|
Note: This is a Text only archive. Go directly to the real forum.
Urgent Letter from Dennis Kucinich
- Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
banner
| Urgent Letter from Dennis Kucinich
- Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
|
| FatesWebb |
http://kucinich.us/archive/report/d...26+18%3A56%3A49
Bush Administration Plans for a US War vs. Iran
Urgent Letter from Dennis Kucinich
September 26, 2006 6:56 pm ET
Dear Friends,
The Bush Administration is preparing for war against Iran, using an almost identical drumbeat of weapons of mass destruction, imminent threat, alleged links to Al Qaeda, and even linking Iran with a future 911.
In the past few months, reports have been published in Newsweek, ABC News, and GQ Magazine that indicate the US is recruiting members of paramilitary groups to destabilize Iran through violence. The New Yorker magazine and the Guardian have written that the US has already deployed military inside Iran. The latest issue of Time writes of plans for a naval blockade of Iran at the Strait of Hormuz, through which 40% of the world's oil supply passes. Other news reports have claimed that an air strike, using a variety of bombs, including bunker busters, to be dropped on over 1,000 targets, including nuclear facilities. This could obviously result in a great long-term humanitarian and environmental disaster.
Earlier this year, I demanded congressional hearings on Iran and was able to secure the promise of a classified briefing from the Department of Defense, the State Department, and the CIA. When the briefing was held, the Department of Defense and the State Department refused to show and are continuing to block any congressional inquiry into plans to attack Iran.
Just this past week, the International Atomic Energy Agency called "erroneous, misleading, and unsubstantiated" statements relating to Iran's nuclear program which came from a staff report of the House Intelligence committee. Other intelligence officials have claimed over a dozen distortions in the report, which, among other things, said Iran is producing weapons grade uranium. The Washington Post wrote: "The IAEA called that 'incorrect,' noting that weapons grade uranium is enriched to a level of 90 percent or more. Iran has enriched uranium to 3.5% under IAEA monitoring."
I have demanded that the Government Oversight subcommittee on National Security and International Relations, of which I am the ranking Democrat, hold hearings to determine how in the world the Director of National Intelligence, John Negroponte, viewed the report without correcting the obvious inaccuracies before it was published. Once again, a case for war is being built on lies.
You will recall that four and a half years ago I warned this nation about the deception behind the buildup to war against Iraq. Everything I said then turned out to be 100% right. I led 125 Democrats in opposing the Iraq war resolution in March of 2003. The very same people who brought us Iraq in 2003 are getting ready to bring us a war against Iran.
With your help, I will lead the way to challenge the Bush Administration's march to war against Iran. Please support my campaign for re-election with a generous donation to help continue my work in the Congress. The plan to attack Iran, on its face, threatens the safety of every US soldier serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, not to mention the countless Iranian lives at risk and the threat to world peace and environmental catastrophes.
With your support, I intend to continue to insist upon:
(1) Direct negotiations with Iran.
(2) The US must guarantee Iran and the world community that it will not attack Iran.
(3) Iran must open once again to international inspections of its nuclear program.
(4) Iran must agree not to build nuclear weapons.
Many of you joined me three years ago as I ran for President to challenge the deliberate lies about WMDs, Iraq and 911, Iraq and Al Qaeda, and the Niger "yellowcake" claims which put us onto the path of an unnecessary, illegal, costly war in Iraq. The Iraq war has caused greater instability and violence in the world community. In the meantime, our government has used the oxymoronic war on terror to trample our Constitution, rip up the Bill of Rights, and rule by fear.
Please join with me as we continue our efforts for the end of fear and the beginning of hope, for international dialogue, for cooperation, and for peace.
Thank you,
Dennis |
|
|
| Creekdog |
Is he implying we shouldnt trust the government?
Why is it that every thread that starts with "Urgent" somehow winds up asking for money. |
|
|
| Crusader76 |
So we need to promise that we'll never attack them, THEN they'll force them to agree to international inspections and get them to agree to not build nuclear weapons?
Flawless logic threre :rolleyes:
There are no immediate plans to invade Iran. No one wants that war. But you never take the use of force off the table, not when it comes to issue of national security. And a nuclear beligerant Iran is a threat to our security and the safety of the Europe. |
|
|
| Oz |
Quote: Originally posted by Crusader76
So we need to promise that we'll never attack them, THEN they'll force them to agree to international inspections and get them to agree to not build nuclear weapons?
