|
Note: This is a Text only archive. Go directly to the real forum.
Racist College Republicans Stage "Illegal Alien Hunt"
- Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
banner
| Racist College Republicans Stage "Illegal Alien Hunt"
- Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
|
| angrychink |
'...make some very special won ton soup for you....."
~ eddie murphy |
|
|
| Ass Boil |
Quote: Originally posted by curleydan
but you dont disagree with democrats being tree hugging homos? |
I can only speak for myself:
1) I am in favor of protecting our environment. If that makes me a "tree hugger", then so be it.... I have always found that to be one of the most pointless insults.
2) I am not, and have never been a member of the Democratic party.
3) I am definitely not a homosexual....
There you go. |
|
|
| tbite69 |
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
I can only speak for myself:
1) I am in favor of protecting our environment. If that makes me a "tree hugger", then so be it.... I have always found that to be one of the most pointless insults.
2) I am not, and have never been a member of the Democratic party.
3) I am definitely a homosexual....
There you go. |
You go girl |
|
|
| angrychink |
see, but, why do you purposely do shit like that?
you are wrong, it can easily be proven
you're just a dick |
|
|
| tbite69 |
Quote: Originally posted by angrychink
see, but, why do you purposely do shit like that?
you are wrong, it can easily be proven
you have a big dick |
did your mom tell you?
Have you read my profile??
Look what my occupation is, then you'll understand more as to where my attitude is.
ok. chinadoll |
|
|
| angrychink |
damn, that's so republican
i could care less what your occupation is
again this self congratulatory attitude
really....re labeling others messages is all you fucking got? |
|
|
| Frankly |
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
Uh, who said anything about "offending" illegals, you fucktard?
This is about cowardly young Repukes like you ( depending on which of your ages we believe), who are too scared to enlist but think it's cute to "hunt" human beings. |
--Illegal Aliens need to be arrested and deported on a mass scale.
Businesses that hire Illegals need to be fined heavily and put on notice.
Close the business down, if necessary.
Give the Border Agents a lot more Official freedom to seek and arrest Illegals.
What part of Illegal Alien do you not understand? |
|
|
| Ass Boil |
Quote: Originally posted by Frankly
--Illegal Aliens need to be arrested and deported on a mass scale.
Businesses that hire Illegals need to be fined heavily and put on notice.
Close the business down, if necessary.
Give the Border Agents a lot more Official freedom to seek and arrest Illegals.
What part of Illegal Alien do you not understand? |
What part of TWO DIFFERENT ISSUES do you not understand? The entire point of my post is that instead of asking your cult leader Bush to simply ENFORCE the laws that would prevent companies form hiring illegals, they are playing tough guy, pretending to "hunt" humans.
If it were not possible for them to get JOBS here, they would stop coming, no?
pull your head out of your ass, stupid. |
|
|
| tbite69 |
| I've never hunted before since I'm a animal lover, but if they would make it legal to hunt illegals then I'd be the first in line for the hunt. |
|
|
| zimmie |
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
What part of TWO DIFFERENT ISSUES do you not understand? The entire point of my post is that instead of asking your cult leader Bush to simply ENFORCE the laws that would prevent companies form hiring illegals, they are playing tough guy, pretending to "hunt" humans.
If it were not possible for them to get JOBS here, they would stop coming, no?
pull your head out of your ass, stupid. |
Once again, you have no idea what your talking about. These illegals have paperwork better than yours....Birth certificates, SSN's, ....etc etc....Most companies are not purposely hiring them |
|
|
| zimmie |
Quote: Originally posted by tbite69
I've never hunted before since I'm a animal lover, but if they would make it legal to hunt illegals then I'd be the first in line for the hunt. |
Hunt them?....Hell there right out in front of us....
It's illegal to ask a student, or his parents, entering a public school if they are legal or not! Thanks ACLU!! |
|
|
| Ass Boil |
Quote: Originally posted by tbite69
I've never hunted before since I'm a animal lover, but if they would make it legal to hunt illegals then I'd be the first in line for the hunt. |
That's because you are just as cowardly and stupid as the college Republicans in the original post...
Congratulations. |
|
|
| tbite69 |
Quote: Originally posted by zimmie
Once again, you have no idea what your talking about. These illegals have paperwork better than yours....Birth certificates, SSN's, ....etc etc....Most companies are not purposely hiring them |
Thats about half right.
Yes some companies don't care and others are really duped. Some accept documents they know are fake but figure it covers there ass.
I'd be shocked if at least 70% of illegals weren't working without papers or with papers that the company knows is fake but looks the other way.
