SternFanNetwork
SFN Home SternFanNetwork Archive > Other Talk > Politics & News

Note: This is a Text only archive. Go directly to the real forum.

Gay in School-cool with Dems - Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics


banner

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 
Gay in School-cool with Dems - Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
cunning lingo
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,298307,00.html
JTProcess
HA HA HA HA... I knew this was coming after that question last night.

Republicans are like...

"What you actually want to be upfront with your kids at an early age? And not lie to them and spread fear and hatred? THAT'S UNAMERICAN!"
cunning lingo
what age is appropiate to teach kids about gay sex?
ArivacaCharlie
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
what age is appropiate to teach kids about gay sex?

Whatever age you choose to talk to your kids about straight sex, you should be able to talk to them about gay sex.
I can't believe gay is still an issue in the US.
For an industrial nation, we are the most backward rednecks in the world.
Rike
Mandatory gay education for second graders is what freedom is all about.
cunning lingo
Quote: Originally posted by Rike
Mandatory gay education for second graders is what freedom is all about.


That's the problerm I have...More mandatory government bullshit....
JTProcess
One of my republican friends was really mad about Obama saying something about how he supported a form of sex ed for younger kids that would help them to recognize forms of molestation and sexual abuse...

Look it's really sad that we have to teach kids about sex at such an early age but look at the media... look at the world around you... you live in a fucking bubble if you think they aren't bombarded by it every day.

So you can live in denial and pretend they're not gonna hear about it on tv or on the playground or from the dirty kids at school but they are... so you might as well tell them the truth about it straight out and get on with your life.

I have a daughter who's in 3rd grade and she came home asking what "gay" meant over 2 years ago... we explained it to her and got on with our lives.
cunning lingo
That's not the point....I don't think it's the school's job to teach a kid about gay sex....period...Why is it even a issue?
Ass Boil
Quote: Originally posted by Rike
Mandatory gay education for second graders is what freedom is all about.


Yet somehow I bet you would be ok with them being force fed Christian bullshit, wouldn't you?
JTProcess
If you watched the debate and how they answered... they didn't say that it should be mandatory to read this book in school or anything... just that they try to teach their kids tolerance of all types of people at an early age...

Fox is trying to spin it into something like "THE DEMOCRATS WANT MANDATORY GAY SEX TAUGHT IN SCHOOL" and that's not at all what they said.
cunning lingo
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
Yet somehow I bet you would be ok with them being force fed Christian bullshit, wouldn't you?


Shows how much you fucking know....... are you deflecting or do just really hate christians that much? and to answer your question, I think religion shouldn't be a fucking issue either.
Ass Boil
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
That's not the point....I don't think it's the school's job to teach a kid about gay sex....period...Why is it even a issue?


Do you approve of them teaching the facts of hetero sex?
cunning lingo
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
Do you approve of them teaching the facts of hetero sex?


Teaching an age appropiate group of kids "sex" education has been going on for years, telling second graders ( 6 year olds) gay fairy tales is bullshit.....

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/...storyId=5366521
Ass Boil
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
Shows how much you fucking know....... are you deflecting or do just really hate christians that much? and to answer your question, I think religion shouldn't be a fucking issue either.


All religion is for the retarded. If that includes you, I am sorry.

But many of the people who are against sex ed are FOR inserting more religion into school, etc.
cunning lingo
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
All religion is for the retarded. If that includes you, I am sorry.

But many of the people who are against sex ed are FOR inserting more religion into school, etc.


If all religion is retarded to you , you must have a real issue with who to vote for. Every candidate running has a church affiliation. No athiests in the bunch there bub....good luck with that.
Ass Boil
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
Teaching an age appropiate group of kids "sex" education has been going on for years, telling second graders ( 6 year olds) gay fairy tales is bullshit.....

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/...storyId=5366521


Just out of curiosity, what specifically is your problem with the story?
cunning lingo
Try re-reading what you quoted......
Ass Boil
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
Try re-reading what you quoted......


Let me guess: "gay" fairy tales?

What about "hetero" fairy tales?

Is there sex in the story?
cunning lingo
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
Let me guess: "gay" fairy tales?

What about "hetero" fairy tales?

Is there sex in the story?


I can understand your concern , especially if your gay. I don't think this should be an issue in a second grade class. I don't think second graders are mature enough to be taught this kind of stuff, and if it absolutly needs to be, then that kids family can make that choice...
Ass Boil
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
I can understand your concern , especially if your gay. I don't think this should be an issue in a second grade class. I don't think second graders are mature enough to be taught this kind of stuff, and if it absolutly needs to be, then that kids family can make that choice...


