SternFanNetwork
SFN Home SternFanNetwork Archive > Other Talk > Politics & News

Note: This is a Text only archive. Go directly to the real forum.

Clintons Sell Possibly Troublesome Stock - Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics


banner

 
Clintons Sell Possibly Troublesome Stock - Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
DUDE-HERE
WASHINGTON (AP) - Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton liquidated the contents of their blind trust upon learning it contained investments of $5 million to $25 million that could pose conflicts of interest or prove to be embarrassing to her presidential campaign.
The blind trust and a bank account valued in the same range place the Clinton's total wealth at between $10 million and $50 million.

The Clintons had to disclose the contents of the blind trust in April under instructions from the Office of Government Ethics and sold the assets in May, according to a disclosure form filed Friday. The Clintons have had a blind trust continuously since 1993 and had no control over its transactions.

Over time, the Clintons' blind trust grew significantly and included stock holdings in oil and drug companies, military contractors and Wal-Mart.

The report, also filed with the Federal Election Commission, provides the most detailed look at the Clintons' holdings as their wealth has expanded since the former president left the White House in 2001.

The new report also shows that the former president made $16 million in speaking fees between January 2006 and Wednesday. So far this year, Bill Clinton has given 34 paid speeches for a total of $5.9 million.

The blind trust held stock in pharmaceutical companies, including $250,000-$500,000 in Biogen Idec and Johnson & Johnson and $100,000- $250,000 in Amgen, Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline. It also invested in General Electric and Raytheon, two leading defense contractors. The trust had a varied portfolio, with investments in numerous other companies, including Exxon Mobil, BP Amoco, Walt Disney and eBay.

The report said all the proceeds of the sales are being placed in a cash account. The massive unloading of stock means the Clintons face "substantial" capital gains taxes, Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson said.

President Clinton registered his blind trust with the Office of Government Ethics when he became president in 1993, then Sen. Clinton registered it as a Senate blind trust when she became a senator in 2001.

Wolfson said the Clintons now "will be working to create a new blind trust consistent with both OGE and the Senate's rules."

Though all the blind trust transactions were handled over the years by a trustee without the Clintons' knowledge, some of the holdings could have been awkward for Hillary Clinton as she pursues the Democratic presidential nomination.

The blind trust held stock worth $100,000-$250,000 in NewsCorp, the parent company of Fox News, which many Democrats have denounced as biased against them. The trust also held stock in Wal-Mart and Wal- Mart de Mexico.

The senator served on the Wal-Mart board from 1986 to 1992, and was close with the Walton family that created the nation's largest retailer. But she has recently called on the company to provide better worker benefits and last year her Senate campaign returned $5,000 to Wal-Mart's political action committee. At the time, Clinton campaign spokeswoman Ann Lewis said the money was returned "because of serious differences with current company practices."

Friday's report comes on the heels of Hillary Clinton's Senate disclosure report, made public Thursday, which only covered activity in 2006 and did not reflect this year's liquidation of the blind trust.

Clinton and other presidential candidates were required to file financial disclosure documents with the Office of Government Ethics by May 15. But Clinton, and Republican candidates Mitt Romney and John McCain asked for 45-day extensions because they all had blind trusts that the ethics office demanded be opened.

"As a presidential candidate, Senator Clinton was required to make her assets public," Wolfson said. "As a result, she had to dissolve her blind trust. Upon its dissolution, she and the president chose to go above and beyond what was required of them and liquidate their assets in order to avoid even the hint of a conflict of interest."

When it comes to family affluence, the reports show that the New York senator is the wealthiest of all members of Congress seeking the presidency. Among all presidential candidates, however, Republican Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, stands alone with assets of between $190 million and $250 million. Republican Rudy Giuliani and Democrat John Edwards have each reported assets of about $30 million.

Last year and this year, Bill Clinton earned fees from $100,000 to $450,000 speaking to such corporations as IBM, General Motors, and Cisco Systems, finance giants such as Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers, and trade groups such as the National Association of Realtors and the Mortgage Bankers Association. He also has been paid to speak to nonprofit or charity groups, including the TJ Martell Foundation, which finances leukemia research, Nelson Mandela's Children's Fund and, last March, to the Boys and Girls Club of Los Angeles.

Jay Carson, the former president's spokesman, said Clinton typically donates millions of dollars in free speeches to charities.



Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
DUDE-HERE
what i find the most intresting is him charging non-profits for speaking engagements nice guy

" He also has been paid to speak to nonprofit or charity groups, including the TJ Martell Foundation, which finances leukemia research, Nelson Mandela's Children's Fund and, last March, to the Boys and Girls Club of Los Angeles. "


shame on him
Reverend Tyler
I have a lot bigger problem with Hillary than Bill
DUDE-HERE
Quote: Originally posted by Reverend Tyler
I have a lot bigger problem with Hillary than Bill



whats is it ?
Reverend Tyler
Lots of things. Believe it or not, while from the right they view HIllary as eing a socialist, most progressives see her nothing more than a political opportunist of the worst kind. She will embrace any position that will make her more popular, seemingly never willing to stick to actual convictions. She voted time and time again to increase executive power, tearing down the balance of our Governmentr, and her special pet projects are to try and censor entertainment a la Tipper Gore. Fuck her in her asshole and ATM the bitch.
DUDE-HERE
Quote: Originally posted by Reverend Tyler
Lots of things. Believe it or not, while from the right they view HIllary as eing a socialist, most progressives see her nothing more than a political opportunist of the worst kind. She will embrace any position that will make her more popular, seemingly never willing to stick to actual convictions. She voted time and time again to increase executive power, tearing down the balance of our Governmentr, and her special pet projects are to try and censor entertainment a la Tipper Gore. Fuck her in her asshole and ATM the bitch.



yea ..now groups can't release a cd without that label. if its not there no one will buy it.

we are all about shock now
rod_jammer
These are all blue chip stocks...what is supposedly shocking here? At least they are putting their assets into a blind trust, instead of granting no-bid contracts to a company that they are receiving deferred compensation from.
artiel
Quote: Originally posted by DUDE-HERE
what i find the most intresting is him charging non-profits for speaking engagements nice guy

" He also has been paid to speak to nonprofit or charity groups, including the TJ Martell Foundation, which finances leukemia research, Nelson Mandela's Children's Fund and, last March, to the Boys and Girls Club of Los Angeles. "


shame on him


Hahaha... charging no-profits is a bad thing?

I guess you're in favor of socialism... Geez dude, make up your mind. Non-profit organizations also pay their CEOs in the 6 and 7 figures, I suppose we should not pay the CEOs either.
booybob
walmart
bp exxon
amgen pfizer glaxosmithklien
fox

wow, what hypocrites their money is placed in BIG OIL< BIG pharmicutial "sp",Big Retail, and FOX
haven't they been blasting these type of companies for years???
Sternposse
everytime Clinton pisses me off i remember he has a 3 inch crooked penis with a hairy mole on it and i LMFAO!!

he's just a sad joke of a man :rolleyes:
JTProcess
Quote: Originally posted by Reverend Tyler
Lots of things. Believe it or not, while from the right they view HIllary as eing a socialist, most progressives see her nothing more than a political opportunist of the worst kind. She will embrace any position that will make her more popular, seemingly never willing to stick to actual convictions. She voted time and time again to increase executive power, tearing down the balance of our Governmentr, and her special pet projects are to try and censor entertainment a la Tipper Gore. Fuck her in her asshole and ATM the bitch.


She's not hesitating to name drop ole' billy anymore either.
JTProcess
Quote: Originally posted by Sternposse
everytime Clinton pisses me off i remember he has a 3 inch crooked penis with a hairy mole on it and i LMFAO!!

he's just a sad joke of a man :rolleyes:


For someone who thinks Bill Clinton is a joke of a man you have studied his penis very carefully... why is that?
Crazytree
Quote: Originally posted by Sternposse
everytime Clinton pisses me off i remember he has a 3 inch crooked penis with a hairy mole on it and i LMFAO!!

he's just a sad joke of a man :rolleyes:


bullshit story propagated by DRUDGE because they knew he wouldn't deem it worthy of rebuttal.
Ass Boil
Hi "sternposse"!!

Tell your buddy Holy Elvis we said hi next time you look in the mirror!!
DUDE-HERE
Quote: Originally posted by rod_jammer
These are all blue chip stocks...what is supposedly shocking here? At least they are putting their assets into a blind trust, instead of granting no-bid contracts to a company that they are receiving deferred compensation from.



what amazed me was his charging non-profits to talk to them like the boys and girls club of los angeles who are financially strapped anyway. This shows me he is not very charitable unless he is getting paid for it
DUDE-HERE
Quote: Originally posted by artiel
Hahaha... charging no-profits is a bad thing?

I guess you're in favor of socialism... Geez dude, make up your mind. Non-profit organizations also pay their CEOs in the 6 and 7 figures, I suppose we should not pay the CEOs either.



no, you can charge them what you want but if is gonna help a charity why not be charitable yourself. they place his networth between 10-50 million. he doesn't have to charge them. its fine with me if he does. i just don't think he has good charictor.
JTProcess
Insider trading and shady stock deals happen by the hundred every single day.