30% are probably really duped |
|
|
| Ass Boil |
Quote: Originally posted by zimmie
Once again, you have no idea what your talking about. These illegals have paperwork better than yours....Birth certificates, SSN's, ....etc etc....Most companies are not purposely hiring them |
You fucking retarded idiot! You DO know that if Bush had not stopped enforcing it, it was, is VERY easy to validate SSN numbers, etc.? The IRS can tell in about 2 seconds if the number is a fake.
Try another excuse, stupid.
This whole problem goes away if Bush enforces the laws we ALREADY HAVE to stop it. |
|
|
| tbite69 |
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
That's because you are just as cowardly and stupid as the college Republicans in the original post...
Congratulations. |
Why? because I am a animal lover, sorry I could never hurt an animal. |
|
|
| Ass Boil |
Quote: Originally posted by tbite69
Why? because I am a animal lover, sorry I could never hurt an animal. |
Stop trying to be clever.... That act doesn't really fly for you.
Like most racist morons, you have convinced yourself that partially "admitting" it is enough....
intellectual and moral laziness at it's finest. |
|
|
| tbite69 |
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
You fucking retarded idiot! You DO know that if Bush had not stopped enforcing it, it was, is VERY easy to validate SSN numbers, etc.? The IRS can tell in about 2 seconds if the number is a fake.
Try another excuse, stupid.
This whole problem goes away if Bush enforces the laws we ALREADY HAVE to stop it. |
This is the biggest failure of the Bush era. In my opinion he will always be known as the president that sold out America to Mexico.
The biggest problem is not fake SSN but stolen SSN from law abiding americans that wake up to bad credit from it one day. I used to see 1 case every year or so, this being 10 years ago. Now I see 2 a month....this is a financial epidemic and I mostly do business in areas with only a moderate amount of illegals. In the southwest it's 5 times as bad |
|
|
| Crazytree |
Quote: Originally posted by Halcyon
I get my eighths for $35..... I just bought 2 ounces for $400 (that's the typical price for one ounce)
I got a good hook-up right now :) |
no a good hook-up would be an ounce for $65. not that I would know where to get something like that though. |
|
|
| tbite69 |
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
Stop trying to be clever.... That act doesn't really fly for you.
Like most racist morons, you have convinced yourself that partially "admitting" it is enough....
intellectual and moral laziness at it's finest. |
and to think I just agreed with you...
what is an ass boil anyway?? Is it the open wound left after you take it in the ass from GayTony?? |
|
|
| zimmie |
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
You fucking retarded idiot! You DO know that if Bush had not stopped enforcing it, it was, is VERY easy to validate SSN numbers, etc.? The IRS can tell in about 2 seconds if the number is a fake.
Try another excuse, stupid.
This whole problem goes away if Bush enforces the laws we ALREADY HAVE to stop it. |
Call the IRS Monday and ask them if your SS# is fake......see what they tell you......
and remember to press #4 for English
lol |
|
|
| tbite69 |
Quote: Originally posted by Crazytree
no a good hook-up would be an ounce for $65. not that I would know where to get something like that though. |
Jamaica.... |
|
|
| tbite69 |
Quote: Originally posted by zimmie
Call the IRS Monday and ask them if your SS# is fake......see what they tell you......
and remember to press #4 for English
lol |
and set aside about 4 hours to be on hold :D |
|
|
| Kill Van Kull |
Quote: Originally posted by Hater
Quote: non-partisan? hmmm i find it hard to smoke greenery and be a republican...counterintuitve... |
If you smoke weed you are automatically NOT, by definition, a republican. 90% of the republican party are NOT, by definition, republicans, they're just too easily fooled.
College republican? Let's face it, these are just a bunch of dorks and nerds that finally have something to do on Saturday night when all of the cool kids are out drinking and getting laid.
:p |
|
|
| Ass Boil |
Quote: Originally posted by tbite69
and to think I just agreed with you...
what is an ass boil anyway?? Is it the open wound left after you take it in the ass from GayTony?? |
Here is a study you might be interested in:
--------------------------------------
Is Homophobia Associated With Homosexual Arousal?
Henry E. Adams, Lester W. Wright, Jr., and Bethany A. Lohr
University of Georgia
The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in exclusively heterosexual men who admitted
negative affect toward homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of homophobic
men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29); they were assigned to groups
on the basis of their scores on the Index of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980).