I am not gay, but I fail to see the harm the story would do to anyone hearing it. I am still waiting for you to explain what is in the story that should not be heard.

Keep in mind children are much more tolerant than the average hate-filled republican :p
cunning lingo
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
I am not gay, but I fail to see the harm the story would do to anyone hearing it. I am still waiting for you to explain what is in the story that should not be heard.

Keep in mind children are much more tolerant than the average hate-filled republican :p


How is that "Anyone who embraces religion is retarded" working for you , on deciding a candidate? You never did answer.....
Halcyon
Ass Boil, some people are just truly scared to embrace their gayness.

Don't badger cunning lingo, he'll come out of the closet as soon as he's ready. Some people take longer than others.

Until then, you're not going to convince his self-hating ass to admit that there's nothing wrong with being gay, or that children won't be scarred by hearing the word.
cunning lingo
Another fucking genius......calm down Andy , I don't hate gays, your safe..... I 'm merely stating , if we're going to re-write the rule constantly, let's fucking do it right. Let's get rid of all gods, religions, sex, - anything that has controversy. Where , exactly do you draw the line?
Ass Boil
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
How is that "Anyone who embraces religion is retarded" working for you , on deciding a candidate? You never did answer.....


Religion IS retarded. Needing to believe in some afterlife reward for being a good person NOW is a retarded notion.

It might help if you could maybe go ahead and prove the existence of god for us, though.... :p
Ass Boil
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
Another fucking genius......calm down Andy , I don't hate gays, your safe..... I 'm merely stating , if we're going to re-write the rule constantly, let's fucking do it right. Let's get rid of all gods, religions, sex, - anything that has controversy. Where , exactly do you draw the line?


Actually it is only the people on YOUR side who still find homosexuality to be "controversial"....

LOL
zimmie
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
How is that "Anyone who embraces religion is retarded" working for you , on deciding a candidate? You never did answer.....


lmao.......you can trace his politics back to when he was shitting green and saying sketty and he'll never admit to supporting a candidate....a first class weasel...classic bullshitter....
cunning lingo
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
Religion IS retarded. Needing to believe in some afterlife reward for being a good person NOW is a retarded notion.

It might help if you could maybe go ahead and prove the existence of god for us, though.... :p


See, that's where you and I differ... You get mad , get offended and look down on people that don't agree with your "belief" system. I could give a fuck if your gay, a muslim, a christian or anything else .... just don't shove your shit down me/my family's throat....

How about that candidate thing.....you ever gonna answer that?
cunning lingo
Quote: Originally posted by zimmie
lmao.......you can trace his politics back to when he was shitting green and saying sketty and he'll never admit to supporting a candidate....a first class weasel...classic bullshitter....


So you mean he got the name "Ass Boil" from sitting on the fence for so long?
Ass Boil
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
See, that's where you and I differ... You get mad , get offended and look down on people that don't agree with your "belief" system. I could give a fuck if your gay, a muslim, a christian or anything else .... just don't shove your shit down me/my family's throat....

How about that candidate thing.....you ever gonna answer that?


You think I'm "mad" and "offended"? LOL!!!

Compared to the Republican candidates who are forced to swear allegiance to the Christian right on a daily basis, the Democrats are only mildly retarded....
Ass Boil
Quote: Originally posted by zimmie
lmao.......you can trace his politics back to when he was shitting green and saying sketty and he'll never admit to supporting a candidate....a first class weasel...classic bullshitter....


Bwaaaaahahahahahahahaha!!!!

Being called a "weasel" and a "bullshitter" by the guy who says he served in the military at age 3 is just pure comedic gold!

Thanks for the laugh, douchebag!
ChaseDC
Quote: Originally posted by ArivacaCharlie

I can't believe gay is still an issue in the US.
For an industrial nation, we are the most backward rednecks in the world.


It's still an issue because REPUBLICANS are the most backward rednecks in the world. Maybe I should say the overwhelming majority of republicans.
Ignorance breeds ignorance and it doesn't discriminate.
cunning lingo
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
You think I'm "mad" and "offended"? LOL!!!

Compared to the Republican candidates who are forced to swear allegiance to the Christian right on a daily basis, the Democrats are only mildly retarded....


So , again, no answer to the question? Just a lot of big talk with no solution? Pretty cunty if you ask me...good luck with that....
ChaseDC
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
That's not the point....I don't think it's the school's job to teach a kid about gay sex....period...Why is it even a issue?


