|
Note: This is a Text only archive. Go directly to the real forum.
Bushit "administration" now investigating 9/11 workers
- Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
banner
| Bushit "administration" now investigating 9/11 workers
- Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
|
| jetdog |
| The ones who were with Micheal Moore in Cuba, how will they punish these dying, sick Americans? I bet you dumbfuck Busheep on here will further embarrass yourself by somehow slamming the 9/11 workers. |
|
|
| Stickman |
Quote: Originally posted by jetdog
The ones who were with Micheal Moore in Cuba, how will they punish these dying, sick Americans? I bet you dumbfuck Busheep on here will further embarrass yourself by somehow slamming the 9/11 workers. |
If anyone involved utters a single question about 9/11, they are immediately deemed loons, stupid, idiots and conspiracy theorists. That's how it works around here. It doesn't matter if they saved lives, fought fires, or were in the military. A single question about 9/11, and they'll be trashed, just you watch. |
|
|
| Snoopyrules |
Quote: Originally posted by Stickman
If anyone involved utters a single question about 9/11, they are immediately deemed loons, stupid, idiots and conspiracy theorists. That's how it works around here. It doesn't matter if they saved lives, fought fires, or were in the military. A single question about 9/11, and they'll be trashed, just you watch. |
That's absolutely not true, again you're combining your stuipd conspiracy story with people that question the government, don't trust that the administration disclosed their failures leading up to 9/11, or weren't honest about the healt dangers at the site. They are not the same thing. The conspiracy story is stupid with all it's giant leaps to fill gaps, ridiculous explanations, and internet science. You're going to get very few people that don't believe they're sick. Just like common sense tells you planes full of jet fuel slamming into hollow designed buildings at full speed cause them to collapse, common sense tells you that pulverized metal, concrete, and whatever else is in 2 110 story 30 year old buildings will cause health issues.
This is a nice trick you keep trying. If you can distort it so that everyone who distrusts the government believes your nonsensical story, you can a) make it seem like the conspiracy loon numbers are greater than they actually are b) Keep people that don't believe in this dumb ass story from interjecting because they don't want to appear to be supporting Bush c) allow you conspiracy theorists to jump in what another stupid thought that pops in your bat shit loopy minds every time 9/11 is mentioned in any capacity (see your post above). |
|
|
| Stickman |
Ok so Snoopy answer this, what about the official story do you question? What about the official explanations don't make sense or are not backed up by evidence, that you would like to see exposed?
I'd like to hear your honest answer to this. |
|
|
| Snoopyrules |
Quote: Originally posted by jetdog
The ones who were with Micheal Moore in Cuba, how will they punish these dying, sick Americans? I bet you dumbfuck Busheep on here will further embarrass yourself by somehow slamming the 9/11 workers. |
Jetdog, do you believe the government pre-wired explosives into a powered down World Trade Center the weekend before the attack. Do you further believe that no plane hit the Pentagon, that in fact it was a missile. Do you also believe that the government dug a hole in PA and that there was no plane never a plane there as well (If you believe it was shot down by the government that's a different, and actually plausable conspiracy so exclude that scenario). Do you believe tha Larry Silverstein made the call when the buildings would collapse. Do you believe that Osama Bin Laden is a terrorist, or has he been working for the CIA his entire career. Do you believe there is such a thing as Al Qeda. These are some questions, answer honestly.
I ask this because I believe the air at the WTC site was bad and that those people are sick because of it. But this is a case of a crappy administration doing their usual crappy stuff. It's not evidence of a grand flawlessly executed massive conspiracy that required 1000's of people. |
|
|
| Snoopyrules |
Quote: Originally posted by Stickman
Ok so Snoopy answer this, what about the official story do you question? What about the official explanations don't make sense or are not backed up by evidence, that you would like to see exposed?
I'd like to hear your honest answer to this. |
I believe the Clinton administration did a good job preventing terrorism in the U.S. That administration arrested the blind sheik and way before 9/11 prevented a massive attack that was planned to blow up the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels as well as the Federal Building downtown. I believe what Clinton left Bush was adequate enough to possible prevent an attack, but because the Clinton people pulled the W's off all the white house typewriters and because the partisn devide was getting larger by the day over the 8 years of the very sucessful Clinton administration, the Bush people chose to ignore everything that wasn't theirs. Additionally, I don't think the Bush people really cared about terrorism as much as they should. I think day 1 was Iraq war planning and terrorism prevention was for another day. They failed miserabley to prevent that attack and that is the reason why Bush and Cheney wouldn't talk to the 9/11 commision seperately. They also knew the air wasn't good after the attack, but they desperately wanted to clean it up quickly to show resolve and to capitilize on the made for TV scenes (i.e. the Bullhorn). Everything that happened after the attack was posturing, and it was absolutely used to speed up the Iraq plans. |
|
|
| Stickman |
Quote: Originally posted by Snoopyrules
Jetdog, do you believe the government pre-wired explosives into a powered down World Trade Center the weekend before the attack. Do you further believe that no plane hit the Pentagon, that in fact it was a missile. Do you also believe that the government dug a hole in PA and that there was no plane never a plane there as well (If you believe it was shot down by the government that's a different, and actually plausable conspiracy so exclude that scenario). Do you believe tha Larry Silverstein made the call when the buildings would collapse. Do you believe that Osama Bin Laden is a terrorist, or has he been working for the CIA his entire career. Do you believe there is such a thing as Al Qeda. These are some questions, answer honestly.
|
I've proven many times in the past why you're a terrible poster and you are not fit to engage in these debates. Look at the questions you ask. This is the worst kind of leading questioning.