The men were exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of heterosexual, male homosexual,
and lesbian videotapes, and changes in penile circumference were monitored. They also completed
an Aggression Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992 ). Both groups exhibited increases
in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female homosexual videos. Only the homophobic
men showed an increase in penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ in
aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual arousal that the homophobic
individual is either unaware of or denies.
http://www.oogachaga.com/downloads/...ual_arousal.pdf |
|
|
| tbite69 |
Quote: Originally posted by Kill Van Kull
If you smoke weed you are automatically NOT, by definition, a republican. 90% of the republican party are NOT, by definition, republicans, they're just too easily fooled.
College republican? Let's face it, these are just a bunch of dorks and nerds that finally have something to do on Saturday night when all of the cool kids are out drinking and getting laid.
:p |
I smoke and I've been a republican my whole adult life.
Not sure what colleges your refering to, but most of the young republicans are good looking, popular and greek society members. Stereotypes are usually wrong.
I'm guessing you hate your job and your boss's boss was a young republican |
|
|
| tbite69 |
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
Here is a study you might be interested in:
It was a joke....and I support gay marriage. Once again I'm a moderate unlike you lefty
|
sorry didn't mean for it to post up there |
|
|
| Ass Boil |
Quote: Originally posted by zimmie
Call the IRS Monday and ask them if your SS# is fake......see what they tell you......
and remember to press #4 for English
lol |
You are an idiot.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SSA Attempts to Stem Fraud
Employers are required by law to verify that an employee has a valid SSN. The Social Security Administration has long been aware that millions of people living illegally in the United States have obtained SSNs fraudulently using a variety of means. It has systematically taken steps to limit the purposes for which an SSN can be issued and to better validate the underlying "breeder" documents presented to obtain a SSN. In May 2002, SSA announced a new initiative, a beneficial by-product of which has been to identify people working illegally in the United States. The program’s purpose is to reduce the size and growth of what is known as the Earnings Suspense File (ESF).
When employers file annual withholding tax reports, SSA matches the report from the employer to the name, address, and SSN provided by an employee. So-called "mismatches" are posted to the ESF, which contains information on $327 billion in wages accrued between tax years 1937 and 1999. In 1999 alone, the ESF grew by 8.3 million W-2s and $39.4 billion in wages. A recent SSA report indicated that 96 per cent of ESF wages had been posted since 1970, about the time that an unprecedented number of illegal immigrants began arriving in the United States.1
This year SSA sent out over 750,000 letters to employers of approximately seven million workers whose names did not match the SSN provided.2 Employees who cannot provide a credible reason for the mismatch either voluntarily seek employment elsewhere or are terminated. Unfortunately, the SSA has no legal authority to levy fines and penalties against either employees who fraudulently obtain a SSN or against employers who repeatedly submit large numbers of wage reports with incorrect SSNs. They must rely on the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to do so, and audits have revealed this rarely happens.3
The IRS Provides "Official" Identification to Illegal Aliens
The IRS’s seeming lack of interest in protecting the integrity of the Social Security number from fraudulent use pales to insignificance, however, when faced with the reality that it is responsible for providing a backdoor way for millions of illegal aliens to receive a U.S. government-issued identity number. And it is doing so despite the fact that in 1999 the Treasury Department’s Inspector General for Tax Administration said the decision by the IRS to issue these Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers (ITINs) to illegal aliens "seems counter-productive to the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) mission to identify illegal aliens and prevent unlawful entry."4
Genesis of ITINs. The audit report referenced above said that a 1994 IRS investigation uncovered significant compliance problems "with the $80 billion annual nonresident alien U.S. investment income." In response, the IRS created an ITIN for non-resident aliens in order to match information documents showing dividend, interest and other income earned by individuals to the tax returns they file. The IRS began issuing ITINs in July 1996.
Either at the program’s inception or shortly thereafter, the IRS seems to have expanded the initial purpose of the ITIN by making a policy decision to issue it to resident aliens, including individuals residing illegally in the United States. The audit report referenced above questioned this policy to "legalize" illegal aliens.
Significant portions of the report were deemed to be so sensitive they were redacted from the public document, in part because it is felt that some information could be used to facilitate fraud by illegal aliens. Once an IRS report has been redacted, it stays that way. Therefore, the full text of the 1999 Inspector General for Tax Administration’s report on ITINs is still not available for public review. No follow-up report was issued.
