SternFanNetwork
SFN Home SternFanNetwork Archive > Other Talk > Politics & News

Note: This is a Text only archive. Go directly to the real forum.

Hillary is for NUKING Iran - Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics


banner

 
Hillary is for NUKING Iran - Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
booybob
I don't think she says this, but that is the jist of this youtube video.
Listen to her gravel and affirm her allegiance to AIPAC
click on the link to watch the video

http://www.informationclearinghouse...rticle18285.htm

1959- The US gives Iran a 5-megawatt nuclear reactor which became operational in 1967
Iran signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1968 and ratified it in 1970.
The Islamic Revolution in 1979 saw the overthrow of a CIA back Dictatorship-The Shah


Israel, a nuclear state, has never signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. By NOT declaring nuclear capabilities, Israel doesn't have to let inspectors in!

The Iranians took their own country back, to escape Britain and US control of their oil. And to rid themselves of a brutal dictatorship!

Iran isn't a threat to the US, nor is Iran a threat to Israel!
It's the US and Israel that has been threatening Iran!
Hillary Clinton is Pro-Nuclear-War!
She must be STOPPED!!!

Click on "comments" below to read or post comments
VacateTheWord
Thanks for posting this Booybob.

In an earlier thread, Ass Boil used this website as a reference to assert that Coalition Forces in Iraq have killed 1 million civilians. I tried to talk some sense into him, but he kept defending this nonsense.
Well, here is where "Information Clearinghouse" is coming from, laid bare for all to see - US and Israel bad, Iran good.
Forget Iran's proxies, forget they oppress their own people, forget they are building a nuclear bomb (remember that plutonium and enriched uranium found by the inspectors last year).

Nah, they are all about peace and love and welcome Israel into the world community with open arms.

Absolutely pathetic what is passed as a legitimate news source these days by people.

As for Hillary Clinton - I would chalk her "no options off the table" line to trying to show that despite being a female she will be strong on National Security. Everything that falls out of her mouth is carefully measured and rehearsed by her pollsters.
Abba
Quote: Originally posted by booybob
I don't think she says this, but that is the jist of this youtube video.
Listen to her gravel and affirm her allegiance to AIPAC
click on the link to watch the video

http://www.informationclearinghouse...rticle18285.htm

1959- The US gives Iran a 5-megawatt nuclear reactor which became operational in 1967
Iran signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1968 and ratified it in 1970.
The Islamic Revolution in 1979 saw the overthrow of a CIA back Dictatorship-The Shah


Israel, a nuclear state, has never signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. By NOT declaring nuclear capabilities, Israel doesn't have to let inspectors in!

The Iranians took their own country back, to escape Britain and US control of their oil. And to rid themselves of a brutal dictatorship!

Iran isn't a threat to the US, nor is Iran a threat to Israel!
It's the US and Israel that has been threatening Iran!
Hillary Clinton is Pro-Nuclear-War!
She must be STOPPED!!!

Click on "comments" below to read or post comments


I don't care which party is in power, or which candidates are running for President, the undisputed fact is that any viable candidate MUST pledge their fealty to Israel, or run the serious risk of losing untold millions in contributions, immesurable support from The Lobby and it's affiliate Pro-Zionist Christian groups, and losing the election.

Being Hawkish on Iran is an unfortunate part of US politics, since the road to elected office runs through Tel Aviv. You don't like your leaders being beholden to a foreign entity, complain about it. Let them know that their foreign alleigances are tantamount to treason against the United States, since in many obvious cases, the interests of Israel have been placed before those of the US.
JTProcess
Yet another reason she will not be the Dems nominee.... she would make a mighty fine VP though.
mb33139
Obama/Hillary FTW... so far at least.
NC-Stern-Mark
Quote: Originally posted by Abba
I don't care which party is in power, or which candidates are running for President, the undisputed fact is that any viable candidate MUST pledge their fealty to Israel, or run the serious risk of losing untold millions in contributions, immesurable support from The Lobby and it's affiliate Pro-Zionist Christian groups, and losing the election.

Being Hawkish on Iran is an unfortunate part of US politics, since the road to elected office runs through Tel Aviv. You don't like your leaders being beholden to a foreign entity, complain about it. Let them know that their foreign alleigances are tantamount to treason against the United States, since in many obvious cases, the interests of Israel have been placed before those of the US.


True dat.
nunpuncher
Quote: Originally posted by JTProcess
Yet another reason she will not be the Dems nominee.... she would make a mighty fine VP though.

wow what a thought 2 new yorkers rudy and hillary thats a weird ticket i like the way you think :D
ICE CUBAN
The only thing that could make me strap C4 to myself and run for the nearest gathering of people faster than Hillary being president is Giuliani being president.
VacateTheWord
Quote: Originally posted by JTProcess
Yet another reason she will not be the Dems nominee.... she would make a mighty fine VP though.


All of the polling, from individual states to the national polls, would disagree. She has built a commanding lead in the latest national poll - 48% (of people either who are registered Democrats or who say they plan on voting Democratic). This is going to be very hard for either Obama, Edwards or the rest of the field to overcome.

Hillary's nomination is inevitable.
Luther
Quote: Originally posted by VacateTheWord
Thanks for posting this Booybob.

