What's the dead dune coon count? As long as it's more of them, that's what matters most.
3foot11midget
Quote: Originally posted by Il Gatto What's the dead dune coon count? As long as it's more of them, that's what matters most.
Uhhh...yea sure man,.....tell the thousands of families who have lost a family memeber dead that as long as we have killed more then the 'dune coon' then its all good
OsamerObamer
there is a world over population problem to consider
Xenon2006
fuck off liberal fuck
joedotnet
Don't forget about the tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians that have died and continue to do so at an alarming pace.
What a bunch of assholes. No wonder I avoid posting on this site so much. (Yeah, fuckholes, now you can tell me to avoid it more...so, fuck you in advance. You're still a bunch of complete faggot [especially you, 'Boots'] whiney douchebags). :mad:
43 Cent
Quote: Originally posted by JoeyBoots wrong forum cunt.
Quote: Originally posted by Sarcastro Vietnam Casualties = 58,209
WWII Casualties = 416,800
US Road Casualties, 2003-2008 = 212,665
Oh so that makes it ok huh. What about the 29,000 wounded with their lives ruined? Does that count in your
little black book of ignorance?
prof_frink
1
Winst
This is a silly thread...but if you're looking for counts.
How many people where in or around the targets on 9/11?
The WTC/lower Manhattan..the Pentagon..and a potential fourth target?
How many people where they trying to hurt/kill?...not to mention
the vast numbers of people effected by the attacks in all
of the various ways...worldwide.
...silly thread.
Psychedelic Bee
END THE DRAFT!!!
:rolleyes:
43 Cent
Quote: Originally posted by Winst This is a silly thread...but if you're looking for counts.
How many people where in or around the targets on 9/11?
The WTC..the Pentagon..and a potential fourth target?
How many people where they trying to hurt/kill?...not to mention
the vast numbers of people effected by the attacks in all
of the various ways...worldwide.
...silly thread.
Oh I forgot.. what did Iraq have to do with that again?
Winst
Quote: Originally posted by prof_frink You know middle eastern people aren't black you ignorant jackass.
He said dune coon...which is similar to sand nigger etc.
It's actually less about actual skin colors and more about the
colors of the cultures.
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by 43 Cent Oh I forgot.. what did Iraq have to do with that again?
Shhhhhhhhhhhhh.....thats the part they don't like talking about
Winst
Quote: Originally posted by 43 Cent Oh I forgot.. what did Iraq have to do with that again?
Less "Iraq"....and more Saddam...but under Saddam they were usually
considered to be the same thing.
Do you really need to know?.....you are unable to do your own research
on the subect?
...are your sources somewhat lacking?
Perhaps you should seek out some better sources.
Trying to avoid the *next* major attack on US interests was and remains
a pretty important goal.
....Saddam was doing what?....where?.......and why?
...and with who??
Oh wait...I know...I know....Saddam had **NO** WMDs...or no weaponizing programs....right?? :)
Winst
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson Shhhhhhhhhhhhh.....thats the part they don't like talking about
I have no problem talking about it.
The facts back up the operations.....despite what PR games are
played out on all sides....for whatever reasons.
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by Winst Less "Iraq"....and more Saddam...but under Saddam they were usually
considered to be the same thing.
Do you really need to know?.....you are unable to do your own research
on the subect?
...are your sources somewhat lacking?
Perhaps you should seek out some better sources.
Trying to avoid the *next* major attack on US interests was and remains
a pretty important goal.
....Saddam was doing what?....where?.......and why?
Oh wait...I know...I know....Saddam had **NO** WMDs...or no weaponizing programs....right?? :)
Care to post where the Uranium enrichment sites were at ? .....you know Bush said he wanted to avoid the mushroom cloud ......it takes aprox 98% enriched Uranium ???????
Brian Goodwin
Yeah just think, If that Fuckwad Clinton would have gotten Bin Laden when he had the chance ( he did let him go ) We wouldn't even be talking about this. GOD BLESS GEORGE BUSH.