Illegals get undeserved tax benefits. The 1999 report appears to include extensive commentary on the ITIN applications of 340,000 illegal aliens, but most of it was redacted. The IRS’s objective may be to collect tax revenue from the broadest base possible — a laudable goal. Ironically, however, this has resulted in the IRS ignoring illegals’ presence in the United States. One of the reasons why illegals are issued ITINs is that IRS regulations determine resident alien status based on "substantial presence" in the United States, not legal residence. Thus, illegal aliens who file tax returns are treated in the same way as legal foreign residents and receive the same tax benefits, such as spousal exemptions, child and education tax credits. The one exception seems to be the Earned Income Tax Credit, which is available to legal permanent residents but which the IRS decided would not be available to illegal aliens.
Intended or not, it is clear that a significant number of illegal aliens are receiving the Earned Income Tax Credit. This is talked about quite openly by their advocates. Moreover, in its publications the IRS is signaling that this is a problem. One of three bullet points at the top of Form W-7 used to apply for an ITIN reads: "Receipt of an ITIN does not make you eligible to claim the earned income credit (EIC)."5
Further, a section describing the Earned Income Tax Credit on the IRS web site lists six rules that must be followed. "Rule 1. You Must Have a Valid Social Security Number (SSN). . .You cannot get the EIC if, instead of an SSN, you (or your spouse if filing a joint return) have an individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN). ITINs are issued by the Internal Revenue Service to noncitizens who cannot get an SSN."6
It is an unfortunate fact of life that U.S. citizens routinely claim tax deductions and credits to which they are not entitled. It is a cat and mouse game that presumably the IRS wins more often than not. However, there was language in the Inspector General’s 1999 report implying that both "revenue protection issues" and "operational problems during the implementation" period resulted in the ITIN being vulnerable to fraud. It is possible that the IRS system was programmed in a way that makes it very difficult to prevent payment of the Earned Income Credit if a resident alien unauthorized to work in the United States claims it.
IRS shields illegals from INS. This same audit report said that issuing ITINs to illegal aliens may take on greater significance if the IRS were to come under the scrutiny of Congress. "Illegal alien presence in the United States is a congressional concern which is addressed by legislation in the Welfare Reform Act and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996."7
The Inspector General’s audit also pointed out that the IRS has a policy of shielding illegal immigrants from exposure to the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), which appears to be in contravention of the express wishes of Congress. "The IRS provides disclosure protection to illegal alien applicants. The Congress has clearly stated how the federal government is to communicate between agencies concerning illegal aliens. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 . . . states that information concerning illegal alien status should be provided to the INS notwithstanding any other law." Subsequent exposition revealed that IRS management believed its own regulations guaranteed the confidentiality of tax return information and did not intend to share any returns with the INS.8
If that is still the position of the IRS, it is even more untenable today. The USA Patriot Act of 2001, passed overwhelmingly by Congress in response to the terrorist attacks on America, explicitly calls for greater information sharing among government agencies, law enforcement and the intelligence community.9
It is not clear if the IRS regulations regarding confidentiality relate specifically to divulging tax information, such as income, number of dependents, etc., or if they also forbid the IRS from sharing even the taxpayer’s name and identification number with another government agency.
It also is unclear if copies (redacted or not) of the Inspector General’s 1999 report were shared with Congressional committees responsible for oversight of the IRS. The report was addressed to the IRS Commissioner and noted that copies also were being sent to IRS managers affected by the report’s recommendations. This distribution approach differs from that followed by the Inspector General for the Social Security Administration, who also addresses his reports to the Commissioner while simultaneously distributing copies to a long list of members of Congress whose committees presumably have oversight over SSA.
IRS ignores fraudulent use of SSNs. Illegal aliens have been warned by advocates not to use the ITIN when applying for employment, as it would expose their illegal status. All publications from both the IRS and the SSA say that an individual can have either an ITIN or an SSN, but not both. But since employees suffer no penalty for using fraudulent SSNs, they continue to do so. Similarly, since employers benefiting from cheap labor also suffer no penalty, they continue to hire illegal aliens without checking the validity of their SSNs. Once someone is hired, employers begin to withhold taxes.
It is believed that far more ITINs have been issued than annual tax returns filed and that illegal residents who file returns do so to claim refunds. If so, presumably they use the ITIN provided by the IRS as their identifier on the 1040 Form, attaching the W-2 form provided by their employer. The catch is that their fraudulently obtained SSNs appear on the W-2 forms. Illegal aliens can obtain a SSN in a variety of ways. They can make up a number, steal or borrow someone else’s, buy a counterfeit Social Security card, or obtain a valid Social Security card fraudulently.10 What is abundantly clear is that they are not entitled to it.