Most times the schools have to teach sex ed (perhaps even homosexuality) and things like drug education to students because the "parents" are unwilling or unable to.
ChaseDC
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
Let me guess: "gay" fairy tales?

What about "hetero" fairy tales?

Is there sex in the story?


The last question raises a good point. Is the fairy tale about a gay sex?
ChaseDC
Quote: Originally posted by zimmie
lmao.......you can trace his politics back to when he was shitting green and saying sketty and he'll never admit to supporting a candidate....a first class weasel...classic bullshitter....


liar zimmie calling someone else a weasel and bullshitter. Classic!

Hey dimmie, my son is 3 1/2. Is he too old to join your infant military?
cunning lingo
Quote: Originally posted by ChaseDC
liar zimmie calling someone else a weasel and bullshitter. Classic!

Hey dimmie, my son is 3 1/2. Is he too old to join your infant military?


At what age is your son's school going to teach him the difference between gay and non-gay?
Rike
Quote: Originally posted by ChaseDC
liar zimmie calling someone else a weasel and bullshitter. Classic!

Hey dimmie, my son is 3 1/2. Is he too old to join your infant military?


Poor child. Are you going to enlighten him on the joys of assfucking or are you going to wait a couple years for his school do it?
harley-davidson
Halcyon
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
Another fucking genius......calm down Andy , I don't hate gays, your safe..... I 'm merely stating , if we're going to re-write the rule constantly, let's fucking do it right. Let's get rid of all gods, religions, sex, - anything that has controversy. Where , exactly do you draw the line?
:lol::lol::lol:

Guy spends two pages spewing homophobia and then tells me to calm down.

Awesome.
cunning lingo
Where , exactly, does it state I'm a homophobe, bub?
ChaseDC
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
At what age is your son's school going to teach him the difference between gay and non-gay?


Whichever age is deemed appropriate by the school board.
However, when if he asks what gay means, or what homosexuals are, I am not going to stammer, stutter and change the subject. too many republicans in this country think we should hide things from the children. They are smarter than everyone gives them credit for.
ChaseDC
Quote: Originally posted by Rike
Poor child. Are you going to enlighten him on the joys of assfucking or are you going to wait a couple years for his school do it?


I figure I'd pm you and you could show him.
Fagots like you are a dime a dozen though.

btw, shitbag. I already know my son is light years ahead of you when it comes to intelligence.
Reed Rothchild
All I can say is, Thank God for Tim Russert, for making sure that Americans are talking more about the really, really, really important, make or break, issues that this country is facing today. Bra-fucking-vo Mr. Tim.
Ass Boil
Quote: Originally posted by Rike
Poor child. Are you going to enlighten him on the joys of assfucking or are you going to wait a couple years for his school do it?


Is that what the story was about? Or are you so scared (or curious) of the word "gay" that your mind immediately thinks about gay sex when you hear it?
ChaseDC
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
Is that what the story was about? Or are you so scared (or curious) of the word "gay" that your mind immediately thinks about gay sex when you hear it?


Well, he is a closet self hating fagot. So I guess the answer is yes.
Ass Boil
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
So , again, no answer to the question? Just a lot of big talk with no solution? Pretty cunty if you ask me...good luck with that....


The answer was in my last post, asswipe.

The Democratic candidates are not clamoring to bend over for the Christian radicals in this country like the Republicans are. I will have no problem with this issue when I vote in 2008.

Now maybe you can attempt to answer SOME of the many questions you have been ignoring?

Was there any sex in the story? Are you offended by "hetero" fairy tales?
tourette_ticker
Quote: Originally posted by ChaseDC
Whichever age is deemed appropriate by the school board.
However, when if he asks what gay means, or what homosexuals are, I am not going to stammer, stutter and change the subject. too many republicans in this country think we should hide things from the children. They are smarter than everyone gives them credit for.


Not only are they smarter than they are given credit for, they are far less concerned about these things than adults. They really don't care unless the parents put a fear of homosexuality into them.

About a year ago my son was to go to the birthday party of a kid from a gay household. Before he went I asked him (8 at the time) if he knew what gay was and if he knew that his friends parents were gay. He told me sure it just means that Josh has two dads. What issue?
Ass Boil
Quote: Originally posted by tourette_ticker
Not only are they smarter than they are given credit for, they are far less concerned about these things than adults. They really don't care unless the parents put a fear of homosexuality into them.

