SternFanNetwork
SFN Home SternFanNetwork Archive > Other Talk > Politics & News

Note: This is a Text only archive. Go directly to the real forum.

Loose Change Final Cut out 11/11 - Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics


banner

 
Loose Change Final Cut out 11/11 - Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
Stickman
Before commenting on LCFC, attaching kitty pics, etc, please watch the film. It will be available for free download on 11/11. A trailer is available here: loosechange911.com


Loose Change Final Cut will feature new and exclusive interviews with firefighters, EMT's, first responders and other officials who were all eyewitnesses to multiple secondary explosions in the twin towers and around the ground zero area .

Most notably, Housing Authority worker Barry Jennings speaks for the first time on camera about how he discovered the bomb damaged lobby of WTC Building 7 before either of the twin towers had even collapsed.

The release of Final Cut will no doubt be met with a fresh offensive of Neo-Con attack propaganda and attempted debunking, but with polls showing an increasing amount of people having grave concerns about the official 9/11 story, its arrival will herald a new leap forward for the 9/11 truth movement and signify the next step in educating the world about what really happened on September 11, 2001. http://prisonplanet.com/articles/oc...oose_change.htm
DUDE-HERE
building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7 building 7

enough
johnsonrod
Stickman,

Am I right to remember that Brent from Bubba's show was a truther at one point? If so, he doesn't talk about that stuff anymore. Do you know why or am I just remembering it wrong?

I thought he did a show on H100 about these topics once even.
Stickman
Quote: Originally posted by johnsonrod
Stickman,

Am I right to remember that Brent from Bubba's show was a truther at one point? If so, he doesn't talk about that stuff anymore. Do you know why or am I just remembering it wrong?

I thought he did a show on H100 about these topics once even.


You're right, he did.

I don't listen to the Bubba show much, so I don't know if he's brought it up. I met Brent when he came to Florida and thanked him for doing that show. It was the best hour of radio outside of Howard that I've heard from 100 or 101.

Oh, and what the fuck is a truther?
johnsonrod
I thought that is what at least some of you guys called yourselves, i.e. "9/11 scholars for truth".

I listen to Bubba every day. Brent shit-talks Bush and co. all the time. But no more conspiracy stuff. He hasn't renounced it or anything. I bet he was "spoken to" by the brass at Sirius.
Stickman
Quote: Originally posted by johnsonrod
I thought that is what at least some of you guys called yourselves, i.e. "9/11 scholars for truth".

I listen to Bubba every day. Brent shit-talks Bush and co. all the time. But no more conspiracy stuff. He hasn't renounced it or anything. I bet he was "spoken to" by the brass at Sirius.


I call myself someone who has read the 9/11 Commission Report, the NIST report, FEMA and any official analysis that I could get my hands on. I found it lacking.

I've also read the reports and analysis of a great deal more people who put the official story in grave doubt.

I don't know about a conspiracy to silence Brent, but I don't question his right to discretion. Anyone public who has the same basic doubts about the official story does not want to deal with inevitable shit storm that follows making such a controversial proclamation.
johnsonrod
I meant no disrespect by the term.

Also, if he was talked to about it I don't think it was because of a political conspiracy along those lines. Like I said, he constantly shit talks Bush.
jigzaw
Is Charlie Sheen narrating it?
Stickman
Quote: Originally posted by johnsonrod
I meant no disrespect by the term.

Also, if he was talked to about it I don't think it was because of a political conspiracy along those lines. Like I said, he constantly shit talks Bush.


None taken. Shit talking Bush is allowed in the current left dominated media. Criticizing the official story is not.

The left, as evidenced by the Bill Maher tirade, have more at stake in resisting the Inside Job theory.

IF 9/11 is an Inside Job then the administration is not made up a bunch of bumbling idiots, they are skillfully and deceptively incompetent.

That's a far scarier proposition for a liberal to wrap his brain around then the image of a moronic Bush. They neglect to see the cadres of resourceful geniuses behind the monkey.
Stickman
Quote: Originally posted by jigzaw
Is Charlie Sheen narrating it?


No.
VacateTheWord
Quote: Originally posted by Stickman
None taken. Shit talking Bush is allowed in the current left dominated media. Criticizing the official story is not.

The left, as evidenced by the Bill Maher tirade, have more at stake in resisting the Inside Job theory.

IF 9/11 is an Inside Job then the administration is not made up a bunch of bumbling idiots, they are skillfully and deceptively incompetent.

That's a far scarier proposition for a liberal to wrap his brain around then the image of a moronic Bush. They neglect to see the cadres of resourceful geniuses behind the monkey.


So Bill Maher turns a blind eye to the "Inside Job theory" becuase its in his best interests to maintain the President as a source for humor or he is afraid to confront the "truth."

Which one would you say is Maher's motivation?
Stickman
Quote: Originally posted by VacateTheWord
So Bill Maher turns a blind eye to the "Inside Job theory" becuase its in his best interests to maintain the President as a source for humor or he is afraid to confront the "truth."

