Media search as some sort of facts. That like saying it must be true because Brit Hume said so on Fox. Instead of criticizing the fact that I bothered to do some research, how about you find your own and post the results here. Using only proven unbiased sources, or course. That or you could stick to that age-old liberal mantra of bitch when things aren't right, but offer no better solution to fix them. Ready, set, go! asshat Quote: Originally posted by warrengtype And those polls of a thousand people? If you've ever participated in ANY kind of poll, you'd know that once you get to that high of a number, the percentage will not change drastically after that. Here's a little bit I found from msnbc: POLLS Journalists use polls to gauge what the public is thinking. The most statistically accurate picture is captured by using a randomly selected sample of individuals within the group that is being targeted, typically adult Americans. While a poll of 100 people will be more accurate than a poll of 10, studies have shown that accuracy begins to improve less at about 500 people and increases only a minor amount beyond 1,000 people. So, in the case of that NBC-WSJ poll, only 2,005 adults were surveyed by the polling organizations of Peter D. Hart and Robert M. Teeter. The poll was conducted by telephone and had a margin of error of plus or minus 2.2 percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level. The confidence level means that if the same poll were conducted 100 times, each one randomly selecting the people polled, only five of the polls would be expected to yield results outside the margin of error. Random selection of those polled is necessary to ensure a broad representation of the population at large. For example, a nationwide poll asking which NBA team is the best would likely yield a far different answer in Philadelphia than in Los Angeles. (And neither one would be a good sample of the population at large.) In the NBC-WSJ survey, pollsters first randomly selected a number of geographic areas and then telephone numbers were generated in a way that allowed all numbers in those areas (both listed and unlisted) an equal chance to be called. Only one adult in each household was then selected to answer the poll. While variation can occur depending on what questions are asked and how they are asked, similar questions tend to yield similar answers. One way to account for variation, however, is to ask the same question over a period of time. Of course approval ratings will fluxuate, but Bush's have been on a steady decline for some time now. Even Tucker Carlson agreed to this. I think a poll sampling of 1000 people is a good enough amount to get accurate results. The question is, what were the demographics used when finding those 1000 people. Was the sampling taken from a predominantly liberal/conservative area, wealthy/poor communities, military/non-military communities, etc. I'd like to see that info. kali Quote: Originally posted by asshat I think you lost any credibility of having your opinion interpreted objectively right around this part. i'm suggesting we really DON'T know for sure what the hell has been going on in this country for years. the media has not been doing their job. politians have not been doing their job. they are mostly in the pockets of corporations. and many voters have not been doing their civic duty. thsi used to be a great country, but now it's just all about money. sad. asshat Quote: Originally posted by steelrfn I, at this point do not even see where either point is debatable. Well, thats at least half of your problem right there. asshat Quote: Originally posted by kali i'm suggesting we really DON'T know fro sure what the hell has been going on in thsi country for years. the media has not been doing their job. politians have not been doing their job. they are mostly in the pockets of corporations. and many voters have not been doing their civic duty. thsi used to be a great country, but now it's just all about money. sad. I think I can agree with you on just about all of that. kali Quote: Originally posted by asshat I think I can agree with you on just about all of that. i've been saying this - and alot more - in the political forum before the 2004 "election", and all can feel at this point is that I have been proven right over and over. and it's just too too horrible. jlohlinger Quote: Originally posted by kali does it really matter what the percentages are? bush has been an incompetant asshat for years - long before he was "appointed" pres. he's done a horrible "job", making a huge mess of this country. just sayin' :hw: hello to jlohlinger and his sexy balloon knot! Hey kali... glad to see you're back... try switching your time to Pacific in the user cp>edit options... it worked for me... :hw: Ironpirate i love this thread warrengtype Quote: Originally posted by asshat Instead of criticizing the fact that I bothered to do some research, how about you find your own and post the results here. Using only proven unbiased