About a year ago my son was to go to the birthday party of a kid from a gay household. Before he went I asked him (8 at the time) if he knew what gay was and if he knew that his friends parents were gay. He told me sure it just means that Josh has two dads. What issue?


Exactly. Paranoid Republicans are projecting their intolerance onto those kids. The kids don't care.
ChaseDC
Quote: Originally posted by tourette_ticker
Not only are they smarter than they are given credit for, they are far less concerned about these things than adults. They really don't care unless the parents put a fear of homosexuality into them.

About a year ago my son was to go to the birthday party of a kid from a gay household. Before he went I asked him (8 at the time) if he knew what gay was and if he knew that his friends parents were gay. He told me sure it just means that Josh has two dads. What issue?



Absolutely. There is NONE.
Halcyon
Quote: Originally posted by tourette_ticker
Not only are they smarter than they are given credit for, they are far less concerned about these things than adults. They really don't care unless the parents put a fear of homosexuality into them.

About a year ago my son was to go to the birthday party of a kid from a gay household. Before he went I asked him (8 at the time) if he knew what gay was and if he knew that his friends parents were gay. He told me sure it just means that Josh has two dads. What issue?

Kids will always model their parents behavior.

The homophobes like cunning lingo are just running scared.
Jeton
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
Where , exactly, does it state I'm a homophobe, bub?



you have meticulously avoided describing the specific elements of the story in question, and what EXACTLY you find offensive or harmful about it. your gauzy abstractions are a clear indication that you have no actual argument, only inchoate bigotry.


perhaps i'm wrong tho...BE AT LEAST AS METICULOUS IN DESCRIBING YOUR ACTUAL OBJECTIONS AS YOU HAVE BEEN IN AVOIDING DESCRIBING THEM.

tia:hw:
Halcyon
Quote: Originally posted by Jeton
you have meticulously avoided describing the specific elements of the story in question, and what EXACTLY you find offensive or harmful about it. your gauzy abstractions are a clear indication that you have no actual argument, only inchoate bigotry.


perhaps i'm wrong tho...BE AT LEAST AS METICULOUS IN DESCRIBING YOUR ACTUAL OBJECTIONS AS YOU HAVE BEEN IN AVOIDING DESCRIBING THEM.

tia:hw:

You will be sadly disappointed by him :hw:
cunning lingo
Quote: Originally posted by Jeton
you have meticulously avoided describing the specific elements of the story in question, and what EXACTLY you find offensive or harmful about it. your gauzy abstractions are a clear indication that you have no actual argument, only inchoate bigotry.


perhaps i'm wrong tho...BE AT LEAST AS METICULOUS IN DESCRIBING YOUR ACTUAL OBJECTIONS AS YOU HAVE BEEN IN AVOIDING DESCRIBING THEM.

tia:hw:


I DONT THINK THE SCHOOL SHOULD BE INVOLVED WITH DECIDEING IF A SECOND GRADER SHOULD UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GAY , AND WHAT IS NOT GAY. I DONT THINK GAYNESS OR NON_GAYNESS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED AT THE SECOND GRADE LEVEL. I DONT THINK IT NEEDS TO BE INTRODUCED AT THE SECOND GRADE LEVEL.

Now you can continue to lash out like a bunch of fucking cunts, or you can try to understand what I've been trying to say. The school shouldn't be involved . Period. And introducing a gay book , because the gays want thier hand in it, is no different than the fucking christians wanting prayer......
Ass Boil
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
I DONT THINK THE SCHOOL SHOULD BE INVOLVED WITH DECIDEING IF A SECOND GRADER SHOULD UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GAY , AND WHAT IS NOT GAY. I DONT THINK GAYNESS OR NON_GAYNESS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED AT THE SECOND GRADE LEVEL. I DONT THINK IT NEEDS TO BE INTRODUCED AT THE SECOND GRADE LEVEL.

Now you can continue to lash out like a bunch of fucking cunts, or you can try to understand what I've been trying to say. The school shouldn't be involved . Period. And introducing a gay book , because the gays want thier hand in it, is no different than the fucking christians wanting prayer......


Bwaaaahahahahahahaha!!!!

Again we have come full circle and you expose yourself. Being gay is only controversial to paranoid, hateful pussies like you. To the kids and to everyone else it is just another story. A story that we are still waiting for YOU to explain why it should not be told in a school.