Flawless logic threre :rolleyes:
There are no immediate plans to invade Iran. No one wants that war. But you never take the use of force off the table, not when it comes to issue of national security. And a nuclear beligerant Iran is a threat to our security and the safety of the Europe. |
there are no plans for war with iran? whew, thank god you're able to post throught the firewall at the DoD |
|
|
| FatesWebb |
Quote: Originally posted by Crusader76
So we need to promise that we'll never attack them, THEN they'll force them to agree to international inspections and get them to agree to not build nuclear weapons?
Flawless logic threre :rolleyes:
There are no immediate plans to invade Iran. No one wants that war. But you never take the use of force off the table, not when it comes to issue of national security. And a nuclear beligerant Iran is a threat to our security and the safety of the Europe. |
yeah no shit, Oz, first off there have been plans for years.. http://www.newamericancentury.org/R...casDefenses.pdf
and secondly, if there are no plans for immediate war, then why do we have troops on the ground in IRAN? and why have we moved up the deployment of a major "strike group" of ships, including the nuclear aircraft carrier Eisenhower as well as a cruiser, destroyer, frigate, submarine escort and supply ship, to head for the Persian Gulf, just off Iran's western coast.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20061009/lindorff |
|
|
| Stonewall |
Who is this letter for? "Dear Friends"? Is it a message to the insurgents in Iraq to step up attacks? Is it just for U.S. troops fighting the enemy? A reminder of the illegal war? A reminder to those on our side that we cannot be trusted? That we will leave you so join the other side before it's too late?
Who are these "Dear Friends"? Iranians? A message to the Iranians that whatever they do they have friends in the U.S. that will counter any move that prevents Iran from it's goal? Don't worry Iran violate any treaty you want, do anything you want, we will watch your back?
Are these "Dear Friends" Americans? HAHAHAHAHAHA! Yeah, that is funny. |
|
|
| FatesWebb |
| he is a congressman, so friends means americans. of course, you BIGOTS dont count. (as americans) you and Daniel Carver can ignore the letter, you are not friends of America... |
|
|
| Stonewall |
Quote: Originally posted by FatesWebb
he is a congressman, so friends means americans. of course, you BIGOTS dont count. (as americans) you and Daniel Carver can ignore the letter, you are not friends of America... |
Really? The letter is meant for Americans? It does not say it's to Americans. It says "Dear Friends" then it turns into an anti-American rant. It could have been written by Al Qaeda or Iran, or N. Korea.
You are correct the letter is not to me... I'm not a friend of this.
Instead of writing a letter to his "friends" maybe he should join his friends, wherever cave they are living in these days.
Friends like these, who needs enemies? |
|
|
| FatesWebb |
Quote: Originally posted by Stonewall
Really? The letter is meant for Americans? It does not say it's to Americans. It says "Dear Friends" then it turns into an anti-American rant. It could have been written by Al Qaeda or Iran, or N. Korea.
You are correct the letter is not to me... I'm not a friend of this.
Instead of writing a letter to his "friends" maybe he should join his friends, wherever cave they are living in these days.
Friends like these, who needs enemies? |
so what is wrong with him?
he wants peace? or liberty? which is sooooo bad? |
|
|
| FatesWebb |
| bullshit, explain why please. your one of those if you disagree with war your a terrorist. huh... |
|
|
| Stonewall |
Quote: Originally posted by FatesWebb
bullshit, explain why please. your one of those if you disagree with war your a terrorist. huh... |
No.
This letter completely goes against America. The current war effort and it even goes so far as to inform Iran that the U.S. is going to attack. With no evidence of course.
I have an idea if the U.S. does not attack Iran than this individual should stand trial for Treason. In a time of war he is spreading rumour and could in fact bring on attacks against our troops.
This individual is accusing the U.S. of:
In the past few months, reports have been published in Newsweek, ABC News, and GQ Magazine that indicate the US is recruiting members of paramilitary groups to destabilize Iran through violence. The New Yorker magazine and the Guardian have written that the US has already deployed military inside Iran.