Knowing that the ITIN would not be necessary if the SSN were legitimate, apparently the IRS has been processing the returns anyway — ignoring this clear violation of its own rules. It could not be determined if there is a penalty attached to using both numbers simultaneously or if the IRS notifies the SSA about the possibility of a fraudulently obtained SSN. If the IRS does not do so, it would appear that the agency is undermining the integrity of Social Security numbers and U.S. immigration law and could be endangering homeland security.
http://www.cis.org/articles/2002/back1202.html |
|
|
| Ass Boil |
Quote: Originally posted by tbite69
sorry didn't mean for it to post up there |
You have been trying to convince everyone you are a "moderate" since your first day here.... I am still waiting for some actual evidence of this.
To me you are just another slow-witted, racist Republican |
|
|
| Kill Van Kull |
Quote: Originally posted by tbite69
I smoke and I've been a republican my whole adult life.
Not sure what colleges your refering to, but most of the young republicans are good looking, popular and greek society members. Stereotypes are usually wrong.
I'm guessing you hate your job and your boss's boss was a young republican |
Everyone knows there' no such thing as a "good looking" republican.
I guess we all now know what kind of kid you were in school.
Thanks T, for proving my point.
:p |
|
|
| Stonewall |
Quote: Originally posted by Hater
But it's true...all racists are republican...it's simply fact...
i find it hard to believe that racists could be dems considering dems support social programs, like affirmative action and welfare...if you hated minorities, i doubt you'd support the dems b/c of these programs... |
Affirmative Action is a racist Program all in itself. It's also foul to the Constitution. |
|
|
| tbite69 |
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
You have been trying to convince everyone you are a "moderate" since your first day here.... I am still waiting for some actual evidence of this.
To me you are just another slow-witted, racist Republican |
Lets see:
Moderate Views
gay marriage
legalize most drugs
no censorship ( none what so ever )
animal rights
abortion- limited though
Conservative Views
states rights
abolish the IRS
individual responsibility
sealed and secure borders
right of religion
school vouchers
business before the enviroment
capitalism
These are my views you tell me what I am??
no gun laws |
|
|
| Clownpuncher |
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
It is the Republican party who WANTS the illegals here to cheapen the labor market, you fool.... |
While I am not disagreeing with you on this, I will say that the Democratic party wants them here just as bad. |
|
|
| Ass Boil |
Quote: Originally posted by tbite69
Lets see:
Moderate Views
gay marriage
legalize most drugs
no censorship ( none what so ever )
animal rights
abortion- limited though
Conservative Views
states rights
abolish the IRS
individual responsibility
sealed and secure borders
right of religion
school vouchers
business before the enviroment
capitalism
These are my views you tell me what I am??
no gun laws |
I like how you included "capitalism" and "individual responsibility" in your list of "views".... LOL
You really are not very bright.
I couldn't help but notice you left "racist homophobe" off your list of views.....why? |
|
|
| Ass Boil |
Quote: Originally posted by Clownpuncher
While I am not disagreeing with you on this, I will say that the Democratic party wants them here just as bad. |
There are certain members who do, no doubt. But the overwhelming majority of Republicans want the illegals here simply to keep labor cheap.... |
|
|
| curleydan |
Quote: Originally posted by SaintJimmy
That's two posts in a row without a single provable fact.
This one does however, have a number of opinions stated as flat facts, and at least one blatant baldfaced lie.
Good job. :D |
posting on sfn is fun and good times. if you put up a link with "facts" to back up your opinion regardless of which side you are on the other blasts your linked site as a shill for your side and dismisses the "facts". however, if you put you opinion up with out any link to "facts" you are blasted for not backing up your statement. essentially, one is doomed to failure.
i do have some facts for you, dismiss them if you like, it will make it easer on you i suppose.
ray nagin is a democrat
ray nagin was reelected
michael brown is a republican
michael brown was fired
michael brown used fraud to get the job at fema and should have never been there, but his failures regarding katrina are no worse than ray nagins. lets also keep in mind it wasnt the federal government looting the stores after the floods. houstons murder rate shot up 70% in november and december of 2005 over the same two months of 2004. it wasnt the republicans doing that. today new orleans is projected to have a murder right just about 8 times that of new york and just slightly down from 2004. republicans are not in charge in new orleans, have never been and imho never will. the democrats just make the city such a happy and fun loving city. |
|
|
| Ass Boil |
Nice job overlooking both the fact that Bush HIRED Brown knowing he was a clueless douche, and that Bush has done next to nothing to help New Orleans rebuild after that disaster.... According to you, NO should use all of it's own vast resources to rebuild a decimated city.
