|
Note: This is a Text only archive. Go directly to the real forum.
Uh Oh Lefties, Michael Moore Heading to the Dark Side
- Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
banner
| Uh Oh Lefties, Michael Moore Heading to the Dark Side
- Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
|
| Stickman |
Despite what you might think, Farenheit is NOT about an inside job. If anything it reinforces the official conspiracy theory. Moore obviously can't hide from the obvious anymore. Read the quotes in bold.
Michael Moore: 9/11 Could Be Inside Job
Discusses Explosions in Buildings, Demands '100 Angles' of Pentagon Video, and Calls for a New Investigation-- "They Haven't Even Told Us Half the Truth."
Aaron Dykes
Jones Report
Tuesday June 19, 2007
Academy Award winner Michael Moore answered questions on 9/11 truth during a sneak peak of his new documentary, SiCKO, in New York . Our reporters were initially avoided by Moore, but he subsequently decided to approach We Are Change.org/ Infowars.com reporters for a discussion.
Moore brought up his lingering questions on 9/11, which are a clear departure from the 'government negligence' picture he painted in his film Fahrenheit 9/11, released some three years ago.
Moore told reporters, "I've had a number of firefighters tell me over the years and since Fahrenheit 9/11 that they heard these explosions-- that they believe there's MUCH more to the story than we've been told. I don't think the official investigations have told us the complete truth-- they haven't even told us half the truth."
Michael Moore brought up the blackout of video at the site of the alleged Pentagon plane crash on his own, appearing quite willing to discuss subjects that so-called left gatekeepers have previously refused to raise questions about.
"I've filmed there before down at the Pentagon-- before 9/11-- there's got to be at least 100 cameras, ringing that building, in the trees, everywhere. They've got that plane coming in with 100 angles. How come with haven't seen the straight-- I'm not talking about stop-action photos, I'm talking about the video. I want to see the video; I want to see 100 videos that exist of this," Moore said.
He went on to imply the implausibility of a pilot executing the flight pattern of the flight that allegedly hit the Pentagon.
"Why don't they want us to see that plane coming into the building? Because, if you know anything about flying a plane, when you're going 500 miles per hour, if you're off by that much, you're in the river. So, they hit a building that's only 5 stories high...[unclear] that expertly. I believe that there will be answers in that video tape and we should demand that that tape is released."
Michael Moore was not vague or bashful in discussing 9/11 truth-- rather, he demanded a "new investigation before we get too far away from this-- to find out the whole truth."
"And I intend, in my own way, to find some answers," Moore added. "Thank you for doing whatever you're doing."
Amy Goodman, who was also at the premiere, cowered from a question that brought up the fact that she witnessed WTC Building 7 collapse-- she was seen on video during news coverage of the apparent demolition. She declined even a brief response, stating that an interview was about to begin.
Moore's most recent comments on 9/11 are a far cry from statements he made to Alex Jones during the 2004 RNC convention when he told Jones, tongue-in-cheek, that he didn't report on NORAD standing down because "it would be un-American."
This is a huge development in public figures going public with 9/11 questions-- particularly on the part of 'liberals' and others who identify with the 'left.' Despite overwhelming discontent with the Bush Administration, many such voices dismiss the importance of investigating 9/11 or simply decline to discuss any outstanding questions or relevant evidence. Noam Chomsky, for one, suggested that it "wouldn't matter" even if 9/11 had been hatched from a government plot.
Will the mainstream media continue to ignore the fact that the official story on 9/11 is all but dead, and more and more figures are coming forth to demand the truth? |
|
|
| johnsonrod |
| A fitting intellectual pursuit for such a formidable mind as his. |
|
|
| zimmie |
I wonder where those people on that flight are living now? Imagine giving up all your friends and family to promote George Bushs dream of beginning a war.
Maybe Moore's next film will be named "Whacko". |
|
|
| johnsonrod |
Quote: Originally posted by zimmie
I wonder where those people on that flight are living now? Imagine giving up all your friends and family to promote George Bushs dream of beginning a war.
Maybe Moore's next film will be named "Whacko". |
Those people are obviously still flying around......up there.
Still trying in vain to call there loved ones. |
|
|
| DUDE-HERE |
Quote: Originally posted by zimmie
I wonder where those people on that flight are living now? Imagine giving up all your friends and family to promote George Bushs dream of beginning a war.
Maybe Moore's next film will be named "Whacko". |
i ask that question all the time
where is barbara olsen. that they never answer. or they will tell you the planes were on remote control and the pilot had no control. |
|
|
| Oz |
Quote: Originally posted by zimmie
I wonder where those people on that flight are living now? Imagine giving up all your friends and family to promote George Bushs dream of beginning a war.
Maybe Moore's next film will be named "Whacko". |
hey, if they killed 3000 then what's an extra 200? |
|
|
| Stickman |
Quote: Originally posted by Oz
hey, if they killed 3000 then what's an extra 200? |
Exactly. Such questions are usually asked by people who have no real knowledge of the details. For instance, the "hijacked" planes were at about 25-40% capacity, whereas all other flights that day were 85% and over.
Check the flight manifests for some very interesting individuals and who they were connected to. |
|
|
|
|
|