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson Care to post where the Uranium enrichment sites were at ? .....you know Bush said he wanted to avoid the mushroom cloud ......it takes aprox 98% enriched Uranium ???????
then it takes the technology and the ability to build the " Bomb " :hw: ( which Iraq was no where near close to )
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by Brian Goodwin Yeah just think, If that Fuckwad Clinton would have gotten Bin Laden when he had the chance ( he did let him go ) We wouldn't even be talking about this. GOD BLESS GEORGE BUSH.
Two words ......Tora Bora ...Google it
Winst
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson Care to post where the Uranium enrichment sites were at ? .....you know Bush said he wanted to avoid the mushroom cloud ......it takes aprox 98% enriched Uranium ???????
Trust me.....if you are saying that..........you obviouly know very little
about some of Saddam's weapons development programs and
the associated denial and deception operations.
Saddam had no nuclear materials ready to rock?.......I'd be willing to take that
bet in a second.
This is open sourced stuff.....do your own research. :)
Winst
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson then it takes the technology and the ability to build the " Bomb " :hw: ( which Iraq was no where near close to )
Again you show me that you don't know what you are talking about.
....and BTW....concerning what you wrote/said......you are wrong...VERY
wrong related to Saddam's technological abilities to build a "bomb".
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson Two words ......Tora Bora ...Google it
The AQ network.......try to google that..and the goals in play. :)
Trip420
Quote: Originally posted by 43 Cent Oh I forgot.. what did Iraq have to do with that again?
A study commissioned by the Joint Forces Command in Norfolk, Virginia and produced by analysts at the Institute for Defense Analysis, a federally funded military think tank, entitled "Iraqi Perspectives Project: Saddam and Terrorism: Emerging Insights from Captured Iraqi Documents" says, among other things, "Because Saddam's security organizations and Osama bin Laden's terrorist network operated with similar aims (at least in the short term), considerable overlap was inevitable when monitoring, contracting, financing, and training the same outside groups. This created both the appearance of and, in some way, a 'de facto' link between the organizations. At times, these organizations would work together in pursuit of shared goals but still maintain their autonomy and independence because of innate caution and mutual distrust. Though the execution of Iraqi terror plots was not always successful, evidence shows that Saddam's use of terrorist groups remained strong up until the collapse of the regime." The report goes on to conclude that:
· In 1993, as Osama bin Laden's fighters battled Americans in Somalia, Saddam Hussein personally ordered the formation of an Iraqi terrorist group to join the battle there.
· For more than two decades, the Iraqi regime trained non-Iraqi jihadists in training camps throughout Iraq.
· According to a 1993 internal Iraqi intelligence memo, the regime was supporting a secret Islamic Palestinian organization dedicated to "armed jihad against the Americans and Western interests."
· In the 1990s, Iraq's military intelligence directorate trained and equipped "Sudanese fighters."
· In 1998, the Iraqi regime offered "financial and moral support" to a new group of jihadists in Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq.
· In 2002, the year before the war began, the Iraqi regime hosted in Iraq a series of 13 conferences for non-Iraqi jihadists groups.
· That same year a branch of the Iraqi Intelligence Service (IIS) issued hundreds of Iraqi passports for known terrorists.
There's more...1600 pages more...you just holler "'nuff" after you’ve decided to read what you don’t want to know
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by Winst Again you show me that you don't know what you are talking about.
....and BTW....concerning what you wrote/said......you are wrong...VERY
wrong related to Saddam's technological abilities to build a "bomb".
So Iraq was a nuclear power now....LOL .. yea OK
Il Gatto
Quote: Originally posted by 3foot11midget Uhhh...yea sure man,.....tell the thousands of families who have lost a family memeber dead that as long as we have killed more then the 'dune coon' then its all good
Like it or not, they won't stop when you have our volunteers leave.
Quote: Originally posted by OsamerObamer there is a world over population problem to consider
That pretty much sums up the core of the problem.