Also good to know you dislike democracy so much. Nagin was reelected by the people of NO, the same way George W. Asshole was "reelected" by America after acting like a complete fuck for 4 years.... |
|
|
| Halcyon |
Quote: Originally posted by Crazytree
no a good hook-up would be an ounce for $65. not that I would know where to get something like that though. |
Please, tell me where I can get an ounce for $65.... I plan on buying from them from now on... |
|
|
| tbite69 |
Quote: Originally posted by Halcyon
Please, tell me where I can get an ounce for $65.... I plan on buying from them from now on... |
Halcyon don't listen to Crazytree. He is one of those people that try to post like he knows something about everything, when he really doesn't know shit. Unless he is blowing the local grow-house guy or living in Jamaica he's full of shit and I doubt even the blowjob would get him any good bud for 65 bucks. |
|
|
| Halcyon |
Quote: Originally posted by tbite69
Halcyon don't listen to Crazytree. He is one of those people that try to post like he knows something about everything, when he really doesn't know shit. Unless he is blowing the local grow-house guy or living in Jamaica he's full of shit and I doubt even the blowjob would get him any good bud for 65 bucks. |
Considering an ounce at the club is $400.... I get mine for half off! That's amazing....
I've never heard of anyone getting an ounce for $65!! If that's the case, I might even transport it over state lines if I had to. |
|
|
| Billyfromsphily |
Quote: Originally posted by curleydan
posting on sfn is fun and good times. if you put up a link with "facts" to back up your opinion regardless of which side you are on the other blasts your linked site as a shill for your side and dismisses the "facts". however, if you put you opinion up with out any link to "facts" you are blasted for not backing up your statement. essentially, one is doomed to failure.
i do have some facts for you, dismiss them if you like, it will make it easer on you i suppose.
ray nagin is a democrat
ray nagin was reelected
michael brown is a republican
michael brown was fired
michael brown used fraud to get the job at fema and should have never been there, but his failures regarding katrina are no worse than ray nagins. lets also keep in mind it wasnt the federal government looting the stores after the floods. houstons murder rate shot up 70% in november and december of 2005 over the same two months of 2004. it wasnt the republicans doing that. today new orleans is projected to have a murder right just about 8 times that of new york and just slightly down from 2004. republicans are not in charge in new orleans, have never been and imho never will. the democrats just make the city such a happy and fun loving city. |
Sorry Dan,
There is a big difference.
Nagins was elected!
Brown was chosen.
Nagins is only a local politician.
Brown is a National Appointee.
You are linking facts that are completely unrelated. The faults of New Orleans have nothing to do with the irresponsible attitude and actions of the Federal Govt. To try and link them has nothing to do with the reality. |
|
|
| curleydan |
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
Nice job overlooking both the fact that Bush HIRED Brown knowing he was a clueless douche, and that Bush has done next to nothing to help New Orleans rebuild after that disaster.... According to you, NO should use all of it's own vast resources to rebuild a decimated city.
Also good to know you dislike democracy so much. Nagin was reelected by the people of NO, the same way George W. Asshole was "reelected" by America after acting like a complete fuck for 4 years.... |
oh thats just a load of bologna. i didnt overlook browns fraudulent hiring, i pointed that out. saying bush has done "next to nothing" is simply stunning. the money being poured into the gulf coast, mostly no, is on an unprecedented scale. but to you thats next to nothing. what would you have bush do???? how is me pointing out that nagin, who is a complete tool, being reelected show that i "dislike democracy"? i dont give a rat fuck who the people of no elect as their mayor, i was trying to make the point that the people down there get shit on and then reelect the people who do the shitting. |
|
|
| Crazytree |
Quote: Originally posted by tbite69
I smoke and I've been a republican my whole adult life.
Not sure what colleges your refering to, but most of the young republicans are good looking, popular and greek society members. Stereotypes are usually wrong.
I'm guessing you hate your job and your boss's boss was a young republican |
so you're a hypocrite in addition to a fucking loser? big surprise there. :rolleyes:
I guess the Republican War on Drugs applies to everyone but you, right? |
|
|
| Ass Boil |
Quote: Originally posted by curleydan
oh thats just a load of bologna. i didnt overlook browns fraudulent hiring, i pointed that out. saying bush has done "next to nothing" is simply stunning. the money being poured into the gulf coast, mostly no, is on an unprecedented scale. but to you thats next to nothing. what would you have bush do???? how is me pointing out that nagin, who is a complete tool, being reelected show that i "dislike democracy"? i dont give a rat fuck who the people of no elect as their mayor, i was trying to make the point that the people down there get shit on and then reelect the people who do the shitting. |
I never said "money" wasn't being poured into the Gulf region, I said next to nothing is being DONE. Bush SHOULD have that city almost rebuilt by now, instead only the wealthiest of neighborhoods have returned to what they were. What they are doing is waiting as long as possible in hopes that less people will return from wherever they landed after the hurricaine and they can take possession of their land, etc.