Which one would you say is Maher's motivation?


Vacate you provide some of the most perfect examples of logical fallacies.

Today's example of a logical fallacy is false dilemma.

Not surprisingly you're taking a complex situation and simplifying it to only two options.
VacateTheWord
Quote: Originally posted by Stickman
Vacate you provide some of the most perfect examples of logical fallacies.

Today's example of a logical fallacy is false dilemma.

Not surprisingly you're taking a complex situation and simplifying it to only two options.


No, I'm going by what you were saying. You essentially said in the same post that if the Inside Job theory is accurate then Maher loses all of his "Bush is an idiot" jokes. You also claimed that the inside job theory is a "scarier proposition" than the mere "Bush is an idiot."

I was merely asking if you believe if Maher is afraid of the "truth" or is simply turning a blind eye to the evidence because he wants to keep his jokes.

What I do understand is that those who acted out in his audience are apparently accusing Maher of being in bed with the rest of the media that won't explore the Inside Job theory, yes? As you see in the video of the incident, a woman screams "what about building 7, Bill?" Obviously they are trying to get him to "face" (as you say) up to the facts as they see them and speak out.

All I was questioning was your take on Maher's motivation.
AcquiringSignal
Personally I think what happened was Bush & his guys wanted/needed/allowed 9/11 to happen so they had an excuse to get into the middle east & also to push their agenda.

I dont think they thought it would have been as big as it was. But clearly they allowed "it" to happen.

The Official Story is bullshit. But I dont think they had bombs ready to go off, they wouldnt need too, all they needed was "we were attacked on our soil - bullshit" So get everyone ready to believe their horseshit to get into the middle east. Again they allowed it to happen, but I dont think they knew what "it" was... Maybe a general idea, but I dont think they even thought 9/11 would have been as bad as it was.

so in turn they showed be nailed for all the lies and allowing it all to happen. If your going to play that game to start fake wars, you deserve to get exposed.
Stickman
Quote: Originally posted by VacateTheWord


All I was questioning was your take on Maher's motivation.


That's cool. I was simply suggesting that it doesn't just boil down to that.

I don't blame Maher for kicking out the rowdies from his audience. It's his show.

What makes Bill Maher a fucking douchebag coward was when interviewing Gary Kasparov he snidely said something like 'I could have used the KGB a few minutes ago.'

That's sickening. Kasparov represents exactly the opposite of the strong handed tactics employed by the KGB and Putin. This is still America. It's not against the law, nor should it be, to yell out whatever crazy thing you want.

I found his show funny and compelling at times, but he lost a lot of credibility with me for that bullshit.
Billyfromsphily
What do you expect from a comedian? He was trying to be funny using the KGB line, but you take a throw away line and make a festival out of its credibility? . Your loss and thats why you are a joke with all this bullshit!
Stickman
Quote: Originally posted by AcquiringSignal
Personally I think what happened was Bush & his guys wanted/needed/allowed 9/11 to happen so they had an excuse to get into the middle east & also to push their agenda.

I dont think they thought it would have been as big as it was. But clearly they allowed "it" to happen.

The Official Story is bullshit. But I dont think they had bombs ready to go off, they wouldnt need too, all they needed was "we were attacked on our soil - bullshit" So get everyone ready to believe their horseshit to get into the middle east. Again they allowed it to happen, but I dont think they knew what "it" was... Maybe a general idea, but I dont think they even thought 9/11 would have been as bad as it was.

so in turn they showed be nailed for all the lies and allowing it all to happen. If your going to play that game to start fake wars, you deserve to get exposed.


Fair enough. This is commonly referred to as LIHOP or letting it happen on purpose. Which in itself is a crime of conspiracy to fail to defend the US.

If that's what puts an end to the neo-con, military/industrial/congressional complex and restores a democracy to this country, you'll never hear a peep about controlled demolition from me.

It's like getting Al Capone on tax evasion.
Snoopyrules
Quote: Originally posted by Stickman
Fair enough. This is commonly referred to as LIHOP or letting it happen on purpose. Which in itself is a crime of conspiracy to fail to defend the US.

If that's what puts an end to the neo-con, military/industrial/congressional complex and restores a democracy to this country, you'll never hear a peep about controlled demolition from me.

It's like getting Al Capone on tax evasion.


So what you're saying is any conspiracy will do....good job.
Stickman
Quote: Originally posted by Snoopyrules
So what you're saying is any conspiracy will do....good job.


Conspiracy is a crime. If there is evidence, then yes, they should be prosecuted for failing to heed warnings and have taken the action necessary to prevent the attacks.

Your Ad Here

Powered by: Search Engine Indexer and vBulletin v2.3.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2002, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
All code and concepts property of iMonkey Inc.

This website is not affiliated with the Howard Stern Show. It is produced by fans for fans.
We share no connection with Howard Stern, Sirius Radio, On Demand, CBS Broadcasting, E! TV or Infinity Broadcasting.

All posts and attachments are the responsibilities of their owners and not of this site.