|
Note: This is a Text only archive. Go directly to the real forum.
the xm / sirius merger would mean more cash for talent and staff
- Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
banner
| the xm / sirius merger would mean more cash for talent and staff
- Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
|
| skylarbrie |
| the companies are estimated to save 7 billions dollars, if the merger wins approval. moreover, we could also see a reduction in subscription fees |
|
|
| Clownpuncher |
Quote: Originally posted by skylarbrie
we could also see a reduction in subscription fees |
:jj: Yeah right |
|
|
| bubba4eva |
| a monopoly company would mean higher prices maybe not right away but for sure soon. |
|
|
| skylarbrie |
| hey, i'm a non matriculated business major, therefor, i have limited knowledge of the world of finance, nevertheless, my knowledge supersedes your comprehension |
|
|
| jmgmmg |
| O&A please report to the Bubbagon! :boxer: :box: :punch: |
|
|
| kali |
no one "gives" talent more money just because they have it. trust me, I've been a freelance artist my entire adult life and businessmen are loath to give anyone money. You have to fight for it. that's life. it's always been like that and it will never change.
why do you think artists eventually stop??? it gets exhusting to constantly have to beat people over the head to get paid a decent amount of money |
|
|
| mcbutton1970 |
Lower subscription rates? Would be nice.
Likelihood of lower subscription rates? You have a better chance finding Jimmy Hoffa's body.
There's a reason why the government broke up Bell Phone around 1980. If you think your phone bill is high now, just imagine what it would be if that monopoly were to exist in this day and age. I think it's shitty that the FCC actually has a say-so in this. |
|
|
| greddy10 |
| dude, no way will the subscription fee go down, if anything it will go up :hw: |
|
|
| skylarbrie |
| currently, xm / Sirius are spending billions of dollars to capture market share, in the event of a merger, there will no longer be a need for this expenditure, hence the saving of a reported 7 billion dollars in operating cost |
|
|
|
|
|