Winst
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson So Iraq was a nuclear power now....LOL .. yea OK
Well...rather simply put.....yes.
Exactly how do you want to go about defining the term "nuclear power"?
Saddam certainly had the ability/power to ruin someones day real quick.
....if "allowed" to do so etc.
43 Cent
Quote: Originally posted by Winst Again you show me that you don't know what you are talking about.
....and BTW....concerning what you wrote/said......you are wrong...VERY
wrong related to Saddam's technological abilities to build a "bomb".
North Korea, Pakistan, China, Russia. All years ahead of the 'possiblity' of having wmds. They already have
them. Saudi Arabia had none, yet the hijackers that destroyed the Towers were from... Saudi Arabia.
Syrian combatants blew up the USS Cole. Al Qaeda in Afghanistan commited multiple offenses against
US interests in Kenya, Tanzania, and other places around the globe in the late 90's.
Saddam "tried to kill my daddy" and "tried to take Kuwaits oil" and now our military and country is languishing
in a downward spiral. He was the least of our problems. Plus he hated Iran, now our biggest problem
ruffypup
First of all , it's NUCULUR,,,, hee hee he hee hee ;)
LovePregChicks
Quote: Originally posted by 43 Cent Oh I forgot.. what did Iraq have to do with that again?
So I take it by your logic we also shouldnt have fought the germans in World War 2 since they had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor?
nemo
Quote: Originally posted by Trip420 A study commissioned by the Joint Forces Command in Norfolk, Virginia and produced by analysts at the Institute for Defense Analysis, a federally funded military think tank, entitled "Iraqi Perspectives Project: Saddam and Terrorism: Emerging Insights from Captured Iraqi Documents" says, among other things, "Because Saddam's security organizations and Osama bin Laden's terrorist network operated with similar aims (at least in the short term), considerable overlap was inevitable when monitoring, contracting, financing, and training the same outside groups. This created both the appearance of and, in some way, a 'de facto' link between the organizations. At times, these organizations would work together in pursuit of shared goals but still maintain their autonomy and independence because of innate caution and mutual distrust. Though the execution of Iraqi terror plots was not always successful, evidence shows that Saddam's use of terrorist groups remained strong up until the collapse of the regime." The report goes on to conclude that:
· In 1993, as Osama bin Laden's fighters battled Americans in Somalia, Saddam Hussein personally ordered the formation of an Iraqi terrorist group to join the battle there.
· For more than two decades, the Iraqi regime trained non-Iraqi jihadists in training camps throughout Iraq.
· According to a 1993 internal Iraqi intelligence memo, the regime was supporting a secret Islamic Palestinian organization dedicated to "armed jihad against the Americans and Western interests."
· In the 1990s, Iraq's military intelligence directorate trained and equipped "Sudanese fighters."
· In 1998, the Iraqi regime offered "financial and moral support" to a new group of jihadists in Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq.
· In 2002, the year before the war began, the Iraqi regime hosted in Iraq a series of 13 conferences for non-Iraqi jihadists groups.
· That same year a branch of the Iraqi Intelligence Service (IIS) issued hundreds of Iraqi passports for known terrorists.
There's more...1600 pages more...you just holler "'nuff" after you’ve decided to read what you don’t want to know
and who could forget the "OIL for Food" scandal.
Saddam Hussein had purchased votes that would prevent the UN to sanction military action.
Pardoned by Clinton dude Marc Rich....ex-husband of Stern Show friend Denise Rich.... :rolleyes:
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by LovePregChicks So I take it by your logic we also shouldnt have fought the germans in World War 2 since they had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor?
Hitler declared war on us :hw:
Trip420
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson So Iraq was a nuclear power now....LOL .. yea OK
Think Libya, and we had no idea.... You're mentality is to wait until these rogue dictators have nukes, then act? That's smart...
And you can thank Israel for its 1983 airstrike on Saddams reactor, or he would have already has them when he went into Kuwait.
Wouldn't that have been nice?