You guys are pathetic looking for a democratic needle in a haystack of republican corruption.

Way to go.
DUDE-HERE
Quote: Originally posted by JTProcess
Insider trading and shady stock deals happen by the hundred every single day.

You guys are pathetic looking for a democratic needle in a haystack of republican corruption.

Way to go.



typical


your never allowed to discuss democratic corruption until you route out all republican corruption. thats great. funny. that is so childish
JTProcess
It's purely partisan... why don't you take that rage into the armed forces and use it productively?
Crazytree
Quote: Originally posted by DUDE-HERE
...the boys and girls club of los angeles who are financially strapped anyway.


you've seen their tax returns and know their revenue and reserves?

if not, shut up and stop making shit up.
DUDE-HERE
Quote: Originally posted by JTProcess
It's purely partisan... why don't you take that rage into the armed forces and use it productively?


why would i want to do that...i do that and then partison asswipes like you call me a failure and tell me i can't win.
DUDE-HERE
Quote: Originally posted by Crazytree
you've seen their tax returns and know their revenue and reserves?

if not, shut up and stop making shit up.



their reserves are for the children of los angeles. there are millions of kids they care for

you shut the fuck up. unless your like fuck those kids most of them are minorities anyway.
xloosescrewx
I wish there was a law that said: if you marry a politician, then you can't be a politician yourself. Eight years of Bill was enough.
harley-davidson
Quote: everytime Clinton pisses me off i remember he has a 3 inch crooked penis with a hairy mole on it and i LMFAO!!


:banplz: .....................
JTProcess
Quote: Originally posted by DUDE-HERE
why would i want to do that...i do that and then partison asswipes like you call me a failure and tell me i can't win.


Alright alright... you're not smart enough to be in the military. Even by today's lowered standards.
DUDE-HERE
Quote: Originally posted by JTProcess
Alright alright... you're not smart enough to be in the military. Even by today's lowered standards.


WELL, IF THE STANDARD ACCORDING TO YOU ARE LOW.

LOL

YOU SUPPORT THE MILITARY I SEE

LOL
harley-davidson
Sternposse......how ya do'in...... AKA...................>HOLEY ELVIS
DUDE-HERE
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson
Sternposse......how ya do'in...... AKA...................>HOLEY ELVIS


huh ?
mingmen
Quote: Originally posted by DUDE-HERE
huh ?

you make no points
we would rather out a mult
kmkomr
Quote: Originally posted by mingmen
you make no points
we would rather out a mult


shut up you stupid ass dinker. Dude Here is trashing all libs and they have nothing to argue in return so they resort to bullshit. Stupid ass libs.
harley-davidson
Quote: shut up you stupid ass dinker. Dude Here is trashing all libs and they have nothing to argue in return so they resort to bullshit. Stupid ass libs.


kmkomr
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson


hmmm, another good argument. You really should be banned because you post nothing but pictures and bullshit like this that takes up space. Go crash your Harley.
harley-davidson
Quote: hmmm, another good argument. You really should be banned because you post nothing but pictures and bullshit like this that takes up space. Go crash your Harley.


So you passed, you're a fucking idiot con-fucking-grats


here is your diploma >
Kill Van Kull
DUMB-HERE>>


Did you know that Howard Stern makes nearly a million dollars per show and some of his own whack-packers are so poor that they're hungry and homeless?

Do you really give a shit?

:rolleyes:
otherone4life
I love how only R's are allowed to be capitalists and GASP make money by investing (although the purpose of the BLIND trust is that others invested WITHOUT their input). Of course, if they DID NOT liquidate, the R's would have screamed bloody murder that they kept it. Meanwhile, Cheney continued to hold shares in HAL even as they were given BILLIONS in Iraq contracts ...give me a fucking break.
DUDE-HERE
Quote: Originally posted by mingmen
you make no points
we would rather out a mult



whats a mult ?
DUDE-HERE
Quote: Originally posted by kmkomr
shut up you stupid ass dinker. Dude Here is trashing all libs and they have nothing to argue in return so they resort to bullshit. Stupid ass libs.



thats true



when you wrong attack attack
DUDE-HERE
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson
So you passed, you're a fucking idiot con-fucking-grats


here is your diploma >



what post a photo of obama ?
zimmie
Kerry Ad Falsely Accuses Cheney on Halliburton
September 30, 2004
Contrary to this ad's message, Cheney doesn't gain financially from the contracts given to the company he once headed.

