|
Note: This is a Text only archive. Go directly to the real forum.
P&N who is NewsGuy? I know he donates to stormfront forums but...
- Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
banner
| P&N who is NewsGuy? I know he donates to stormfront forums but...
- Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
|
| NewsGuy |
Wow, somebody really wants to suck my dick :rolleyes: |
|
|
| NC-Stern-Mark |
Quote: Originally posted by NewsGuy
Wow, somebody really wants to suck my dick :rolleyes: |
Its nice to be noticed, I guess... :dontknow: |
|
|
| Reverend Tyler |
| conservatives never seem to be able to see beyond race |
|
|
| NewsGuy |
Quote: Originally posted by Reverend Tyler
conservatives never seem to be able to see beyond race |
Neither do liberals, they just to blur and distort things to make conservatives out to be "bad" with ad hominem attacks like this cocksucker modeans is trying. Then they drown their guilt in hand-out programs like affirmative action and welfare. |
|
|
| Reverend Tyler |
| :rolleyes: |
|
|
| artechba |
Spending Friday nights on a shortwave radio station.
too easy..I'll let that one go |
|
|
| NewsGuy |
Quote: Originally posted by artechba
Spending Friday nights on a shortwave radio station.
too easy..I'll let that one go |
Internet, too:
www.therightperspective.com |
|
|
| ICE CUBAN |
:D
That was perfect comedic rapture. |
|
|
| ArivacaCharlie |
Quote: Originally posted by NewsGuy
Neither do liberals, they just to blur and distort things to make conservatives out to be "bad" with ad hominem attacks like this cocksucker modeans is trying. Then they drown their guilt in hand-out programs like affirmative action and welfare. |
Affirmative action was the result of the civil rights movement and was pretty much a knee-jerk reaction to rampant racism. In truth, it is one of the most discriminatory ideas in American politics.
However, to associate race with welfare and saying that Liberals drown their guilt in such programs is also a very racist sentiment.
Where will you and your pals be lighting a cross tonight? |
|
|
| Bronks Breasts |
| We should be pleased that Newsguy admits to being a mouth breather Here is to hoping that a black guy kills him so he can feel right about blaecks as he is dying. |
|
|
| artechba |
| that'll learn ya:) |
|
|
| mingmen |
Quote: Originally posted by NewsGuy
Neither do liberals, they just to blur and distort things to make conservatives out to be "bad" with ad hominem attacks like this cocksucker modeans is trying. Then they drown their guilt in hand-out programs like affirmative action and welfare. |
:lol: |
|
|
| modeams |
Quote: Originally posted by NewsGuy
Neither do liberals, they just to blur and distort things to make conservatives out to be "bad" with ad hominem attacks like this cocksucker modeans is trying. Then they drown their guilt in hand-out programs like affirmative action and welfare. |
same post, same reply
Reductio ad Hitlerum is perfectly acceptable dipshit, Ad hominem tu quoque was the fallacy of your original post :hw:
Do you think the 6 million jews were really exterminated. |
|
|
| lc317nv |
Quote: Originally posted by modeams
Reductio ad Hitlerum, Ad hominem tu quoque |
|
|
|
| booybob |
Quote: Originally posted by modeams
same post, same reply
Reductio ad Hitlerum is perfectly acceptable dipshit, Ad hominem tu quoque was the fallacy of your original post :hw:
Do you think the 6 million jews were really exterminated. |
No, the number from Aushwitz has been reduced .
4-million to1.1million |
|
|
| booybob |
Like most Americans, since his youth Cole had been instructed in the "irrefutable fact" that homicidal gassings had taken place at Auschwitz. The number of those so executed - also declared irrefutable—was 4.1 million.
Then came the Leuchter Report in 1988. This was followed by a "re-evaluation" of the total deaths at Auschwitz (down to 1.1 million). As a budding historian—and a Jew—Cole was intrigued.
Previous to 1992, anyone who publicly doubted the 4.1 million "gassing" deaths at Auschwitz was labeled an anti-Semite, neo-nazi skinhead (at the very least). Quietly, because of revisionist findings, the official figure was lowered to 1.1 million. No mention of that missing 3 million. |
|
|
| booybob |
However, on January 26, 1995, commemorating the 50th anniversary of the Auschwitz liberation, both The Washington Post and The New York Times itself reported that the Polish authorities had determined that, at most, 1.5 million people (of all races and religions)-not "4 million"-died at Auschwitz of all causes, including natural causes.
Yet this was not the first time this drastically reduced figure appeared in the major media. Almost five years previously, on July 17, 1990, The Washington Times reprinted a brief article from The London Daily Telegraph. That article stated:
Poland has cut its estimate of the number of people killed by the Nazis in the Auschwitz death camp from 4 million to just over 1 million . . . The new study could rekindle the controversy over the scale of Hitler's "final solution" . . .
Franciszek Piper, director of the historical committee of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum, said yesterday that, according to recent research, at least 1.3 million people were deported to the camp, of whom about 223,000 survived.
The 1.1 million victims included 960,000 Jews, between 70,000 and 75,000 Poles, nearly all of the 23,000 Gypsies sent to the camp and 15,000 Soviet prisoners of war.
Shmuel Krakowsky, head of research at Israel's Yad Vashem memorial for Jewish victims of the Holocaust, said the new Polish figures were correct: "The 4 million figure was let slip by Capt. Rudolf Hoess, the death camp's Nazi commander. Some have bought it, but it was exaggerated." . . . [P]laques commemorating the deaths of 4 million victims were removed from the Auschwitz museum earlier this month.
This detail of history was intriguing, since, after all, history books had said for a generation that of the 6 million Jews who died during the Holocaust, 4 million died at Auschwitz alone. Thus, if the new facts were correct, the actual overall number of Jewish Holocaust victims had to be considerably less than the much-talked-about figure of 6 million. Put simply: subtract the former 4 million Jews dead at Auschwitz from the popular 6 million, and that leaves 2 million Jews dead. Simple math-and a controversial conclusion indeed.
More recently, Walter Reich, former director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, jumped into the debate over Auschwitz. On September 8, 1998, The Washington Post published an article by Reich in which he addressed Jewish outrage over a group of elderly Polish nuns who wanted to place crosses in memory of Christians who died at Auschwitz. Reich was responding to what he described as a "well-meaning" August 31, 1998 editorial in The Post about the affair.
Reich commented that the editorial "illustrates how old fictions about Auschwitz have been accepted as facts-fictions that have been used repeatedly to distort the camp's history." Evidently, the Post had forgotten its own report on the Auschwitz numbers that it had published three years previously and chose, instead, to repeat "old fictions . . . accepted as facts." What, then, were those "old fictions . . . accepted as facts"? Here's what Reich had to say:
The Post identified Auschwitz-Birkenau as the death camp "where 3 million Jews and millions of others were murdered by the Nazis." Recent scholarship by a Polish historian has put the number of deaths there conservatively at about 1.1 million, with other estimates ranging to about 1.5 million. Approximately 90 percent of the dead were Jews. |
|
|
|
|
|