sources, or course. That or you could stick to that age-old liberal mantra of bitch when things aren't right, but offer no better solution to fix them. Ready, set, go! Yeah but you didn't really prove anything in your post. Only that some statistics have shown that media members may be more often liberal than not. So? The higher educated people of the world tend to be more liberal. (And that's not a knock against anyone, it's just the way it is) Most guys at the top of the media game are world traveled learn-ed type dudes. That's just the way it's always been. Everyone knows that. It doesn't mean they're LYING. There was no proof anywhere that in any of that which proved they're lying about anything. Liberal spin? Maybe, but that's not lying. It's just a different viewpoint than yours. And quite frankly, the people who matter know the difference. We're not as blind and dumb as you'd like to think. Ironpirate you have" John Kerry Jr right next to you" was fucking classic kali Quote: Originally posted by jlohlinger Hey kali... glad to see you're back... try switching your time to Pacific in the user cp>edit options... it worked for me... :hw: i'm keeping away from my stalkers, thanks! (and wanted to see you) I know I CAN change my time (that's easy), I just don't understand what happened. At one point it was only an hour off. how weird!!!:ae: warrengtype Quote: Originally posted by asshat I think a poll sampling of 1000 people is a good enough amount to get accurate results. The question is, what were the demographics used when finding those 1000 people. Was the sampling taken from a predominantly liberal/conservative area, wealthy/poor communities, military/non-military communities, etc. I'd like to see that info. That's awfully paranoid. You think there's a huge conspiracy so vast that they're ONLY polling liberal people? Come on, man. Next you'll tell me that the moon landing was faked, Elvis and Jim Morrison are alive, There was a second shooter in the grassy knoll, and there's a hanger in Arizona with dead aliens from the 50's. asshat Quote: Originally posted by warrengtype Yeah but you didn't really prove anything in your post. Only that some statistics have shown that media members may be more often liberal than not. So? The higher educated people of the world tend to be more liberal. (And that's not a knock against anyone, it's just the way it is) Most guys at the top of the media game are world traveled learn-ed type dudes. That's just the way it's always been. Everyone knows that. It doesn't mean they're LYING. There was no proof anywhere that in any of that which proved they're lying about anything. Liberal spin? Maybe, but that's not lying. It's just a different viewpoint than yours. And quite frankly, the people who matter know the difference. We're not as blind and dumb as you'd like to think. Nice opinion. Got any facts with that? Lying and slanting are two different things. If cops shoot and kill a suspect, lets say he's a cashier for starbucks, that is about to pull a weapon on them and the headline reads "COPS MURDER CASHIER AT STARBUCKS" the next day.... Well... thats not "lying", but it damned sure isn't offering an ubiased viewpoint either. Believe it or not, it is entirely possible to skew someones views by never lying to them, but only giving them a single, slanted opinion on matters. I realize that studying and researching is difficult, but have some Wheaties and sprinkle a little effort on them tomorrow morning. stahrr5150 paranoid? that's reality in this day and age.......it's called corruption......hidden agendas......greed asshat Quote: Originally posted by warrengtype That's awfully paranoid. You think there's a huge conspiracy so vast that they're ONLY polling liberal people? Come on, man. Next you'll tell me that the moon landing was faked, Elvis and Jim Morrison are alive, There was a second shooter in the grassy knoll, and there's a hanger in Arizona with dead aliens from the 50's. Show me where I said they were only polling liberals. You're just all eat up with the stupid aren't you, son? warrengtype Quote: Originally posted by asshat I realize that studying and researching is difficult, but have some Wheaties and sprinkle a little effort on them tomorrow morning. Again, you proved NOTHING which was relevant to this particular conversation. You only screamed and cried that the media disagrees with you. But there was not one single fact in all that horsecrap which proved any journalist lied. Try again. warrengtype Quote: Originally posted by stahrr5150 paranoid? that's reality in this day and age.......it's called corruption......hidden agendas......greed Haha. Isn't that what you're upset with liberals over? Saying that Bush is doing just that? You can't have your cake and eat it too. I guess only the liberal bastards are capable of that sort of thing. Come. On. Grow up, people. It's this kind of extremism that's fucking up everything. warrengtype Quote: Originally posted by asshat Show me where I said they were only