Or you can just tell the truth and admit you know NOTHING about the story in question and are just crying about the gays like a good Republicunt.
cunning lingo
Wow, fucking knothead's still at it......go ahead and call me all the little names you can think of..I know it makes pussys like you feel tough. Why don't you go out and protest some military funerals why your at you cunt.
Ass Boil
You called everyone who disagrees with you "cunts", you fucking hypocritical asshole.

Now answer some of the questions you have been asked or crawl back under your rock.

LOL

And PS, the people protesting military funerals are fundy Christian freaks. You know, the "god hates fags" church.... it's the same people, dipshit.
cunning lingo
No, your the only one I find a cunt here. Has nothing to do with agreeing on a subject. It's how you handle it, and I find you handling things like a cunt.

As far as answering any more questions from you , I not sure how to be any clearer on where I stand. Your cuntiness is bouncing all over the place.
ArivacaCharlie
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
That's not the point....I don't think it's the school's job to teach a kid about gay sex....period...Why is it even a issue?

Unfortunately, schools are sometimes put in the position of doing things that are traditionally the duties of the parent. It's a shame because, frankly, I don't know that many teachers whose opinions I have a great deal of respect for.
But, parents just seem to bury their heads in the sand and pretend that "uncomfortable" things just don't exist. The schools have to pick up the slack and, frankly, they don't always do the best thing.
This is the fault of the parents for not doing their jobs and raising their kids.
ArivacaCharlie
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
I DONT THINK THE SCHOOL SHOULD BE INVOLVED WITH DECIDEING IF A SECOND GRADER SHOULD UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GAY , AND WHAT IS NOT GAY. I DONT THINK GAYNESS OR NON_GAYNESS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED AT THE SECOND GRADE LEVEL. I DONT THINK IT NEEDS TO BE INTRODUCED AT THE SECOND GRADE LEVEL.

Now you can continue to lash out like a bunch of fucking cunts, or you can try to understand what I've been trying to say. The school shouldn't be involved . Period. And introducing a gay book , because the gays want thier hand in it, is no different than the fucking christians wanting prayer......

Christianity is a religious CHOICE.
Homosexuality is a physical FACT.
Schools present facts. Homosexuality, being a fact, falls into the necessary duties of public education.
cunning lingo
Quote: Originally posted by ArivacaCharlie
Christianity is a religious CHOICE.
Homosexuality is a physical FACT.
Schools present facts. Homosexuality, being a fact, falls into the necessary duties of public education.


I will agree with , in part , on that....but do you find it necessary to explain that to a 6 year old?
ArivacaCharlie
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
I will agree with , in part , on that....but do you find it necessary to explain that to a 6 year old?

If the 6 yrs old asks, YES.
Halcyon
:no: Hateful homophobes scared of telling kids about gay sex. So sad.
Ass Boil
CL,

I didn't ask you to clarify your position for me, you fucking idiot, I asked you to explain WHAT part of the story was so offensive or controversial that it cannot be read to the children?

You are simply being asked to support your stupidity with some examples and judging by the fact that you refuse to do so, we can only assume you have never even read the story in question, therefore have no reason for being such a stupid fuck about this other than your personal hatred of others.

Just admit you have never read the story we are talking about. Is there sex in the story? What part of it is too hard for a second grader to understand? What shouldn't they see?

Be specific.
jtheweirdo
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
That's not the point....I don't think it's the school's job to teach a kid about gay sex....period...Why is it even a issue?

Is it the gay part of it that you have a problem with or just the schools shouldn't being teaching any sex ed at all?
cunning lingo
Let me try to explain this as simply as possible.

I don't think 6 YEAR OLDS are ready for sex education.
I don't think 6 YEAR OLDS are ready to discuss gay / non-gay relationships.

I don't think the school should get involved at those levels,( 2nd Grade) It should be up to the parents.

MY PROBLEM IS THAT THESE ARE 2nd GRADERS
Ass Boil
One more time I will ask this:

IS THERE SEX IN THE STORY?

What part of this story do YOU think the kids won't understand?

How many times do you need to be asked?
Ass Boil
CL thinks because HIS mind immediately thinks of gay sex when he sees this story, that is where the kids go also........ :p
cunning lingo
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
CL thinks because HIS mind immediately thinks of gay sex when he sees this story, that is where the kids go also........ :p


Read the book, and you tell me if it's Ok for second graders..... Then we'll discuss further. I hardly doubt you have kids, but I do hope you and your sidnificant other/husband get to adopt one. There are a lot of kids in need of a home, and it may settle you down a bit.
Ass Boil
Awwww..... That's cute. Except I'm not the one who has a problem with the story. YOU are. And now you are too much of a pussy to admit you have been crying about a story you have never read.