He is a Traitor. He takes these reports, which it would not surprise me if his "friends" leaked this information, if true, to these newspapers. He spreads it around.
If we in fact do have troops in Iran then this individual is giving them up. TREASON. |
|
|
| Stickman |
| Kucinich is one of the few thinking humans in Congress. Too bad he's totally unelectable as a presidential candidate. |
|
|
| FatesWebb |
Quote: Originally posted by Stonewall
No.
This letter completely goes against America. The current war effort and it even goes so far as to inform Iran that the U.S. is going to attack. With no evidence of course.
I have an idea if the U.S. does not attack Iran than this individual should stand trial for Treason. In a time of war he is spreading rumour and could in fact bring on attacks against our troops.
This individual is accusing the U.S. of:
In the past few months, reports have been published in Newsweek, ABC News, and GQ Magazine that indicate the US is recruiting members of paramilitary groups to destabilize Iran through violence. The New Yorker magazine and the Guardian have written that the US has already deployed military inside Iran.
He is a Traitor. He takes these reports, which it would not surprise me if his "friends" leaked this information, if true, to these newspapers. He spreads it around.
If we in fact do have troops in Iran then this individual is giving them up. TREASON. |
huh? why would the information need to be leaked? he is a congressman.
He is not a traitor, you idiot, lets talk about traitors for a minute.
you like to blame everything on islamics, as does our "leader". You even take it so far as to be obsessed with IslamoHate. However the first ammendment speaks of freedom of religion. So WHO'S the traitor now? Your bigotry is treason to the very foundation of America. The information that he speaks of isnt classified, IT WAS IN GQ MAGAZINE FOR ALLAHS SAKE!
You are the one that hates everything about America and the constitution. You would love to do away with Freedom of speech, Freedom of religion, and Freedom of press as this very post suggests, and that is just the first ammendment. You also support warrentless wiretapping, and war without justification. You support the fact that 9/11 is still blamed on muslims, when it is PROVEN that the official account about 19 hijackers is not only false but impossible. YET YOU STILL hate islamics. YOU ARE THE ONE THAT HAS FORSAKEN AMERICA! However because of people like Kunicinh, Stickman and I (see image)
(America will not forsake you.) |
|
|
| Stonewall |
FatesWebb,
Islam is not a religion...it's a Satanic Death Cult.
:) |
|
|
| kevin49er |
Why is the letter you posted above not part of his official house website?
Oh wait... he is asking for contributions on the other website which would be against federal election laws to do it on the House domain.
There is some pretty incindiary stuff in the other "special letters" that would be considered by many to be treasonous... hence he is doing it on his "personal" website and using the protection of the 1st Amendment. |
|
|
| Stickman |
Quote: Originally posted by kevin49er
There is some pretty incindiary stuff in the other "special letters" that would be considered by many to be treasonous... |
Wanna post it, Kev? So we can see what the right wing construes as treasonous. |
|
|
| kevin49er |
Again, why do you insist that anyone with views that aren't exactly what yours are, is a right winger or a conservative?
I've told you time and time again... I am not a republican, nor do I support Bush and his policies.
And no, I will not post them. FW provided a link, and they are easy to find... |
|
|
| Stickman |
Quote: Originally posted by kevin49er
Again, why do you insist that anyone with views that aren't exactly what yours are, is a right winger or a conservative?
I've told you time and time again... I am not a republican, nor do I support Bush and his policies.
And no, I will not post them. FW provided a link, and they are easy to find... |
Maybe I jumped the gun. I read Kucinich's letter and found it to be an agressive call for diplomacy and peace. I do associate this endless beat of the war drum a right wing characteristic.
If you think that criticizing the current admin. is treasonous, you need to read the Declaration of Independence which is even more specific about what must happen to an admin that drags the country through needless abuses.
What you call treason, the founding fathers considered the height of patriotism. |
|
|
| kevin49er |
Agreed, but you would be better served using the Constitution to support your cause rather than the Declaration.
While it is true that the DoI does explicitly say what should and should not be done with an overbearing government, it makes no reference to a political administration. We didn't(nor did the British) have a national political structure in place at the time it was written. The Constitution was the founding and the framework of our current form of government.