polling liberals. You're just all eat up with the stupid aren't you, son? So much for intelligent discourse. You implied it. At the very least you questioned the integrity of the poll. That may not have been saying it directly, but we both know what you meant. steelrfn Still a JR member, so I gotta make a couple of points in my one window: 1) asshat, you da man, that last line is too good. I bow before your superior ability 2) I fail to see how Bush got elected, (as governor OR president) based on his record, he and his brother, (How in the HELL did they govern different states BTW), made it via name recognition by his dad. and finally: 3) The mistakes made by this administration are so many and so great that I cannot see how a rational person could interpret it as anything but total mismanagement and failure. warrengtype Quote: Originally posted by steelrfn asshat, you da man, that last line is too good. I bow before your superior ability Haha, were you being sarcastic? Cause if not the rest of your post is kinda confusing. Bhickman Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate You say 69% dissaprove of Bush in all of America, but its a poll of a 1,000 people. Approval rating fluxuate all the time That's a random 1,000 people. And his ratings haven't been fluctuating for long periods of time...he's only been sinking lower and lower over the past year. Nice how you try to put a spin on the fact that people have finally woken up to the fact that Bush has bottomed out America just like he did on every other opportunity he had. stahrr5150 news flash.....corruption and hidden agendas exist on both sides of the aisle......i'm not singling out any one party........that's all i'm sayin..... warrengtype Quote: Originally posted by stahrr5150 news flash.....corruption and hidden agendas exist on both sides of the aisle......i'm not singling out any one party........that's all i'm sayin..... Fair enough. I can respect that. What pisses me off is this whole hardline stance where "my" party is never wrong, and "yours" is always wrong. The big fat retarded Rush Limbaugh's and Mike Moore's of the world. They do nothing but make the world's problems worse. whitemic BULLSHIT Bubba and Brent made Glen look like an uneducated ass fuck.... stahrr5150 agreed Ironpirate Glen for president Ironpirate whats hes website Bhickman Mods: Keep an eye on Ironpirate. stahrr5150 why would you say that??hickman Ironpirate keep an eye on my cock? warrengtype Quote: Originally posted by Bhickman Mods: Keep an eye on Ironpirate. I don't know, I like his avatar. Blanka would be a master of shocking puss. stahrr5150 that's right....keep an eye on anybody with a brain......... fuckin douche....... Ironpirate please keep on a eye on me because I disagree with you on political matters, very smart steelrfn I was marking out to Asshats putdown ability, (I still disagreed with his point, though) I just had to cram it all into one post. It looks like everyone pretty much agrees that the current situation is a mess and the disagreement is on which party will/can fix it. My money BTW is on either, or more specifically both. It looks to me like when either party gets control of congress and the white house we are all in for the back door jones. Our best bet is to elect someone outside the party structure and let them throw some light on those cockroaches that are driving this country into the toilet. StonedHurricane Glens website was the rocket report (not too impressive) http://www.therocketreport.com If you want to know who made an ass out of themselves today it was Keith Olbermann. During his rant about Bill O'Reilly he said that O'Reilly likes to embellesh his ratings, while conveniently not mentioning HIS ratings. So I decided to look them up. My first google search turned up an interesting article about Olbermann and O'Reilly and thier ratings. Here is the article from the LA Daily News. Olbermann's ratings get a major boost from O'Reilly factor, cheeky take on news http://www.dailynews.com/ontv/ci_3662356 This is a fluff piece about Olbermann (and how great he is) and they give credit to his O'Reilly bashing for his beating CNN in the ratings. They admit, however, that O'Reilly brings in 5 TIMES the viewers including twice the number in the prime advertising demo. (I guess that's why Olbermann didn't mention his ratings on the show today) There is also a quote from Olbermann about why they don't have debates on his show (It's always him and another liberal bashing any and all conservatives). He admits, "Part of my deal with the network is that I don't have to have debates. The idea that 'balance' is always fair is absolutely false. If I say there's an 800-pound elephant or 800-pound donkey, depending on your politics in the room, and someone else says, 'No, there isn't,' one person can be right and one can be objectively wrong. Having both sides politically debating a point adds nothing to the political discourse; plus, it makes me queasy." Huh?? I thought that was THE POINT of