YOU are the one criticizing the story, the burden of proof is on YOU, asshole.
Halcyon
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
Awwww..... That's cute. Except I'm not the one who has a problem with the story. YOU are. And now you are too much of a pussy to admit you have been crying about a story you have never read.

YOU are the one criticizing the story, the burden of proof is on YOU, asshole.


LAUGH!! He probably has a problem with the "Tortoise and the Hare" because the Rabbit takes a nap in the warm sun, and the sun could be unusually warm because of Global Warming, and he doesn't think that's the right message to teach his kids :rofl:
cunning lingo
Wow....you two get together much? I sure you guys/gals look good together in the local parades......douchbags
ArivacaCharlie
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
Let me try to explain this as simply as possible.

I don't think 6 YEAR OLDS are ready for sex education.
I don't think 6 YEAR OLDS are ready to discuss gay / non-gay relationships.
Wrong. Their minds are like sponges at that age. Actually, it's a perfect age to teach them about sex IF they show curiosity about it at that age.

... It should be up to the parents.
Exactly. But, parents (for whatever reasons) are dropping the ball and forcing the schools to take over. This is totally wrong but it IS the fault of the parents.

MY PROBLEM IS THAT THESE ARE 2nd GRADERS
Ass Boil
CL,
It's ok.... just admit you have never read the story you are complaining about and you will probably regain some respect from everyone who has read your sad performance here......

LOL!!!
cunning lingo
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
CL,
It's ok.... just admit you have never read the story you are complaining about and you will probably regain some respect from everyone who has read your sad performance here......

LOL!!!


One, I've read the story..... Two - I could give a fuck if I have your respect. After your inability to hold conversation without giving any respect, I could cares less what you think, or who you are for that matter.
cunning lingo
Quote: Let me try to explain this as simply as possible.

I don't think 6 YEAR OLDS are ready for sex education.
I don't think 6 YEAR OLDS are ready to discuss gay / non-gay relationships.
Wrong. Their minds are like sponges at that age. Actually, it's a perfect age to teach them about sex IF they show curiosity about it at that age.

... It should be up to the parents.
Exactly. But, parents (for whatever reasons) are dropping the ball and forcing the schools to take over. This is totally wrong but it IS the fault of the parents.

MY PROBLEM IS THAT THESE ARE 2nd GRADERS


I disagree with you, but I appreciate your candor....
Ass Boil
CL,
If you have read the story, why are you unable to answer the simple questions you have been asked about it?

Is there sex in the story?

What specifically is in the story that you think these kids will not understand?

Stop projecting your stupidity and biggotry onto these 2nd graders.
Ass Boil
Oh, and I never said you need to earn MY respect. I just figured that after such an embarassing display as the one you have put on here, you might want to redeem yourself......

I guess not.

LOL
cunning lingo
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
CL,
If you have read the story, why are you unable to answer the simple questions you have been asked about it?

Is there sex in the story?

What specifically is in the story that you think these kids will not understand?

Stop projecting your stupidity and biggotry onto these 2nd graders.


Yes....ther are insane amounts of assfucking between two guys, i think a guy named assboil and some guy named andy.....

If your to stupid, or just don't care...just say so..It coulda saved a lot of time.
Stonewall
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
I am not gay, but I fail to see the harm the story would do to anyone hearing it. I am still waiting for you to explain what is in the story that should not be heard.

Keep in mind children are much more tolerant than the average hate-filled republican :p


You say you are not gay... will you also say, you have never been gay?

:)

Anyway, homosexual activity should be taught in no class in school unless it is taught as a mental illness.

I guess in ten years we will be teaching second graders that cannibalism is just another lifestyle...
ArivacaCharlie
Quote: Originally posted by Stonewall
You say you are not gay... will you also say, you have never been gay?

:)

Anyway, homosexual activity should be taught in no class in school unless it is taught as a mental illness.

I guess in ten years we will be teaching second graders that cannibalism is just another lifestyle...

Homosexuality a mental illness?!?
Stoney, I thought you had more on the ball than to say something that fuckin' stupid.
Ass Boil
Still no answers from you, CL?

why can't you answer such simple questions?
ArivacaCharlie
Quote: Originally posted by cunning lingo
If all religion is retarded to you , you must have a real issue with who to vote for. Every candidate running has a church affiliation. No athiests in the bunch there bub....good luck with that.