Summary
A Kerry ad implies Cheney has a financial interest in Halliburton and is profiting from the company's contracts in Iraq. The fact is, Cheney doesn't gain a penny from Halliburton's contracts, and almost certainly won't lose even if Halliburton goes bankrupt.
The ad claims Cheney got $2 million from Halliburton "as vice president," which is false. Actually, nearly $1.6 million of that was paid before Cheney took office. More importantly, all of it was earned before he was a candidate, when he was the company's chief executive.

Analysis
A Kerry ad released Sept 17 once again attacks Cheney's ties to Halliburton, implying that Cheney is profiting from the company's contracts in Iraq. That's false.

Kerry-Edwards Ad:
"Cheney Halliburton"

Cheney: I have no financial interest in Halliburton of any kind and haven't had now for over three years.

Announcer: The truth: As vice president, Dick Cheney received $2 million from Halliburton. Halliburton got billions in no bid contracts in Iraq. Dick Cheney got $2 million. What did we get? A $200 billion dollar bill for Iraq. Lost jobs. Rising health care costs. It's time for a new direction.

John Kerry. Stronger at home. Respected in the world.

Announcer: I'm John Kerry, and I approve this message.
The ad isn't subtle. It says, "As vice president, Dick Cheney received $2 million from Halliburton. Halliburton got billions in no bid contracts in Iraq. Dick Cheney got $2 million. What did we get?" And it implies that Cheney lied to the public when he said in a TV interview that "I have no financial interest in Halliburton of any kind."

But as we document here, Cheney has insulated himself financially from whatever might happen to Halliburton. The Kerry ad misstates the facts.

$2 Million

To start, the $2 million figure is wrong. It is true that Cheney has received just under $2 million from Halliburton since his election, but nearly $1.6 million of that total was paid before Cheney actually took office on Jan. 20, 2001. Saying Cheney got that much "as vice president" is simply false.

We asked Cheney's personal attorney to document that, and he did, supplying several documents never released publicly before:

A Halliburton pay statement dated Jan 2, 2001 shows just under $147,579 was paid that day as "elect defrl payou," meaning payout of salary from the company's Elective Deferral Plan. That was salary Cheney had earned in 1999, but which he had chosen previously to receive in five installments spread over five years.
Another pay statement dated Jan. 18 shows $1,451,398 was paid that day under the company's "Incentive Plan C" for senior executives. That was Cheney's incentive compensation -- bonus money -- paid on the basis of the company's performance in 2000. Cheney had formally resigned from the company the previous September to campaign full time, but the amount of his bonus couldn't be calculated until the full year's financial results were known.
Cheney's personal financial disclosure forms, together with the pay statements just mentioned, show that Cheney has received $398,548 in deferred salary from Halliburton "as vice president." And of course, all of that is money he earned when he was the company's chief executive officer. Cheney was due to receive another payment in 2004, and a final payment in 2005.

The Kerry ad isn't the only place the false $2 million figure appears. The Democratic National Committee also gets it wrong on their Web site. The dates of the Halliburton payments don't appear on Cheney's personal financial disclosure form from 2001, and the DNC assumed -- incorrectly as we have shown -- that all the 2001 payment were made after he took office.

Deferred Salary

The $398,548 Halliburton has paid to Cheney while in office is all deferred compensation, a common practice that high-salaried executives use to reduce their tax bills by spreading income over several years. In Cheney's case, he signed a Halliburton form in December of 1998 choosing to have 50% of his salary for the next year, and 90% of any bonus money for that year, spread out over five years. (As it turned out, there was no bonus for 1999.) We asked Cheney's personal attorney to document the deferral agreement as well, and he supplied us with a copy of the form, posted here publicly for the first time.

Legally, Halliburton can't increase or reduce the amount of the deferred compensation no matter what Cheney does as vice president. So Cheney's deferred payments from Halliburton wouldn't increase no matter how much money the company makes, or how many government contracts it receives.

On the other hand, there is a possibility that if the company went bankrupt it would be unable to pay. That raises the theoretical possibility of a conflict of interest -- if the public interest somehow demanded that Cheney take action that would hurt Halliburton it could conceivably end up costing him money personally. So to insulate himself from that possible conflict, Cheney purchased an insurance policy (which cost him $14,903) that promises to pay him all the deferred compensation that Halliburton owes him even if the company goes bust and refuses to pay. The policy does contain escape clauses allowing the insurance company to refuse payment in the unlikely events that Cheney files a claim resulting "directly or indirectly" from a change in law or regulation, or from a "prepackaged" bankruptcy in which creditors agree on terms prior to filing. But otherwise it ensures Cheney will get what Halliburton owes him should it go under.