In an earlier thread, Ass Boil used this website as a reference to assert that Coalition Forces in Iraq have killed 1 million civilians. I tried to talk some sense into him, but he kept defending this nonsense.
Well, here is where "Information Clearinghouse" is coming from, laid bare for all to see - US and Israel bad, Iran good.
Forget Iran's proxies, forget they oppress their own people, forget they are building a nuclear bomb (remember that plutonium and enriched uranium found by the inspectors last year).

Nah, they are all about peace and love and welcome Israel into the world community with open arms.

Absolutely pathetic what is passed as a legitimate news source these days by people.

As for Hillary Clinton - I would chalk her "no options off the table" line to trying to show that despite being a female she will be strong on National Security. Everything that falls out of her mouth is carefully measured and rehearsed by her pollsters.


Simpleton. :rolleyes:
VacateTheWord
Quote: Originally posted by Luther
Simpleton. :rolleyes:


Wow, you really got me.

Explain your accusation.
fatboy
US foreign policy states that no country with a secret nuclear power or weapons program can receive US aid -- therefore Israel can give back ALL the money in "grants" and "aid" it's accepted over the decades, and NO giving it back to US politicians in the form of bribes, graft and kickbacks doesn't count.

Israel is a rogue religious-nut country which routinely ignores UN sanctions and has nuclear weapons plus the missiles and submarines to deliver them. Be afraid. Be very afraid.
NC-Stern-Mark
Quote: Originally posted by fatboy
US foreign policy states that no country with a secret nuclear power or weapons program can receive US aid -- therefore Israel can give back ALL the money in "grants" and "aid" it's accepted over the decades, and NO giving it back to US politicians in the form of bribes, graft and kickbacks doesn't count.

Israel is a rogue religious-nut country which routinely ignores UN sanctions and has nuclear weapons plus the missiles and submarines to deliver them. Be afraid. Be very afraid.


Well, true dat too.

Good thing they like us.
WillowGlen
Quote: Originally posted by VacateTheWord
All of the polling, from individual states to the national polls, would disagree. She has built a commanding lead in the latest national poll - 48% (of people either who are registered Democrats or who say they plan on voting Democratic). This is going to be very hard for either Obama, Edwards or the rest of the field to overcome.

Hillary's nomination is inevitable.



I see something happening between now and then to cause her implosion.
VacateTheWord
Quote: Originally posted by WillowGlen
I see something happening between now and then to cause her implosion.


Something she will do (a verbal gaffe, for example) or an attack ad (or the like) from a competing campaign?

Keep in mind that she will be implying the "2 for 1" thing by dragging her husband out in the early primary states. She did so last week in either Iowa or New Hampshire (can't remember which one).

I don't see how Obama or Edwards can pull this off. The Clintons are a lot of things, and that would include being shrewd politicians who know how to win at all costs.
Halcyon
Quote: Originally posted by VacateTheWord
Something she will do (a verbal gaffe, for example) or an attack ad (or the like) from a competing campaign?

Keep in mind that she will be implying the "2 for 1" thing by dragging her husband out in the early primary states. She did so last week in either Iowa or New Hampshire (can't remember which one).

I don't see how Obama or Edwards can pull this off. The Clintons are a lot of things, and that would include being shrewd politicians who know how to win at all costs.

The only thing worse than Hillary for president, is Guiliani.

By far the two worst candidates. Truly a choice between a Turd Sandwich and a Giant Douche.
Luther
Quote: Originally posted by fatboy
US foreign policy states that no country with a secret nuclear power or weapons program can receive US aid -- therefore Israel can give back ALL the money in "grants" and "aid" it's accepted over the decades, and NO giving it back to US politicians in the form of bribes, graft and kickbacks doesn't count.

Israel is a rogue religious-nut country which routinely ignores UN sanctions and has nuclear weapons plus the missiles and submarines to deliver them. Be afraid. Be very afraid.



Israel is an overseas military outpost of the United States.
ChaseDC
Quote: Originally posted by VacateTheWord
All of the polling, from individual states to the national polls, would disagree. She has built a commanding lead in the latest national poll - 48% (of people either who are registered Democrats or who say they plan on voting Democratic). This is going to be very hard for either Obama, Edwards or the rest of the field to overcome.

Hillary's nomination is inevitable.


That's amazing! No one I know, nor myself, has been polled about this.

I'd like to see this "national" poll.
zimmie
Quote: Originally posted by ChaseDC
That's amazing! No one I know, nor myself, has been polled about this.

I'd like to see this "national" poll.


Do they have polls in DC?.......Does your delegate approve?
ChaseDC
Quote: Originally posted by zimmie
Do they have polls in DC?.......Does your delegate approve?


If it's a national poll, dolt, yes they do.

it's funny though, pinhead, I have been voting national elections here in DC since 1992, when I decided it was time for me to do so.

Your Ad Here

Powered by: Search Engine Indexer and vBulletin v2.3.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2002, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
All code and concepts property of iMonkey Inc.

This website is not affiliated with the Howard Stern Show. It is produced by fans for fans.
We share no connection with Howard Stern, Sirius Radio, On Demand, CBS Broadcasting, E! TV or Infinity Broadcasting.

All posts and attachments are the responsibilities of their owners and not of this site.