Most Christian teachings are anti-social and intolerant. If there IS a God, He would surely be pissed as hell about the way man has perverted His image of a loving, caring Father.
And, people who let their RELIGIOUS BELIEFS influence their ability to legislate have no business running for public office. They are completely unable to represent the diversity that is America.
Stonewall
Quote: Originally posted by ArivacaCharlie
Homosexuality a mental illness?!?
Stoney, I thought you had more on the ball than to say something that fuckin' stupid.



What would your description of it be?

Our brains are what make us think and behave in certain ways. Clearly homosexuality cannot be "normal" mentally. If that were the case humans would never have made it out of the jungles. We would not have been able to propagate. Is it not normal to create the next generation?
Ass Boil
Stumpedballs,
you are in no position to question the mental health of another human being. You should be housed in an inpatient facility where a team of doctors can study your profound paranoia and cowardice 24/7
Ass Boil
Stumpedballs,
there is scientific evidence that frogs have become homosexual naturally as a way of population control.
Stonewall
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
Stumpedballs,
you are in no position to question the mental health of another human being. You should be housed in an inpatient facility where a team of doctors can study your profound paranoia and cowardice 24/7



So, you are gay then?

Be careful or we'll have your ass Boil sent to Iran. They have a very interesting 'don't ask don't tell' policy... If it gets out you'll be discharged... or what they call it... a hanging.
ArivacaCharlie
Quote: Originally posted by Stonewall
What would your description of it be?

Our brains are what make us think and behave in certain ways. Clearly homosexuality cannot be "normal" mentally. If that were the case humans would never have made it out of the jungles. We would not have been able to propagate. Is it not normal to create the next generation?

C'mon, Stoney. Homosexuality is as normal as heterosexuality. Admittedly, there are a lot more straight people in the world than gay people, it doesn't mean gays are mentally ill.
That kind of thinking is as dangerously stupid as saying whites are smarter than blacks or men are better than women.
And your line about never making it "out of the jungles" because homosexual man could not propogate. Well, if ALL people were gay, that might be true (although, I know a few gay people who have given birth).
But, GAY is not an abnormality. GAY is, simply, a difference.
Stonewall
Quote: Originally posted by ArivacaCharlie
C'mon, Stoney. Homosexuality is as normal as heterosexuality. Admittedly, there are a lot more straight people in the world than gay people, it doesn't mean gays are mentally ill.
That kind of thinking is as dangerously stupid as saying whites are smarter than blacks or men are better than women.
And your line about never making it "out of the jungles" because homosexual man could not propogate. Well, if ALL people were gay, that might be true (although, I know a few gay people who have given birth).
But, GAY is not an abnormality. GAY is, simply, a difference.



In the grand scheme of things homosexuality is a minor thing. It's not something that needs to be dealt with, like schizophrenia does, but as we move along in our medical advances I'm sure the gene that creates schizophrenia will be dealt with and while they are there something tells me the minor mental illness of homosexuality will also be dealt with. It is an abnormality.
ArivacaCharlie
Quote: Originally posted by Stonewall
In the grand scheme of things homosexuality is a minor thing. It's not something that needs to be dealt with, like schizophrenia does, but as we move along in our medical advances I'm sure the gene that creates schizophrenia will be dealt with and while they are there something tells me the minor mental illness of homosexuality will also be dealt with. It is an abnormality.

Science thinks that it can tell if a fetus will, in fact, be gay once it is born. Knowing this, would you throw your right-wing ideals aside and abort this fetus?
Stonewall
Quote: Originally posted by ArivacaCharlie
Science thinks that it can tell if a fetus will, in fact, be gay once it is born. Knowing this, would you throw your right-wing ideals aside and abort this fetus?


No, I would not abort it.

What I was talking about was the future where if things progress in the direction generally accepted, the medical professionals will tinker with genetics in the womb. Is there any doubt in your mind that tinkering to remove the cause of homosexuality will not be done?

Of course it will be.
JTProcess
What's really sad is that a lot of idiots will hammer on this issue, and a lot of idiots will vote Republican and continue to get raped because of it.

Man you guys are easily duped... Americans are fucking retarded when it comes to sexual issues... it's a sad sad state of affairs.

This happened in massachussetts where gay marriage is legal... stay away from boston you dummies and you're kids can continue to live in the magical land of jesus rainbows and gumdrops... move to Alabama and your kids can be taught another type of "gay fairy tale" in school... it's called "creationism"
biker dave
fuck all that gay shit, i so sick and tyred of hearing about dick lickers....Get back in the closet :D
ArivacaCharlie
Quote: Originally posted by Stonewall
No, I would not abort it.