The Supreme Court(although biased as it is) is charged with interpreting the Constitution. The DoI guarantees us nothing. It is just an explaination of why we were no longer going to answer to or pay taxes to the king of England. The SC should and probably will strike down these laws that are being passed that virtually eliminate the Bill of Rights, as well as eliminate a few of the "checks and balances" afforded each branch by the Constitution. It should, and most likely will be struck down by the first court to hear an appeal, because it does away with one of the most important rights afforded... the right to a trial.
I find it interesting that with all the run up to the "terror" bill being passed by both the House and Senate, that Bush has had it on his desk for 2 weeks now, and still hasn't signed it... what is he waiting on? It is written the exact way that he wanted it to be... perhaps he is waiting for an opportune time? Or maybe he knows how illegal it really is and is just going to sit on it... and let it get a Pocket Veto... and let it quietly die. |
|
|
| FatesWebb |
Quote: Originally posted by kevin49er
Agreed, but you would be better served using the Constitution to support your cause rather than the Declaration.
While it is true that the DoI does explicitly say what should and should not be done with an overbearing government, it makes no reference to a political administration. We didn't(nor did the British) have a national political structure in place at the time it was written. The Constitution was the founding and the framework of our current form of government.
The Supreme Court(although biased as it is) is charged with interpreting the Constitution. The DoI guarantees us nothing. It is just an explaination of why we were no longer going to answer to or pay taxes to the king of England. The SC should and probably will strike down these laws that are being passed that virtually eliminate the Bill of Rights, as well as eliminate a few of the "checks and balances" afforded each branch by the Constitution. It should, and most likely will be struck down by the first court to hear an appeal, because it does away with one of the most important rights afforded... the right to a trial.
I find it interesting that with all the run up to the "terror" bill being passed by both the House and Senate, that Bush has had it on his desk for 2 weeks now, and still hasn't signed it... what is he waiting on? It is written the exact way that he wanted it to be... perhaps he is waiting for an opportune time? Or maybe he knows how illegal it really is and is just going to sit on it... and let it get a Pocket Veto... and let it quietly die. |
maybe he knows it will hurt the republicans chances at re-election to the house and senate, so he is wating till after elections, to sign it. |
|
|
| Stonewall |
Why must I look at anything beyond this letter that is the topic?
The letter is grounds for a Treason Charge. |
|
|
| FatesWebb |
Quote: Originally posted by Stonewall
Why must I look at anything beyond this letter that is the topic?
The letter is grounds for a Treason Charge. |
no it is not. you are the one that is guilty of treason, you and anyone else that still supports bush.
FW |
|
|
| kevin49er |
Quote: Originally posted by Kucinich Letter
Dear Friends,...
...
...
With your support, I intend to continue to insist upon:
(1) Direct negotiations with Iran.
(2) The US must guarantee Iran and the world community that it will not attack Iran.
(3) Iran must open once again to international inspections of its nuclear program.
(4) Iran must agree not to build nuclear weapons.
...
...
|
Aren't those the same assurances that we got from N. Korea in 1994???
Seems like there might have been a "boom heard round the world" the other day.
While I agree that Iran and Nukes is a really bad idea... hearing Bush just say that he "reserves all options" on N. Korea is a little frightning too.
Is this the return to an era of "Brinksmanship" and hiding under classroom desks? |
|
|
| kevin49er |
Article 3, section 3: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.
Lets not attack Iran if they get a nuke... that is giving aid and comfort.
Giving details of the evacuation of the Capitol Building... giving aid.
Revealing details of a "proposed Blockaid"... giving aid.
I have to agree that it is vague... but hey, we have been down this road before. |
|
|
| jerryjr99 |
| What does the letter consist of the fact he is a gay loooooser |
|
|
| DUDE-HERE |
| fuck dennis...guy can't even keep a relationship with a woman, no wives, no kids, no chance of ever getting laid..i remember when he was running, dems tried to get him a wife for the election..funny ..he is a pathetic human |
|
|
| Stickman |
Quote: Originally posted by DUDE-HERE
fuck dennis...guy can't even keep a relationship with a woman, no wives, no kids, no chance of ever getting laid..i remember when he was running, dems tried to get him a wife for the election..funny ..he is a pathetic human |
Hey genius, you want to explain how that's any different than our current Secretary of State? |
|
|
| Oz |
Quote: Originally posted by DUDE-HERE
fuck dennis...guy can't even keep a relationship with a woman, no wives, no kids, no chance of ever getting laid..i remember when he was running, dems tried to get him a wife for the election..funny ..he is a pathetic human |
I take it you're married with kids? |
|
|
| FatesWebb |
Quote: Originally posted by kevin49er
Article 3, section 3: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.