Yeah, leave him alone, ignore him, and he'll go away. Go stick your head back in the sand. The doers and doing, and the whiners are whining. :o
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by Winst Well...rather simply put.....yes.
Exactly how do you want to go about defining the term "nuclear power"?
Saddam certainly had the ability/power to ruin someones day real quick.
....if "allowed" to do so etc.
Really ? and he didn't use these weapons on an invading army ( us ) why ?
Il Gatto
Quote: Originally posted by 43 Cent North Korea, Pakistan, China, Russia. All years ahead of the 'possiblity' of having wmds. They already have
them. Saudi Arabia had none, yet the hijackers that destroyed the Towers were from... Saudi Arabia.
Syrian combatants blew up the USS Cole. Al Qaeda in Afghanistan commited multiple offenses against
US interests in Kenya, Tanzania, and other places around the globe in the late 90's.
Saddam "tried to kill my daddy" and "tried to take Kuwaits oil" and now our military and country is languishing
in a downward spiral. He was the least of our problems. Plus he hated Iran, now our biggest problem
You're clouding it. The only attacks we've suffered, regardless of nationality of the combatants, were Al Qaeda, which isn't a nationality. And we all know Saddam was a great guy who we should've left in power to keep creating chaos in the Middle East. You want to tell us how great a guy he was now? LOL.
Trip420
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson Hitler declared war on us :hw:
Immediately after we declared war on Japan. How about Italy? They had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor..
Winst
Quote: Originally posted by 43 Cent North Korea, Pakistan, China, Russia. All years ahead of the 'possiblity' of having wmds. They already have
them. Saudi Arabia had none, yet the hijackers that destroyed the Towers were from... Saudi Arabia.
Syrian combatants blew up the USS Cole. Al Qaeda in Afghanistan commited multiple offenses against
US interests in Kenya, Tanzania, and other places around the globe in the late 90's.
Saddam "tried to kill my daddy" and "tried to take Kuwaits oil" and now our military and country is languishing
in a downward spiral. He was the least of our problems. Plus he hated Iran, now our biggest problem
I understand where your thinking is coming from....but are you even interested
in a response to what you wrote?....should I bother to take the time to reply?
I am sure that whatever I might say to try and point out a few facts to you
will most probably fall on deaf ears and/or simply be ignored.
Feel free to think whatever you want.....even if you are wrong. :)
Saddam was the *least* of our problems?
...it's kind of nice of you to at least step out on the ledge and somewhat
admit that Saddam was at the very least..a problem.
The Saddam problem has been somewhat solved.
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by Winst I understand where your thinking is coming from....but are you even interested
in a response to what you wrote?....should I bother to take the time to reply?
I am sure that whatever I might say to try and point out a few facts to you
will most probably fall on deaf ears and/or simply be ignored.
Feel free to think whatever you want.....even if you are wrong. :)
Saddam was the *least* of our problems?
...it's kind of nice of you to at least step out on the ledge and somewhat
admit that Saddam was at the very least..a problem.
The Saddam problem has been somewhat solved.
Burned down the barn ( our economy and dollar ) to kill a fly on a horses ass
Kilroy
this is a stupid argument...4000 killed in 5 years, many by accidents..the morons that try to compare the Iraq war with Vietnam need to have their asses kicked..seriously..
LovePregChicks
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson Hitler declared war on us :hw:
It doesnt matter that he declared war on us. Various muslim groups have declared war on us. If its not ok to attack muslim states because they had nothing to do with 9/11 the same logic should be applied to WW2
Winst
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson Really ? and he didn't use these weapons on an invading army ( us ) why ?
Again.......you display your ignorance on the topic.
Please learn up....do better research.
Just who was it that was in control of "Saddam's weapons"?
Saddam was crazy......but he wasn't crazy enough to deal with
that type of stuff on his own. He was certainly smart enough to
do such important things in the proper ways.
..and BTW...on the topic..it's well worth the mention to mention that
the US Special Forces are/were MUCH MUCH better than Saddam's people.
We lie...they die...welcome to the war.