What I was talking about was the future where if things progress in the direction generally accepted, the medical professionals will tinker with genetics in the womb. Is there any doubt in your mind that tinkering to remove the cause of homosexuality will not be done?

Of course it will be.

Science to remove homosexuality, huh?
Well, according to the leader of Iran, they have (apparently) already accomplished that.
Homosexuality is NOT abnormal. It is simply DIFFERENT.
Why not science to remove blond hair......or people under 6 feet tall?
You're actually on the borderline of advocating getting rid of anyone who is not a straight, homophobic republican.
Ass Boil
The funny thing about stonedballs is that he is too dumb to realize his neanderthal idea that homosexualality is a mental disorder is MUCH closer to the leader of Iran's than anyone else's.

LOL.
curleydan
Quote: Originally posted by JTProcess

This happened in massachussetts where gay marriage is legal... stay away from boston you dummies and you're kids can continue to live in the magical land of jesus rainbows and gumdrops... move to Alabama and your kids can be taught another type of "gay fairy tale" in school... it's called "creationism"
this made me laugh.
Stonewall
Quote: Originally posted by JTProcess
What's really sad is that a lot of idiots will hammer on this issue, and a lot of idiots will vote Republican and continue to get raped because of it.

Man you guys are easily duped... Americans are fucking retarded when it comes to sexual issues... it's a sad sad state of affairs.

This happened in massachussetts where gay marriage is legal... stay away from boston you dummies and you're kids can continue to live in the magical land of jesus rainbows and gumdrops... move to Alabama and your kids can be taught another type of "gay fairy tale" in school... it's called "creationism"



I don't think one has to be "fucking retarded" to be against Gay Marriage. Before this decade there of course was no Gay Marriage.

The Left is in constant evolution when it comes to this society. Although I have failed to see even one good thing that has ever come from the Left. Not one. In fact only horrors be there.

The destruction of the family has been quite a project for the Left for at least 40 years now. They have succeeded in destroying the African-American families. Not quite satisfied with that they continue to assault the rest of American families. It does take a village and the Lefts Public Housing villages have been quite a success at raising a hellish generation of misfits. Misfits who then go on to fill the prisons. Then of course the Left complains of discrimination because their "village" has so many incarcerated.
curleydan
Quote: Originally posted by biker dave
fuck all that gay shit, i so sick and tyred of hearing about dick lickers....Get back in the closet :D
HELL YA!!!! bring on the naked chicks!!!
ArivacaCharlie
Quote: Originally posted by Ass Boil
The funny thing about stonedballs is that he is too dumb to realize his neanderthal idea that homosexualality is a mental disorder is MUCH closer to the leader of Iran's than anyone else's.

LOL.

It takes all kinds.
I've debated Stoney before. I know he's very right-wing. But, frankly, this view stopped me in my tracks. I really wasn't ready for something that backwoods to come from him.
My bad, I guess.
Ass Boil
Stumpy, maybe they wil discover the gene that causes one to become a braindead conservative like yourself and we can "fix" that so society won't be bothered with your kind of regressive ideas anymore?

One can only dream!
ArivacaCharlie
Quote: Originally posted by Stonewall
I don't think one has to be "fucking retarded" to be against Gay Marriage. Before this decade there of course was no Gay Marriage.

The Left is in constant evolution when it comes to this society. Although I have failed to see even one good thing that has ever come from the Left. Not one. In fact only horrors be there.

The destruction of the family has been quite a project for the Left for at least 40 years now. They have succeeded in destroying the African-American families. Not quite satisfied with that they continue to assault the rest of American families. It does take a village and the Lefts Public Housing villages have been quite a success at raising a hellish generation of misfits. Misfits who then go on to fill the prisons. Then of course the Left complains of discrimination because their "village" has so many incarcerated.

Before this decade, there was no i-phone, either. We can't continue to be ignorant simply because we've been ignorant for so long already.

Your Ad Here

Powered by: Search Engine Indexer and vBulletin v2.3.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2002, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
All code and concepts property of iMonkey Inc.

This website is not affiliated with the Howard Stern Show. It is produced by fans for fans.
We share no connection with Howard Stern, Sirius Radio, On Demand, CBS Broadcasting, E! TV or Infinity Broadcasting.

All posts and attachments are the responsibilities of their owners and not of this site.