Lets not attack Iran if they get a nuke... that is giving aid and comfort.
Giving details of the evacuation of the Capitol Building... giving aid.
Revealing details of a "proposed Blockaid"... giving aid.
I have to agree that it is vague... but hey, we have been down this road before. |
so clearly halliburton and even DICK CHENEY HIMSELF are more guilty of treason than he is. his were mere words, Halliburton actually helped Iran get the nuclear technology.
http://www.google.com/search?q=halliburton+iran+nuclear
so lets get dick cheney, halliburton, and Dennis Kucinich and try them for treason.
who do you think will get off? the guy who wrote about it? of the ones that sold them the components, and helped them with the technology?
FW
SOURCES to cite:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6982444/site/newsweek/
The deal, diplomatic sources tell NEWSWEEK, was signed with an Iranian oil company whose principals include Sirus Naseri, Tehran’s chief international negotiator on matters relating to the country’s hotly-disputed nuclear enrichment program—a project the Bush administration has charged is intended to develop nuclear weapons.
and more...... |
|
|
| jerryjr99 |
Quote: Originally posted by DUDE-HERE
fuck dennis...guy can't even keep a relationship with a woman, no wives, no kids, no chance of ever getting laid..i remember when he was running, dems tried to get him a wife for the election..funny ..he is a pathetic human |
:beer: |
|
|
| jerryjr99 |
Quote: Originally posted by FatesWebb
so clearly halliburton and even DICK CHENEY HIMSELF are more guilty of treason than he is. his were mere words, Halliburton actually helped Iran get the nuclear technology.
http://www.google.com/search?q=halliburton+iran+nuclear
so lets get dick cheney, halliburton, and Dennis Kucinich and try them for treason.
who do you think will get off? the guy who wrote about it? of the ones that sold them the components, and helped them with the technology?
FW
SOURCES to cite:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6982444/site/newsweek/
The deal, diplomatic sources tell NEWSWEEK, was signed with an Iranian oil company whose principals include Sirus Naseri, Tehran’s chief international negotiator on matters relating to the country’s hotly-disputed nuclear enrichment program—a project the Bush administration has charged is intended to develop nuclear weapons.
and more...... |
Has anyone ever told you that you are as full of shit as a GOD DAMN Christmas Turkey?? |
|
|
| FatesWebb |
| only people who refuse to see the facts... look into what I said, its the truth... hell msn is linked in the damn article for one... keep protecting the real terrorists. every thing in that message was TRUTH AND CAN BE PROVEN. which point in particular do you not believe? |
|
|
| jerryjr99 |
Quote: Originally posted by FatesWebb
only people who refuse to see the facts... look into what I said, its the truth... hell msn is linked in the damn article for one... keep protecting the real terrorists. every thing in that message was TRUTH AND CAN BE PROVEN. which point in particular do you not believe? |
well shit if MSN says it then it MUST be the truth huh???
damnit :rolleyes: |
|
|
| NCMike06 |
Kucinich is a complete and total JOKE. He is not electable as President or anything close BECAUSE he is a complete and total JOKE.
Anyone who takes him seriously is a COMPLETE and TOTAL JOKE.
Stonewall is correct...he is a traitor. |
|
|
| FatesWebb |
| he is less treasonous than your avatar. |
|
|
| kevin49er |
Fates,
You say that our "actions"(or inactions as the case may be) are treasonous... ok fine... maybe they are...
But would you not also have to admit that IF you are wrong on all these newfangled theories and such, that it is you sir that is the traitor? Is it not you that is one of the key people that is permeating this stuff through these boards?
I know you are going say that you are right... because you always are... the truth is on your side... blah de fuckin' blah... but again... as I have said before... the road goes both ways.
