SternFanNetwork
SFN Home SternFanNetwork Archive > Other Talk > Howard TV OnDemand

Note: This is a Text only archive. Go directly to the real forum.

Can you believe they fucked up the Shot when Richard licks sal's balls ! - Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics


banner

 
Can you believe they fucked up the Shot when Richard licks sal's balls ! - Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
ashey larry
These guys are terrible. Poor howard tv will never survive.
Da Truth
You really wanted to see a man's tongue to a man's balls more clearly? It's fine how it is.


HowardTV will survive as long or longer than Howard himself. :hw:
vicnamber
I can't wait to watch this!!!!
Johnny Fart-o
Yes I can believe it after they didn't show Gary getting squirted in the Fucking Machines episode. HTV crew aren't even qualified for porn because they can't get the money shot.
thermovox
Quote: Originally posted by vicnamber
I can't wait to watch this!!!!


no clear shot of the lick aside, it was a funny episode! :D
sXeChic
When Steve told Richard's parents that he licked them for only 5 seconds, that was more correct than the 10 seconds. Sal kept stepping back and Richard barely applied his tongue to Sal's balls. They should have looked at what got on HTV and told them to redo it and actually apply Richard's tongue to Sal's balls so they can be seen and applied.

IMO the first 23 minutes of the show should have had those two fans faces with a black block over them so they wouldn't have the pleasure of watching themselves on TV.
Drameshff11
Yea it was total BS.

They have 10+ fucking cameras in there and they cant get a shot? I saw more of Gary's wrist watch than anything else.

Was still a great, hillarious episode, but damn that camera work was awful.
Walker66
Gary's hairy arm blocked the whole shot. Good going monkey.
Mutt
I saw jason's still shots last night and he caught clear tounge on ball action.
sXeChic
Quote: Originally posted by Mutt
I saw jason's still shots last night and he caught clear tounge on ball action.


Where can we see them? :D
tm49
Quote: Originally posted by sXeChic
Where can we see them? :D


I think Howard said he wasn't posting them online because he wanted the bit to be exclusively for HTV.
Walker66
Quote: Originally posted by tm49
I think Howard said he wasn't posting them online because he wanted the bit to be exclusively for HTV.


You wouldn't see them even if he did post them online. All pics on Howard Stern.com are censored. You would just see a big blur. So in other words: You won't see them unless you have a show on Howard 100 or Howard 101 and can get Jason to show you the pics.
ShutupMoron
What makes any of you think they didn't purposely shoot/edit the episode the way it was released? I just assumed based on the way other shows have been edited that they would not show it uncensored. That's exactly what they did.
Nursegrrl8
it was enough for me! :lol:

sal pushed gary's arm into the shot.
m0tleyfan
i laughed my ass off,i just wish howard would quit telling them when to stop in the middle of a funny bit,when richard had the pudding in his eyes and will and sal were messing with him it was so funny. and howard was like guys stop i was like no don't this shit is funny.what he should do is blind fold richard and let them do it again.the part where richard hits sal in the nuts was both funny and painfull
CrashDMB237
Richard never licked Sal's sack. What horseshit.
Sir Squirtz
i think it was better off that garys wrist was in the way, the best part was how artie wrote 'gay stuff' in the check's memo
JD's iPod
Here's the deal guys:

HTV is not 100% "uncensored". They have to edit or shoot around anything that could be considered hardcore pornographic. They choose to edit and shoot strategically rather than mosaic anything (a more obvious sign of censorship.) That's why you didn't see the tongue on the balls, and that's why you didn't see the female ejaculation. Also remember in the Fucking Machines episode you also never saw direct, graphic shots of penetration... for the same reasons.

It's the same rules that apply to soft-porn channels on cable. You won't see those things there either.
tm49
Quote: Originally posted by JDs iPod
Here's the deal guys:

HTV is not 100% "uncensored". They have to edit or shoot around anything that could be considered hardcore pornographic. They choose to edit and shoot strategically rather than mosaic anything (a more obvious sign of censorship.) That's why you didn't see the tongue on the balls, and that's why you didn't see the female ejaculation. Also remember in the Fucking Machines episode you also never saw direct, graphic shots of penetration... for the same reasons.

It's the same rules that apply to soft-porn channels on cable. You won't see those things there either.


But didn't they get a close up of J Jaymes on the sybian with a large attachment while it was going in? They also showed a very graphic shot of Mary Carey laying on the couch pulling her lips apart for Will.
JD's iPod
Quote: Originally posted by tm49
But didn't they get a close up of J Jaymes on the sybian with a large attachment while it was going in? They also showed a very graphic shot of Mary Carey laying on the couch pulling her lips apart for Will.


There's a real fine line with this stuff. You can show a vagine but you can't show somebody's mouth touching it. They could shoot that from a side view though. Same goes for penetration.
Johnny Fart-o
Quote: Originally posted by JDs iPod
There's a real fine line with this stuff. You can show a vagine but you can't show somebody's mouth touching it. They could shoot that from a side view though. Same goes for penetration.


In Demand is full of porn.

Can You Be A Pornstar: Busty Contenders
Dirty Little Secrets: Naughty Bedroom Antics
Hot MILFs Bare All
Skin Flicks: Indecent Desires

If Howard TV aren't incompetent but liars instead then they should admit it.
gofyaself
Don't forget the "High Pitch Eric" segment where he was shown jerking off in close-up for about two minutes.

We've also seen things shoved up Sal + Richard's ass (Robin using a thermometer).