Cheney aides supplied a copy of that policy to us -- blacking out only some personal information about Cheney -- which we have posted here publicly for the first time.

Stock Options

That still would leave the possibility that Cheney could profit from his Halliburton stock options if the company's stock rises in value. However, Cheney and his wife Lynne have assigned any future profits from their stock options in Halliburton and several other companies to charity. And we're not just taking the Cheney's word for this -- we asked for a copy of the legal agreement they signed, which we post here publicly for the first time.

The "Gift Trust Agreement" the Cheney's signed two days before he took office turns over power of attorney to a trust administrator to sell the options at some future time and to give the after-tax profits to three charities. The agreement specifies that 40% will go to the University of Wyoming (Cheney's home state), 40% will go to George Washington University's medical faculty to be used for tax-exempt charitable purposes, and 20% will go to Capital Partners for Education, a charity that provides financial aid for low-income students in Washington, DC to attend private and religious schools.

The agreement states that it is "irrevocable and may not be terminated, waived or amended," so the Cheney's can't take back their options later.

The options owned by the Cheney's have been valued at nearly $8 million, his attorney says. Such valuations are rough estimates only -- the actual value will depend on what happens to stock prices in the future, which of course can't be known beforehand. But it is clear that giving up rights to the future profits constitutes a significant financial sacrifice, and a sizable donation to the chosen charities.

"Financial Interest"

Democrats have taken issue with Cheney's statement to Tim Russert on NBC's Meet the Press Sept. 14, 2003, when he said he had no "financial interest" in Halliburton:

Cheney (Sept. 14, 2003): I've severed all my ties with the company, gotten rid of all my financial interests. I have no financial interest in Halliburton of any kind and haven't had now for over three years. And as vice president, I have absolutely no influence of, involvement of, knowledge of in any way, shape or form of contracts led by the Corps of Engineers or anybody else in the federal government.

Shortly after that, Democratic Sen. Frank Lautenberg released a legal analysis he'd requested from the Congressional Research Service. Without naming Cheney, the memo concluded a federal official in his position -- with deferred compensation covered by insurance, and stock options whose after-tax profits had been assigned to charity -- would still retain an "interest" that must be reported on an official's annual disclosure forms. And in fact, Cheney does report his options and deferred salary each year.

But the memo reached no firm conclusion as to whether such options or salary constitute an "interest" that would pose a legal conflict. It said "it is not clear" whether assigning option profits to charity would theoretically remove a potential conflict, adding, "no specific published rulings were found on the subject." And it said that insuring deferred compensation "might" remove it as a problem under conflict of interest laws.

Actually, the plain language of the Office of Government Ethics regulations on this matter seems clear enough. The regulations state: "The term financial interest means the potential for gain or loss to the employee . . . as a result of governmental action on the particular matter." So by removing the "potential for gain or loss" Cheney has solid grounds to argue that he has removed any "financial interest" that would pose a conflict under federal regulations.

Conflict of Interest

It is important to note here that Cheney could legally have held onto his Halliburton stock options, and no law required him to buy insurance against the possibility that Halliburton wouldn't pay the deferred compensation it owes him. Both the President and Vice President are specifically exempted from federal conflict-of-interest laws, for one thing, as are members of Congress and federal judges.

And even federal officials who are covered by the law may legally own a financial interest in a company, provided they formally recuse themselves -- stand aside -- from making decisions that would have a "direct and predictable effect on that interest." And Cheney says he's done just that.

Cheney says he takes no part in matters relating to Halliburton, and so far we've seen no credible allegation to the contrary. Time magazine reported in its June 7 edition that an e-mail from an unnamed Army Corps of Engineers official stated that a contract to be given to Halliburton in March 2003 "has been coordinated w VP's [Vice President's] office." But it wasn't clear who wrote that e-mail, whether the author had direct knowledge or was just repeating hearsay, or even what was meant by the word "coordinated," which could mean no more than that somebody in Cheney's office was being kept informed of contract talks.

Indeed, a few days later it was revealed that Cheney's chief of staff Lewis "Scooter" Libby was informed in advance that Halliburton was going to receive an earlier contract in the fall of 2002 -- to secretly plan post-war repair of Iraq's oil facilities. But being informed of a decision after it is made is a far cry from taking part in making it. And according to the White House, Libby didn't even pass on the information to Cheney anyway.

