| boobookittyfuk |
Though admittedly, I'm not even sure I'd really consider it a critique, a criticism, and I bring this up now because I've noticed it that much more again when I'm sitting here watching once again some of the newest Cassia Riley & Jamie Lynn piece. Which, lemme tell ya, I'm right along with Artie, I am ALLLLL about Cassia, I mean good fuckin god I'm so in love with this girl, she is drop dead gorgeous (and it's easy to see with him, I mean that's the Dana prototype right there -- mind you as hot as Dana is herself, Cassia is like a SUPER hot version of her) and I actually really dig now that's putting on a bit more weight, it gives her that much more awesome curves, she's so adorable... and of course those awesome natural boobs growing as another factor :p lol
But ANYWAY..... something I've noticed now several times when Howard's talking to either just one chick or two there on the couch and some form of lesbian action has come up in the conversation (gee :rolleyes: :p ) When he's coaxing a story out of whoever the girls happen to be that day, he suddenly acts as if he's never heard a recounting of a lesbian tale in his life. God forgive me, but it's almost like he's a kid sometimes listening to how he's phrasing what he's saying as he's asking the questions, so intently trying to follow the string of events that the girls are sharing. In a way it's practically like he looks at lesbianism as something that he's never even been aware of before that day.
Has anyone else felt like they've picked up on this at all? I suppose you could just as well from strictly listening, but more often than not I'm catching the interviews fresh as I'm watching the segments. But back to the question as to whether or not it's a criticism, I mean, hell I'm just not sure if that's even a negative thing or not for the host of a show. Maybe that's actually the sign of a great interviewer.
Though, don't get me wrong, I've for years now felt he was -- at least meanstream-wise -- felt he was a vastly underrated interviewer, but, I dunno... something just started to "stick out" for me, I guess you'd say, with this, I'd just pick up on it more and more. So what do you all think? |
|
|
| Dr.Gonzo |
Quote: Originally posted by boobookittyfuk
Though admittedly, I'm not even sure I'd really consider it a critique, a criticism, and I bring this up now because I've noticed it that much more again when I'm sitting here watching once again some of the newest Cassia Riley & Jamie Lynn piece. Which, lemme tell ya, I'm right along with Artie, I am ALLLLL about Cassia, I mean good fuckin god I'm so in love with this girl, she is drop dead gorgeous (and it's easy to see with him, I mean that's the Dana prototype right there -- mind you as hot as Dana is herself, Cassia is like a SUPER hot version of her) and I actually really dig now that's putting on a bit more weight, it gives her that much more awesome curves, she's so adorable... and of course those awesome natural boobs growing as another factor :p lol
But ANYWAY..... something I've noticed now several times when Howard's talking to either just one chick or two there on the couch and some form of lesbian action has come up in the conversation (gee :rolleyes: :p ) When he's coaxing a story out of whoever the girls happen to be that day, he suddenly acts as if he's never heard a recounting of a lesbian tale in his life. God forgive me, but it's almost like he's a kid sometimes listening to how he's phrasing what he's saying as he's asking the questions, so intently trying to follow the string of events that the girls are sharing. In a way it's practically like he looks at lesbianism as something that he's never even been aware of before that day.
Has anyone else felt like they've picked up on this at all? I suppose you could just as well from strictly listening, but more often than not I'm catching the interviews fresh as I'm watching the segments. But back to the question as to whether or not it's a criticism, I mean, hell I'm just not sure if that's even a negative thing or not for the host of a show. Maybe that's actually the sign of a great interviewer.
Though, don't get me wrong, I've for years now felt he was -- at least meanstream-wise -- felt he was a vastly underrated interviewer, but, I dunno... something just started to "stick out" for me, I guess you'd say, with this, I'd just pick up on it more and more. So what do you all think? |
:birthday: |
|
|
|