In this case I'm not complaining since it's man on man action, but many hot chick segments to this day, are still shot crappy (awkward angles, no puss close-ups, ill-timed cut-aways).
sXeChic
Actually yes some of Richard's tongue touching Sal's balls could be seen (when it actually touched them at the end)
Devil_Dog_Dre
Yeah that was some bad camera work. I like to get my money's worth
PeanutButter11
Quote: Originally posted by JDs iPod
There's a real fine line with this stuff. You can show a vagine but you can't show somebody's mouth touching it. They could shoot that from a side view though. Same goes for penetration.



Who the hell writes these rules?

Mary Carey's asshole and vagina was open for the camera. Are they trying to protect a kid or something from seeing penetration, never mind the fact she is spread wide open on a couch?


In the episode with the three girls doing dominatrix stuff (with Richard getting pasta sauce all over him) they showed a girl eating the other girl's ass (Sandra Romain) I guess it's a fine line indeed, but I dont understand the need for it. Might as well go all the way. None of this stuff should be for under 17 anyways to watch.
JD's iPod
Quote: Originally posted by Johnny Fart-o
In Demand is full of porn.

Can You Be A Pornstar: Busty Contenders
Dirty Little Secrets: Naughty Bedroom Antics
Hot MILFs Bare All
Skin Flicks: Indecent Desires

If Howard TV aren't incompetent but liars instead then they should admit it.


But it's not XXX porn, there's a difference.

Quote: Don't forget the "High Pitch Eric" segment where he was shown jerking off in close-up for about two minutes.

We've also seen things shoved up Sal + Richard's ass (Robin using a thermometer).


1) But he wasn't hard. They can show that.

2) You didn't see the actual penetration

Trust me, there are certain things they absolutely can't show.
HarryKeogh
Quote: Originally posted by JDs iPod
But it's not XXX porn, there's a difference.



1) But he wasn't hard. They can show that.

2) You didn't see the actual penetration

Trust me, there are certain things they absolutely can't show.


You are seriously mistaken.

1. There's no difference between X and XXX. Any film can rate itself X or XXX (unlike G, PG, etc...that's given to you by the rating board) you can read all about it here... http://www.4to40.com/earth/science/...ce_xratedmovies

2. There are plenty of cable systems that show hard-core porn. Penetration, money shots, oral, anal. The FCC has zero regulation over what they can show.

3. You can show a hard cock, flaccid cock...no difference. Personally, I prefer no cock.

4. Howard TV has shown a woman shoving a bong in her ass. They can certainly show a guy likcing a nut sack. Howard TV fucked up the shot and Richard gave it a very half-hearted effort.

Now if Howard has imposed his own restrictions on what he doesn't want shown on his channel is another story. But no government agency is restricting it.
Cowgurl
I was disappointed, I subscribed to HTV just to see this, and all I got to see was sal's and gary's hands. :(
JD's iPod
Quote: Originally posted by HarryKeogh
You are seriously mistaken.

1. There's no difference between X and XXX. Any film can rate itself X or XXX (unlike G, PG, etc...that's given to you by the rating board) you can read all about it here... http://www.4to40.com/earth/science/...ce_xratedmovies

2. There are plenty of cable systems that show hard-core porn. Penetration, money shots, oral, anal. The FCC has zero regulation over what they can show.

3. You can show a hard cock, flaccid cock...no difference. Personally, I prefer no cock.

4. Howard TV has shown a woman shoving a bong in her ass. They can certainly show a guy likcing a nut sack. Howard TV fucked up the shot and Richard gave it a very half-hearted effort.

Now if Howard has imposed his own restrictions on what he doesn't want shown on his channel is another story. But no government agency is restricting it.


But not all of them will. I've been on both Cox, Adelphia, Time Warner and they only show soft-core. And HTV wants to be accepted by all of them. I don't have proof of this but it seems obvious watching it over the last year that they are intentionally holding back on certain things.

Does anyone really think they "accidentally" missed showing the female ejaculation? Twice? No way. That was intentionally not shown.

I'd like to know if a HTV rep around here would actually comment on this.
tm49
Unless someone from HTV came on here & straightened this up we will never know for sure. I remember a similar argument a few months back saying no shows were allowed to be over 70 minutes because of an agreement with Sirius, but there have been a few shows over the past couple weeks that have been over that, including this one(83min). Either way, I still say this was a damn funny episode, very entertaining!
rageandcage
Quote: Originally posted by JDs iPod
But not all of them will. I've been on both Cox, Adelphia, Time Warner and they only show soft-core. And HTV wants to be accepted by all of them. I don't have proof of this but it seems obvious watching it over the last year that they are intentionally holding back on certain things.

Does anyone really think they "accidentally" missed showing the female ejaculation? Twice? No way. That was intentionally not shown.

I'd like to know if a HTV rep around here would actually comment on this.


Time Warner has hardcore porn. Insertion, oral, but no cumshots (at least on TW in columbus oh).

An HTV rep has posted several times in this forum, but has never really come out with an explanation of the censorship, as far as I have seen.
JD's iPod
Quote: Originally posted by rageandcage
Time Warner has hardcore porn. Insertion, oral, but no cumshots (at least on TW in columbus oh).

An HTV rep has posted several times in this forum, but has never really come out with an explanation of the censorship, as far as I have seen.


I guess I haven't seen TWC porn for a while, so that's not surprising.

But the point remains... if you've seen "soft core" before and you know what they limit that too, it seems more than obvious over many different episodes of HTV that they are drawing similar lines.

Your Ad Here

Powered by: Search Engine Indexer and vBulletin v2.3.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2002, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
All code and concepts property of iMonkey Inc.

This website is not affiliated with the Howard Stern Show. It is produced by fans for fans.
We share no connection with Howard Stern, Sirius Radio, On Demand, CBS Broadcasting, E! TV or Infinity Broadcasting.

All posts and attachments are the responsibilities of their owners and not of this site.