One question... (and please, just a yes or no answer)... are you going to vote in November? |
|
|
| nedmark61 |
Quote: Originally posted by Stickman
Kucinich is one of the few thinking humans in Congress. Too bad he's totally unelectable as a presidential candidate. |
lol....u obviously aren't from ohio...especially cleveland...this guy is a moron and spouts off at the mouth with nothing to back it up.....hes been doing it for years....up here is usually a punchline to everyones joke |
|
|
| nedmark61 |
| its kind of amusing that all these people talking about this joke of a man aren't from ohio |
|
|
| FatesWebb |
newfangled? new like the fact that over 2000 years ago nero firebombed rome?
as far as you calling me a traitor for asking questions that "may be wrong" please re-read the declaration of independence, then think about it, and then re-ask your question. were the writers of the document treasonous?
hint....
Quote: Originally posted by our forefathers
That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. |
but that is ok, we may not need to revolt yet, so far the courts are calling bullshit on bushes bullshit... for instance
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdi_v._Rumsfeld
of cours that didnt help because bush just made more laws to defy the courts, you see the real fight is against america, not iraq, iran, or al qaeda... it is against you and I. and our courts....
I guess you and I should pray that our courts system doesnt fail us, because our congress, and our president has. |
|
|
| kevin49er |
| Are you going to answer my question??? |
|
|
| FatesWebb |
| ok, yes, I am going to vote. |
|
|
| kevin49er |
So as much as you trash it and provide evidence that it is corrupt...
You still beleive the system works...
Simply. Amazing. |
|
|
| FatesWebb |
hah, you are lost...
1) why would I work so hard on here and then not back up it with a voter card? (hypocritical)
2) its not that I have faith in diebold, and kharris, but I still have to try, I didnt say I have given up on America, I said (the leaders of) America has(have) given up on us. that is not to say we should lay down and die... we should fight to get our country back. |
|
|
| Oz |
Quote: Originally posted by nedmark61
lol....u obviously aren't from ohio...especially cleveland...this guy is a moron and spouts off at the mouth with nothing to back it up.....hes been doing it for years....up here is usually a punchline to everyones joke |
:lol: yeah, what an idiot he is :lol:
yet you guys keep voting him in :rolleyes: |
|
|
| kevin49er |
Quote: Originally posted by FatesWebb
hah, you are lost...
1) why would I work so hard on here and then not back up it with a voter card? (hypocritical)
2) its not that I have faith in diebold, and kharris, but I still have to try, I didnt say I have given up on America, I said (the leaders of) America has(have) given up on us. that is not to say we should lay down and die... we should fight to get our country back. |
I'm lost???
I'm not the one stuck in a rut of circular logic.
You tell us that Diebold is corrupt, voter machines have been and will be hacked, and that the Republicans are going to steal the election, because they have before... and you insinuate that no single vote will count.
Then, on the flip side you tell us that you still believe in the system, that we shouldn't roll over, and we need to fight to win America back...
Sheesh... pick (a side) already. Whats with the (parentheses)? Just(say) what you mean... |
|
|
| FatesWebb |
Quote: Originally posted by kevin49er
I'm lost???
I'm not the one stuck in a rut of circular logic.
You tell us that Diebold is corrupt, voter machines have been and will be hacked, and that the Republicans are going to steal the election, because they have before... and you insinuate that no single vote will count.
Then, on the flip side you tell us that you still believe in the system, that we shouldn't roll over, and we need to fight to win America back...
Sheesh... pick (a side) already. Whats with the (parentheses)? Just(say) what you mean... |
Kevin, diebold can only influence the election at this time, they cannot steal it full on... if enough people vote... not to mention a favorite senator of ours has already asked that diebold be set aside for paper ballots. do you think that would have happened if we all had laid down and let them perform thier voter fraud, and not fought back? So if hitler puts on makeup and sneaks into the whitehouse, and riggs elections should we all lay down and let it happen? or should we be active in exposing him?
The Declaration of Independance, for which YOU STILL DO NOT UNDERSTAND, (again) says it in full, since when I quoted it directly you didnt understand, let me paraphrase it for you this time.
it basically says...
"If the government gets out of control with greed and corruption, the citizens have the right to fight back."
I wonder if they meant lay down as you suggest that I do.
FatesWebb |
|
|
|
|
|