liberalism, being open to others viewpoints even if they disagree with you. I agree with him that someone can be objectively right or objectively wrong, but don't you have to have the other person in the room? The fact that he negotiated his deal with a clause that he never has to have people with opposing viewpoints on the show is unbelievable. What does Olbermann have to hide from? The truth maybe? Ironpirate Quote: I thought that was THE POINT of liberalism, being open to others viewpoints even if they disagree with you. only point they have is up there ass :cool: warrengtype Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate only point they have is up there ass :cool: Well, I suppose when you've been up in as many men's asses as you have, you begin to get a good idea of what's in 'em. warrengtype Quote: Originally posted by StonedHurricane If you want to know who made an ass out of themselves today it was Keith Olbermann. During his rant about Bill O'Reilly he said that O'Reilly likes to embellesh his ratings, while conveniently not mentioning HIS ratings. So I decided to look them up.[/B] I didn't hear this part of the show, but did Olbermann claim or imply his ratings were bigger than O'Reillys? If so I could see a point of making a big deal about it, if not then it seems like a lot fuss over nothing. BonswanaMiliken My least favorite part of The Bubba The Lovesponge Show is when Bubba, Brent and crew talk politics. George Bush is an asshole but you can not sound intelligent when you blame every problem in America on George Bush and the religious right. Ironpirate Quote: My least favorite part of The Bubba The Lovesponge Show is when Bubba, Brent and crew talk politics. George Bush is an asshole but you can not sound intelligent when you blame every problem in America on George Bush and the religious right. ding ding ding, we have a winner StonedHurricane Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate only point they have is up there ass :cool: It's just so amazing that Olbermann is so anti-Bush and anti-Republican yet he refuses to defend any of his positons (and signed a contract that makes sure he doesn't have to). O'Reilly makes every effort to debate ALL of his opponents and takes on all comers because he knows that his ideas can be defended. He's debated Michael Moore, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Harry Belafonte, Al Franken, HOWARD STERN, among others. He's not afraid to defend his ideas!! Olbermann is a coward who makes wisecracks about Republicans nonstop on his show yet doesn't have the balls to debate them. He made an ass out of himself today on the show. warrengtype Quote: Originally posted by StonedHurricane It's just so amazing that Olbermann is so anti-Bush and anti-Republican yet he refuses to defend any of his positons (and signed a contract that makes sure he doesn't have to). I can agree with this. I don't watch Olbermann and never have. Honestly I'm not a fan of 90% those kinda guys and gals. If they're on TV screaming about how ALL conservatives/liberals are idiots then they're not worth my time. Because they're lying scumbags who only serve to widen the gap between Americans. Quote: O'Reilly makes every effort to debate ALL of his opponents and takes on all comers because he knows that his ideas can be defended. He's debated Michael Moore, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Harry Belafonte, Al Franken, HOWARD STERN, among others. He's not afraid to defend his ideas!! This makes me chuckle. O'Reilly is a bully. He doesn't debate, he shouts people down and turns off their mics. Although I'd pay a million dollars to see him and Franken get in a ring and box it out. Plus I happen to think he's mostly full of shit. But that's just my opinion. I do have respect for Tucker Carlson, though. Especially after hearing him on Bubba's show. I don't agree with him on a lot of things, but he's a sensible enough guy. kgc498 Here is my opinion on the subject ( if anyone cares). I don't tune into Bubba's show to hear politics, whether I agree with them or not. So when they start talking politics I go to some other channel and keep checking back until they're done. Lush Rimbaugh About 3 months ago I swear I heard Bubba say he voted for Bush. jlohlinger Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate only point they have is up there ass :cool: Up where ass? :D Ironpirate do i need to shove a ballon up your ass? MNSternfan No one got owned in that segment, they all came off sounding frustrated and catty. momo111 Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate do i need to shove a ballon up your ass? Learn that trick from your mother? She loves sneaking coke into prison for her pimp. Ironpirate better to hide it in your ass right momo momo111 Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate better to hide it in your ass right momo Probably not, I'm not going to visit your mom's pimp. Miller Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate better to hide it in your