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by LovePregChicks It doesnt matter that he declared war on us. Various muslim groups have declared war on us. If its not ok to attack muslim states because they had nothing to do with 9/11 the same logic should be applied to WW2
WW 2 had countries and fronts, AL-Quadea does not...they are an extremist group hiding in cells all over the planet
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by Winst Again.......you display your ignorance on the topic.
Please learn up....do better research.
Just who was it that was in control of "Saddam's weapons"?
Saddam was crazy......but he wasn't crazy enough to deal with
that type of stuff on his own. He was certainly smart enough to
do such important things in the proper ways.
..and BTW...on the topic..it's well worth the mention to mention that
the US Special Forces are/were MUCH MUCH better than Saddam's people.
We lie...they die...welcome to the war.
You didn't answer the question
JoeyBoots
Quote: Originally posted by Underwear Tree Wow.
What a bunch of assholes. No wonder I avoid posting on this site so much. (Yeah, fuckholes, now you can tell me to avoid it more...so, fuck you in advance. You're still a bunch of complete faggot [especially you, 'Boots'] whiney douchebags). :mad:
:lol:
and yet another obama supporter implodes.
vaga
Quote: Originally posted by 43 Cent Oh so that makes it ok huh. What about the 29,000 wounded with their lives ruined? Does that count in your
little black book of ignorance?
Do you remember the Seinfeld episode when George was trying to explain that the eclaire that he ate from the trash was "on top", and then, regardless of his protestation, Jerry made the declaration that "You are now a bum"?
43 Cent, "you are now a liberal". I'm sure you see yourself as a moderate, but you're not even close. Let me ask, are you from New York City or Washington State?
You keep count to serve your perverted agenda.
If your daughter was on one of the planes, would you have said a single word?
gj fuckface. ignore the facts: more military personnel died in 1986 when we weren't at war. and i wont even bring up the Carter years :pie:
bbrawler69
Thank god this country wasn't build by people like you. You've probably never fought for anything in your life.
43 Cent
Quote: Originally posted by JoeyBoots wrong forum cunt.
joedotnet
Quote: Originally posted by Sarcastro Vietnam Casualties = 58,209
WWII Casualties = 416,800
US Road Casualties, 2003-2008 = 212,665
Don't forget the 80,000 to 90,000 Iraqi civilians in that count. These are people that have been killed by some sort of violence since we've been in Iraq. These are the people we are supposedly protecting. Remember, we aren't at war with Iraqi civilians, it is al-Qaeda. But I guess that is okay, since they aren't Americans, right?
Winst
Quote: Originally posted by joedotnet Don't forget the 80,000 to 90,000 Iraqi civilians in that count. These are people that have been killed by some sort of violence since we've been in Iraq. These are the people we are supposedly protecting. Remember, we aren't at war with Iraqi civilians, it is al-Qaeda. But I guess that is okay, since they aren't Americans, right?
Can you please tell me how you define "Iraqi civilians".
Do you even understand how the Iraqis themselves define "Iraqi civilians"?
I don't think that you understand the bigger pictures currently being dealt
with in Iraq.
It seems to me that you have your set agenda in play.
...more power to ya....go for it...and good luck dealing with the good guys. :btu:
AttyJ
Quote: Originally posted by Winst Can you please tell me how you define "Iraqi civilians".
Do you even understand how the Iraqis themselves define "Iraqi civilians"?
***
the only thing that would make me care more about the definition of a [ dead ] Iraqi civilian would be if you qualified :ass2mouth
harley-davidson
Quote: Did Iraq contractor fleece American taxpayers?
Government report says flagship project was turned into a hall of horrors
Quote: WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Nearly $9 billion of money spent on Iraqi reconstruction is unaccounted for because of inefficiencies and bad management, according to a watchdog report published Sunday.
Quote: Originally posted by AttyJ the only thing that would make me care more about the definition of a [ dead ] Iraqi civilian would be if you qualified :ass2mouth
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson Burned down the barn ( our economy and dollar ) to kill a fly on a horses ass
Another apologist. So, let's build a big old wall around our shores and fuck everyone outside the USA.