And you DID overlook the fact that Bush CHOSE Brown and focused on the fact that once he was exposed as the fraud Bush knew he was, then they did the " right " thing and fired him.... Sorry, that is not good enough. When it comes to the agency most responsible for disaster response, if BUSH hired a man with NO experience, then it is equally HIS fault.
He appointed a fucking horse judge as the head of American disaster response!! Does that not set off any alarms in your head!!!!??? What kind of fucking douchebag would care so little about disaster response that he would appoint a goddamned HORSE JUDGE as the point man? |
|
|
| curleydan |
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
I never said "money" wasn't being poured into the Gulf region, I said next to nothing is being DONE. Bush SHOULD have that city almost rebuilt by now, instead only the wealthiest of neighborhoods have returned to what they were. What they are doing is waiting as long as possible in hopes that less people will return from wherever they landed after the hurricaine and they can take possession of their land, etc.
And you DID overlook the fact that Bush CHOSE Brown and focused on the fact that once he was exposed as the fraud Bush knew he was, then they did the " right " thing and fired him.... Sorry, that is not good enough. When it comes to the agency most responsible for disaster response, if BUSH hired a man with NO experience, then it is equally HIS fault.
He appointed a fucking horse judge as the head of American disaster response!! Does that not set off any alarms in your head!!!!??? What kind of fucking douchebag would care so little about disaster response that he would appoint a goddamned HORSE JUDGE as the point man? |
when people use fraudulent means to get a job, sometimes the wrong guy gets picked. was there a failure by fema to make a through check of browns record, absolutely, but at some point dont even you have to accept that bush is not in control of every single item in the government? is it now his job to run background checks on all federal employees? the guy was a fraud, when that was exposed (due to his handling of katrina) he was fired. bush did the right thing and you are so full of hate for the guy that even when he does the right thing you find a way to still be angry. as far as the money goes, do you want every state in the union to cede its rights to the federal government? the federal government supplies an enormous sum of money to help rebuild the city and when the elected leaders of the state and city cant get off their asses and use the money its still bushs fault? at what point in this process are the elected officials down in louisiana going to have some responsibility for these continuing failures? you hate bush so much i bet you are trying to find a way to blame the valentines day snow storm on him too. |
|
|
| SaintJimmy |
Quote: Originally posted by curleydan
bush did the right thing |
This guy is talking about New Orleans and Katrina and this comes out of his mouth.
Un-fucking-believable.
Micheal Brown acted under the authority and direction of The Multi-Billion Dollar Department of Homeland Security and it's director - Micheal Chertoff who, by the way, is still running things.
Heckuva job, douchebag.
:rolleyes: |
|
|
| curleydan |
| so canning brown was not the right thing to do? im confused, i thought when bush fired him that was the right move, but that must be why im a douchebag. |
|
|
| Monster_Zero |
Quote: Originally posted by curleydan
when people use fraudulent means to get a job, sometimes the wrong guy gets picked. was there a failure by fema to make a through check of browns record, absolutely, but at some point dont even you have to accept that bush is not in control of every single item in the government? is it now his job to run background checks on all federal employees? the guy was a fraud, when that was exposed (due to his handling of katrina) he was fired. |
How is it that you can't understand, BUSH APPOINTED BROWN TO THE POSITION!!?? :confused:
Who the fuck do you blame, if not the guy who gave him the fucking job?! :bang: |
|
|
| curleydan |
Quote: Originally posted by Monster_Zero
How is it that you can't understand, BUSH APPOINTED BROWN TO THE POSITION!!?? :confused:
Who the fuck do you blame, if not the guy who gave him the fucking job?! :bang: |
i do understand that. i also understand that when all the shit about his real background came out he was fired. what i dont understand is why you guys seem to think that bush needs to be on the computer running background checks on all the federal employees. bush appointed him yes, but obviously someone dropped the ball on checking the guy out and just believed his resume.
and im not saying bush doesnt have the responsibility, for bringing him on, but he also did the right thing and canned the guy when he found out the truth. there is just no pleasing some of you. |
|
|
| Monster_Zero |
Quote: Originally posted by curleydan
i do understand that. i also understand that when all the shit about his real background came out he was fired. what i dont understand is why you guys seem to think that bush needs to be on the computer running background checks on all the federal employees. bush appointed him yes, but obviously someone dropped the ball on checking the guy out and just believed his resume.
and im not saying bush doesnt have the responsibility, for bringing him on, but he also did the right thing and canned the guy when he found out the truth. there is just no pleasing some of you. |
Unbelievable!!!