ass right momo Dude...you want to hide things in momo's ass??!?!?!?!?!?!? I didn't realize the republican party supported this issue? Garvej This thread drew me out of the woodwork. BonswanaMiliken I agree with you completely...I love the Bubba show but when they start talking politics that is where I become disinterested. Blaming all the problems on the president/party-in-charge is always the easy way out no matter who is in office. That being said, I can see Bubba's ire with the Republican party and the religious right because of how he got fucked over by the FCC. The religious right and the radical left are killing this country. momo111 Quote: Originally posted by Miller Dude...you want to hide things in momo's ass??!?!?!?!?!?!? I didn't realize the republican party supported this issue? He's not a republican, he's part of the rainbow coalition. Miller Quote: Originally posted by momo111 He's not a republican, he's part of the rainbow coalition. Either way he seems interested in your anal vapor. I have a feeling he wants to pop your cherry. Ironpirate wow a comedian thats not funny, what are the odds... I guess your in Nambla that rapes little boys? momo111 :beret: Perhaps I should romance him first. momo111 Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate wow a comedian thats not funny, what are the odds... I gues your in Nambla that rapes little kids? You should know, your not only a member, but the president. Ironpirate im sure that cherry has been popped numerous times momo111 Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate im sure that cherry has been popped numerous times Well, I fucked your mom up the ass a couple of times if that counts? :( Ironpirate Quote: "I'll never forget what a pompous bloated lying piece of shit this guy is..... he's a fucking blow hard cocksucker who doesn't give a damn about anyone but himself. " ~ momo111 on Lush Rimbaugh so your just a cocksucker then? Miller Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate wow a comedian thats not funny, what are the odds... I guess your in Nambla that rapes little boys? Are you heading their recruiting efforts this year? Please explain what you are selling. Ironpirate anal beads? Miller Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate so your just a cocksucker then? are you getting turned on? warrengtype Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate wow a comedian thats not funny, what are the odds... I guess your in Nambla that rapes little boys? Is anyone at all surprised that a guy with such impeccable grammar is a GWB fan? Birds of a feather, and all that jazz. jlohlinger Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate im sure that cherry has been popped numerous times That is probably single handedly the most ignorant ass fucked comment I've ever seen made.... you have to be a virgin if you don't know a cherry can only be popped once... what a fuckin' fag... :lol: Miller Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate anal beads? do you like white or dark chocolate on them? momo111 Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate so your just a cocksucker then? That almost makes sense. All that cock thats been pumped up your ass has you thinking of nothing but cock. Well, here you go. :blowjob: Ironpirate Quote: That is probably single handedly the most ignorant ass fucked comment I've ever seen made.... you have to be a virgin if you don't know a cherry can only be popped once... what a fuckin' fag. no shit, do they have a cherry in there ass too, lol smuck momo111 Quote: Originally posted by jlohlinger That is probably single handedly the most ignorant ass fucked comment I've ever seen made.... you have to be a virgin if you don't know a cherry can only be popped once... what a fuckin' fag... :lol: His only a virgin if you don't count five year olds. Sick fuck. Ironpirate you guys trying to gang rape me, because this isnt the way into my pants warrengtype Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate no shit, do they have a cherry in there ass too, lol smuck What the fuck is a smuck? God you're retarded. Please don't reproduce. Ironpirate yeah im a virgin, lol momo111 Quote: Originally posted by Ironpirate you guys trying to gang rape, because ths isnt the way into my pants We know already, to get into your pants we need a five year old, and a record of "The wheels on the Bus." Ironpirate Jack nuts smuck nizzle 4 up, 8 down an ass clown with hair on it's neezey fizzle on it's nazzle

Your Ad Here

Powered by: Search Engine Indexer and vBulletin v2.3.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2002, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
All code and concepts property of iMonkey Inc.

This website is not affiliated with the Howard Stern Show. It is produced by fans for fans.
We share no connection with Howard Stern, Sirius Radio, On Demand, CBS Broadcasting, E! TV or Infinity Broadcasting.

All posts and attachments are the responsibilities of their owners and not of this site.