So to sum up, this Kerry ad's implication that Cheney has a financial interest in Halliburton is unfounded and the $2 million figure is flat wrong.
harley-davidson
Cheney's Halliburton stock options rose 3,281% last year, senator finds

RAW STORY

Print This | Email This

An analysis released by a Democratic senator found that Vice President Dick Cheney's Halliburton stock options have risen 3,281 percent in the last year, RAW STORY can reveal.

Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) asserts that Cheney's options -- worth $241,498 a year ago -- are now valued at more than $8 million. The former CEO of the oil and gas services juggernaut, Cheney has pledged to give proceeds to charity.


above graph released by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) charts the value of the Vice President's holdings in Halliburton in the past year.


Yep, he gave it all to charity....LOLhttp://rawstory.com/news/2005/Chene..._last_1011.html
DUDE-HERE
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson
Cheney's Halliburton stock options rose 3,281% last year, senator finds

RAW STORY

Print This | Email This

An analysis released by a Democratic senator found that Vice President Dick Cheney's Halliburton stock options have risen 3,281 percent in the last year, RAW STORY can reveal.

Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) asserts that Cheney's options -- worth $241,498 a year ago -- are now valued at more than $8 million. The former CEO of the oil and gas services juggernaut, Cheney has pledged to give proceeds to charity.


above graph released by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) charts the value of the Vice President's holdings in Halliburton in the past year.


so what
GE is tghe biggest stcok purchased by most congress people dem and repub..

?????????????????????????????????????

you figure it out


Yep, he gave it all to charity....LOLhttp://rawstory.com/news/2005/Chene..._last_1011.html
nunpuncher
i think the only stock in their portfolio they would want to hide would be walmart
the unions would not think kindly of this
but in retrospect after howard deans decision to pick colorado the union vote wont be as strong this year
i like all the rest of the stocks and own most of em myself
DUDE-HERE
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson
Cheney's Halliburton stock options rose 3,281% last year, senator finds

RAW STORY

Print This | Email This

An analysis released by a Democratic senator found that Vice President Dick Cheney's Halliburton stock options have risen 3,281 percent in the last year, RAW STORY can reveal.

Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) asserts that Cheney's options -- worth $241,498 a year ago -- are now valued at more than $8 million. The former CEO of the oil and gas services juggernaut, Cheney has pledged to give proceeds to charity.


above graph released by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) charts the value of the Vice President's holdings in Halliburton in the past year.


Yep, he gave it all to charity....LOLhttp://rawstory.com/news/2005/Chene..._last_1011.html



frank is one to talk...he made all his money in ADP and got a government contract for adp to do the gov payroll.