You foolishly and illogically stick to the idea that CD is impossible because more than one witness doesn't report powerdowns and prewiring. No one said that the WTC had to be powered down all at once. Can you not understand that any prewiring and power downs could have occured a few floors at a time over a few weeks. This could have happened years ago. How hard would that be to conceal, given the occupants of WTC 7?
No one said Silverstein made the call to implode WTC 7. The claim is he's lying on the PBS special about being called by the fire chief, but he slipped up when he admitted the building was "pulled."
There's something very similar about you and Billy. You're both juvenile, bitter and entirely unfunny. The only difference I can detect is that you know how to post a pic and Billy doesn't.
I'm not going to keep asking you questions, it's pointless to argue with you. |
|
|
| Stickman |
Quote: Originally posted by Snoopyrules
I believe the Clinton administration did a good job preventing terrorism in the U.S. That administration arrested the blind sheik and way before 9/11 prevented a massive attack that was planned to blow up the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels as well as the Federal Building downtown. I believe what Clinton left Bush was adequate enough to possible prevent an attack, but because the Clinton people pulled the W's off all the white house typewriters and because the partisn devide was getting larger by the day over the 8 years of the very sucessful Clinton administration, the Bush people chose to ignore everything that wasn't theirs. Additionally, I don't think the Bush people really cared about terrorism as much as they should. I think day 1 was Iraq war planning and terrorism prevention was for another day. They failed miserabley to prevent that attack and that is the reason why Bush and Cheney wouldn't talk to the 9/11 commision seperately. They also knew the air wasn't good after the attack, but they desperately wanted to clean it up quickly to show resolve and to capitilize on the made for TV scenes (i.e. the Bullhorn). Everything that happened after the attack was posturing, and it was absolutely used to speed up the Iraq plans. |
You didn't answer the question. You question what happened before and after 9/11. I'm asking what about the day of 9/11 and the official explanation that is not supported by evidence. Or is the entire story about 9/11, just as the gov't has said it is... |
|
|
| Snoopyrules |
Quote: Originally posted by Stickman
I've proven many times in the past why you're a terrible poster and you are not fit to engage in these debates. Look at the questions you ask. This is the worst kind of leading questioning.
You foolishly and illogically stick to the idea that CD is impossible because more than one witness doesn't report powerdowns and prewiring. No one said that the WTC had to be powered down all at once. Can you not understand that any prewiring and power downs could have occured a few floors at a time over a few weeks. This could have happened years ago. How hard would that be to conceal, given the occupants of WTC 7?
No one said Silverstein made the call to implode WTC 7. The claim is he's lying on the PBS special about being called by the fire chief, but he slipped up when he admitted the building was "pulled."
There's something very similar about you and Billy. You're both juvenile, bitter and entirely unfunny. The only difference I can detect is that you know how to post a pic and Billy doesn't.
I'm not going to keep asking you questions, it's pointless to argue with you. |
Accusing someonoe of posting leading questions is hysterical coming from you. How's the investigation going. You loons getting anywhere with this. You seem to have stalled. You guys should have a You Tube awards show; maybe that will generate some new intrest.
"pulled", that's so f-ing stupid it's hardly even worth fighting that weak ass evidence. The only thing dumber is that idea that you could load massive amounts explosives completely unoticed in 2 of the most visible buildings in the world unoticed. Oh wait, I forget the hole story, there is something dumber....you know, maybe I should definatively say what is the dumbest, since you keep opening your mouth. For that reason, it's subject to change. |
|
|
| Snoopyrules |
Quote: Originally posted by Stickman
You didn't answer the question. You question what happened before and after 9/11. I'm asking what about the day of 9/11 and the official explanation that is not supported by evidence. Or is the entire story about 9/11, just as the gov't has said it is... |
Here we go with this shit again. Is this where you talk about how versed you are with the official story, or is it time to pull say heat doesn't cause damage. You're so predictable. If you want to say what part of the NIST report is inaccurate you go right ahead. Why don't you just ask a real question and stop talking in riddles like some troll guarding a bridge. |
|
|
| Stickman |
Quote: Originally posted by Snoopyrules
How's the investigation going. You loons getting anywhere with this. You seem to have stalled.
|
Dr. Jones just released definitive empirical proof that the residue of thermates was found in steel samples.
William Rodriguez will be on The View on Thursday, with the LC guys.
LCFC is being financed by Mark Cuban and produced in Hollywood for a September theatre release.
An active Marine and many former and present military personnel are actively voicing their doubts about the official story.
I hardly think the 9/11 Truth Movement, (for lack of a better term) is stalled. The investigation is moving quite rapidly. |
|
|
| Billyfromsphily |
Quote: Originally posted by Stickman
Dr. Jones just released definitive empirical proof that the residue of thermates was found in steel samples.
William Rodriguez will be on The View on Thursday, with the LC guys.
LCFC is being financed by Mark Cuban and produced in Hollywood for a September theatre release.
An active Marine and many former and present military personnel are actively voicing their doubts about the official story.
I hardly think the 9/11 Truth Movement, (for lack of a better term) is stalled. The investigation is moving quite rapidly. |
Doubts are not conclusive evidence. |
|
|
| zimmie |
| You gotta feel sorry for these people. Pinning their hopes on Michael Moore's judgement indicates they are very sick. Being misled by him will probably cost them their lives. Oh well. |
|
|
| Billyfromsphily |
Quote: Originally posted by zimmie
You gotta feel sorry for these people. Pinning their hopes on Michael Moore's judgement indicates they are very sick. Being misled by him will probably cost them their lives. Oh well. |
They have a better chance of living than those who are being mislead and killed in an useless war started by Bush! |
|
|
|
|
|