I guess Bush isn't responsible for anything he does? WTF?!?!?
I can't believe you Bush apologists... how the fuck do you people get this way?!?! |
|
|
| SaintJimmy |
Quote: Originally posted by curleydan
so canning brown was not the right thing to do? im confused, i thought when bush fired him that was the right move, but that must be why im a douchebag. |
Did I not post in English?
Micheal Brown didn't run anything. |
|
|
| Billyfromsphily |
Quote: Originally posted by curleydan
i do understand that. i also understand that when all the shit about his real background came out he was fired. what i dont understand is why you guys seem to think that bush needs to be on the computer running background checks on all the federal employees. bush appointed him yes, but obviously someone dropped the ball on checking the guy out and just believed his resume.
and im not saying bush doesnt have the responsibility, for bringing him on, but he also did the right thing and canned the guy when he found out the truth. there is just no pleasing some of you. |
So Brown was the only candidate ?? Bush had to choose someone and he was the only one available ??
Its Bush's cronyism at its worst! |
|
|
| curleydan |
Quote: Originally posted by SaintJimmy
Did I not post in English?
Micheal Brown didn't run anything. |
did i not post in english? i said firing brown was the right thing to do and you called me a douchebag. am i missing something? |
|
|
| curleydan |
Quote: Originally posted by Billyfromsphily
So Brown was the only candidate ?? Bush had to choose someone and he was the only one available ??
Its Bush's cronyism at its worst! |
im sure there were more candidates than just brown. im sure there were better qualified candidates. i think we can all agree that the hiring of brown was based simply on his loyalty to bush and little else and it was a mistake. what seems to be escaping is that firing him was a good move and only the "bush apologists" seem to think firing him was a good idea. i guess the bush haters wish brown was still the fema chief. |
|
|
| curleydan |
Quote: Originally posted by Monster_Zero
Unbelievable!!!
I guess Bush isn't responsible for anything he does? WTF?!?!?
I can't believe you Bush apologists... how the fuck do you people get this way?!?! |
he is responsible, i said he was responsible and as a result of that responsibility he fired him. the only fact that seems to be in dispute is that firing brown was a good idea. i think it was, but thus far none of you bush haters have agreed with me. is it just impossible for any of you to agree with anything i say? if i post it you have to instantly hate it and start the name calling???? |
|
|
| SaintJimmy |
Quote: Originally posted by curleydan
am i missing something? |
Micheal Brown acted under the authority and direction of The Multi-Billion Dollar Department of Homeland Security and it's director - Micheal Chertoff who, by the way, is still running things.
Which part of this sentence are you having trouble with? |
|
|
| curleydan |
| i know what you are saying, brown worked under the dhs. what that has to do with him being fired i have no idea. if your point is chertoff should be fired too, then say that. but to call me a douchebag for saying brown being fired is a good thing makes no sense. |
|
|
| SaintJimmy |
Quote: Originally posted by curleydan
i know what you are saying, brown worked under the dhs. what that has to do with him being fired i have no idea. if your point is chertoff should be fired too, then say that. but to call me a douchebag for saying brown being fired is a good thing makes no sense. |
Brown was handcuffed, scapegoated, and then fired.
His boss (Chertoff) and the man who appointed him (Bush) are still in power.
Tell me again how this is a good thing.
:rolleyes: |
|
|
| curleydan |
| which would you rather have brown in charge of fema or not? |
|
|
| SaintJimmy |
Quote: Originally posted by curleydan
which would you rather have brown in charge of fema or not? |
Are you retarded?
What about this aren't you getting?
Brown was and is irrelevant.
Chertoff ran the show, and Bush appointed him, as well.
NOTHING has changed. |
|
|
| Halcyon |
I think curleydan is really Bush's right hand.... and I don't mean right hand man... I mean his right hand.... he's the one Bush is jacking off with...
I've never seen someone so on Bush's dick.....
Except Frankly.... that boy must be Bush's left hand. |
|
|
|
|
|