From $38,198,170 to $90,733,019
Ranks 6th among all members
of the Senate

Assets
Organization Value
132 W 125 Co LLC Office Bldg NYC $1,000,001
360 Park South Associates LLC-Office Bld $1,000,001
40 Worth Associates LLC (NYC Office Bldg $1,000,001
444 Realty Co Commercial Office Bldg NY $1,000,001
444 Realty Co School Bldg New York NY $1,000,001
Abrams Capital Ptrs II LP Investments $1,000,001
AGCO Corp $1,001 to $15,000
Agrium Inc $15,001 to $50,000
Alcoa Inc $1,001 to $15,000
Alerian Opportunity Ptrs LP-Inv $500,001 to $1,000,000
Alliance Resource Partners Investments $1,001 to $15,000
American Securities Ptrs II LP Investmen $15,001 to $50,000
Amerisourcebergen Corp $15,001 to $50,000
Anadarko Petroleum $15,001 to $50,000
Apollo European RE Fund II LP Investment $50,001 to $100,000
Apollo RE Investment Fund IV LP Purchase $500,001 to $1,000,000
Assurant Inc $15,001 to $50,000
Automatic Data Processing Inc $1,001,002 to $5,015,001
Bank Of America $101,002 to $265,000
Bear Stearns Money Market Obligation Tru $500,001 to $1,000,000
Bed Bath & Beyond $1,001 to $15,000
BNY Partners Fund CP Venture Capital $100,001 to $250,000
Boldwater Credit Opportunities Fund I LP $1 to $1,000
Boon's Dock II LP Real Estate Partnershi $1 to $1,000
Bristol-Myers Squibb $1,001 to $15,000
BTA Oil Producers LP-Oil & Gas Propertie $2 to $2,000
Candleglow Apartments $1 to $1,000
Cash $50,001 to $100,000
Cash Escrow Accounts Related To the liqu $15,001 to $50,000
Charlotte Russe Holding $15,001 to $50,000
Chester Apartments Real Estate Investmen $250,001 to $500,000
Christopher Banks Corp $1,001 to $15,000
Cigna Corp $1 to $1,000
CMS Co Invest Partners $15,001 to $50,000
CNH Global NY $1 to $1,000
Corn Products International $15,001 to $50,000
CRM Partners LP Investment $250,001 to $500,000
Darden Restaurants $15,001 to $50,000
Deere & Co $15,001 to $50,000
Dragon Inv Co III LLC Hong Kong Investme $50,001 to $100,000
Drawbridge Special Opportunity Investmen $250,001 to $500,000
Dune Real Estate Fund LP New York NY-Com $30,002 to $100,000
DuPont Co $1 to $1,000
Eagle Pass Assoc LP Shopping Mall $1,000,001
EMAX Partners LLC Investment Partnership $50,001 to $100,000
Enterprise 261 5th Ave LLC $1,001 to $15,000
Enterprise Alternative 3 Bridge Loan-53r $250,001 to $500,000
Enterprise Alternative II LLC-Intl Shipp $250,001 to $500,000
Enterprise Alternative One LLC Investmen $1,001 to $15,000
Enterprise Altrn 2 LLC Investment Pship $100,001 to $250,000
Enterprise Apartments $50,001 to $100,000
Enterprise Baysidee Assoc LLC $250,001 to $500,000
Enterprise Bedminster One LP $250,001 to $500,000
Enterprise Cheshire LLC $1,001 to $15,000
Enterprise Investment Pship $100,001 to $250,000
Enterprise Kennedy House Coop Apts $500,001 to $1,000,000
Enterprise Laredo Assoc Bear Stearns Mon $1,000,001
Enterprise LSL Assoc LLC $15,001 to $50,000
Enterprise Manor Assoc Office Building $15,001 to $50,000
Enterprise Peru LLC Shopping Cntr $50,001 to $100,000
Enterprise South Shields LLC $250,001 to $500,000
Enterprise-Angelene LLC $1,000,001
Enterprise-Denton Assoc LP $1,000,001
First Data Corp $1,001 to $15,000
First Union Real Estate $1 to $1,000
Founders Ensure LLC Private Equity Fund $100,001 to $250,000
Founders III LLC Investors Investment $50,001 to $100,000
FRL 1990 CRUT Stanley Bogen Blind Trust $1,000,001 to $5,000,001
FRL Bogen Trust Stanley Bogen Blind Tr $5,000,001 to $25,000,000
FRL Miller Trust David Miller Blind Tr $1,000,001 to $5,000,001
Genentech Inc $250,001 to $500,000
Health Management Inc $1 to $1,000
Health Net Inc $15,001 to $50,000
HSBC Bank $1,416,007 to $2,065,001
ICU Medical Inc $15,001 to $50,000
Interchange Bank $1,001 to $15,000
International Game Technology $1,001 to $15,000
Johnson & Johnson $1,001 to $15,000
JP Morgan Chase & Co $1,001 to $15,000
Kellwood Co $1,001 to $15,000
Kuroto Fund LP Investments $500,001 to $1,000,000
LCBS Park Ave Coop Apartment-New York NY $500,001 to $1,000,000
Leapfrog Enterprises $1,001 to $15,000
Lexington Towers Co Residential Real Est $100,001 to $250,000
Lifewise Assoc LLC Investments $100,001 to $250,000
Longview Funding Co Inc Mtg Invest $100,001 to $250,000
Mack Cali Realty $50,001 to $100,000
Manhatten Embassy Co Residential Real Es $100,001 to $250,000
Manor Vail Condo Association-Condominium $1,000,001 to $5,000,001
Marathon Oil $15,001 to $50,000
Mira Loma Assoc Mira Loma CA-Residentail $1,000,001
Morgan Stanley $1,001 to $15,000
National Loan Investors LP Investment Pa $500,001 to $1,000,000
Nautilus Group Inc $1,001 to $15,000
Net2phone Inc $1 to $1,000
New 40 Worth Co Office Bldg $1,000,001
NLI Mortgage Co $15,001 to $50,000
Nokia Corp $15,001 to $50,000
North Shore Assoc Investments $1,001 to $15,000
Northcastle Trust Investments $250,001 to $500,000
Och-Ziff Real Estate Fund $15,001 to $50,000
Oppenheimer & Co Inc Cash Account $250,001 to $500,000
Pacific Energy Ptrs LP Investments $1,001 to $15,000
Paloma Partners LLC-Hedge Fund $500,001 to $1,000,000
PAR Pharmaceutical $1,001 to $15,000
Penn Virginia Resource Ptrs LP Investmen $1,001 to $15,000
Pfizer Inc $1,001 to $15,000
Pond Equities Private Equity Fund $250,001 to $500,000
Prisma Select Fund II Mtg Sec $500,001 to $1,000,000
Private Client Resources LLC Investments $15,001 to $50,000
Prudential Financial $1,001 to $15,000
Quest Diagnostics $100,001 to $250,000
RCG Longview II LP $250,001 to $500,000
Rehabcare Group Inc $1,001 to $15,000
Riva Capital Partners $500,001 to $1,000,000
Rohm & Haas Co $15,001 to $50,000
Sandler Assoc Investments $1 to $1,000
Sigma Enterprises $100,001 to $250,000
Sire Ptrs LP NY NY Investments $250,001 to $500,000
Sovereign Bank $1 to $1,000
Special Opportunites Fund Investments $100,001 to $250,000
Special Value Bond Fund II LLC Investmen $250,001 to $500,000
Special Value Bond Fund LLC Investments $100,001 to $250,000
St Paul Travelers Companies $1,001 to $15,000
Sterling American Prop III LP-RE $100,001 to $250,000
Telesoft Coinvsts LP-Investments $50,001 to $100,000
Telesoft Ptrs II QP LP Investments $100,001 to $250,000
Telesoft Ptrs LP-Investments $100,001 to $250,000
Tetra Tech $1,001 to $15,000
Too Inc $1,001 to $15,000
Total Energy Leasing Corp Note Receivabl $500,001 to $1,000,000
Universal Compression Holdings $15,001 to $50,000
UnumProvident Corp $15,001 to $50,000
US High Yield Bonds $500,001 to $1,000,000
US Senate Federal Credit Union $1,001 to $15,000
US Treasury Notes Held In 444 Realty Co $250,001 to $500,000
US Treasury Notes Held In Enterprise Lar $1,000,001
US Treasury Notes Held In LCBS Corp $100,001 to $250,000
US Treasury Notes Held In The MSGT Partn $1,000,001
US Trust Co $15,001 to $50,000
Value Fund LP Hedge Fund $500,001 to $1,000,000
Wachovia Corp 2nd $1,001 to $15,000
Watson Pharmaceuticals $1,001 to $15,000
Winthrop Realty Trust $15,001 to $50,000
Worthington Industries $1,001 to $15,000
WP Fidelco LLC Office Building $100,001 to $250,000
Yorkshire Towers Co Residential Real Est $250,001 to $500,000
Zaro Group @ Banyon Ocean Twp NJ-Com $75,005 to $250,000
Zaro Group Lehigh Properties Ocean T $100,002 to $200,000
ZS AUL LP $50,001 to $100,000
ZS Cayman LP $15,001 to $50,000
ZS CO LP $1,001 to $15,000
ZS Crossover II LP $100,001 to $250,000
ZS Crossover LP $1,001 to $15,000
ZS Service Champ LP $1,001 to $15,000
DUDE-HERE
look up diane finestaein and her hubbys company URS. they have 2 iraq contracts. and 1 more under a diff company name . i forget. i guess she is like cheny and haliburton
dems could end the war but they don't . they could repeal the tax cuts now but they don't. could it be what repubs were doing was right and dems knew it but they needed political division in order to get back power.
acefree
Quote: Originally posted by DUDE-HERE
what i find the most intresting is him charging non-profits for speaking engagements nice guy

" He also has been paid to speak to nonprofit or charity groups, including the TJ Martell Foundation, which finances leukemia research, Nelson Mandela's Children's Fund and, last March, to the Boys and Girls Club of Los Angeles. "


shame on him


dude here is an anti-capitalist. shame
nikkyo
Quote: Originally posted by DUDE-HERE
whats is it ?


2 term president
DUDE-HERE
Quote: Originally posted by acefree
dude here is an anti-capitalist. shame



are u a fucking retard

you don't see a diff between charging non-profits as opposed to charging big companies. i know because you want to suck billys cock so he can do no wrong in your eyes.
whats even funnier is john kerry donates nothing to charity yet you think he cares about working people.


dems are their unintended consequences

Your Ad Here

Powered by: Search Engine Indexer and vBulletin v2.3.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2002, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
All code and concepts property of iMonkey Inc.

This website is not affiliated with the Howard Stern Show. It is produced by fans for fans.
We share no connection with Howard Stern, Sirius Radio, On Demand, CBS Broadcasting, E! TV or Infinity Broadcasting.

All posts and attachments are the responsibilities of their owners and not of this site.