Sadam's got (had) a special court that cuts off people's hands, sucks to be you (NRP last week).
Your dad was on the 79th floor in tower Iand suffered the horror of being ripped to pieces, weeping to God and his children, fuck him.
Someday, you'll experience loss that will knock your head clear. You will feel the shame of your words.
AttyJ
Quote: Originally posted by Jack Shit :lol:
retards... :suicide:
Jack Shit
Quote: Originally posted by Winst Can you please tell me how you define "Iraqi civilians".
Do you even understand how the Iraqis themselves define "Iraqi civilians"?
I don't think that you understand the bigger pictures currently being dealt
with in Iraq.
It seems to me that you have your set agenda in play.
...more power to ya....go for it...and good luck dealing with the good guys. :btu:
I believe this is an Iraqi civilian. Although your post is causing me to question whether I may be mistaken.
Jack Shit
.
Here's another freedom hating Iraqi non-civilian.
Jack Shit
Quote: Originally posted by vaga Another apologist. So, let's build a big old wall around our shores and fuck everyone outside the USA.
Sadam's got (had) a special court that cuts off people's hands, sucks to be you (NRP last week).
Your dad was on the 79th floor in tower Iand suffered the horror of being ripped to pieces, weeping to God and his children, fuck him.
Someday, you'll experience loss that will knock your head clear. You will feel the shame of your words.
Newsflash: Iraq has -0- to do with 9-11.
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by vaga Another apologist. So, let's build a big old wall around our shores and fuck everyone outside the USA.
Sadam's got (had) a special court that cuts off people's hands, sucks to be you (NRP last week).
Your dad was on the 79th floor in tower Iand suffered the horror of being ripped to pieces, weeping to God and his children, fuck him.
Someday, you'll experience loss that will knock your head clear. You will feel the shame of your words.
1) Iraq had nothing to do with 911
2) Look at the human rights violations of China...our new bank and the manufacture of our goods :jj: ....( they kill 70,000 prisoners year for organ donations )
for violations as simple as theft
Jack Shit
Quote: Originally posted by Sarcastro Vietnam Casualties = 58,209
WWII Casualties = 416,800
US Road Casualties, 2003-2008 = 212,665
harley-davidson
Another Iraq non-civilian
43 Cent
one of the more shocking videos i've seen. General Wesley Clark ring a bell?
Cream_of_Jebus
Our death count would have been close to 0 if liberals didn't push for minimal Iraqi deaths. Instead of blowing the crap out of them from the air like we could have, we have to go door-to-door.
Being "sensitive" = exposing our soldiers
43 Cent
Quote: Originally posted by Cream_of_Jebus Our death count would have been close to 0 if liberals didn't push for minimal Iraqi deaths. Instead of blowing the crap out of them from the air like we could have, we have to go door-to-door.
Being "sensitive" = exposing our soldiers
Oh you mean like the 32 billion dollar shock and awe campaign that preceded the invasion? The one that didn't work?
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by Cream_of_Jebus Our death count would have been close to 0 if liberals didn't push for minimal Iraqi deaths. Instead of blowing the crap out of them from the air like we could have, we have to go door-to-door.
Being "sensitive" = exposing our soldiers
Another stupid fucking Republican trying to re-write history facts and actual events ... :rolleyes:
Jack Shit
Quote: Originally posted by Cream_of_Jebus Our death count would have been close to 0 if liberals didn't push for minimal Iraqi deaths. Instead of blowing the crap out of them from the air like we could have, we have to go door-to-door.
Being "sensitive" = exposing our soldiers
Yes, in order to free them from the tyrant Saddem Hussein, we must kill them.
Jack Shit
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson Another Iraq non-civilian
He's going to have a hard time riding that bicycle. It looks like the wheels may have been bent.
KING SHIT
How come nobody ever mentions that Saddam Hussein's regime killed 250,000 to 290,000 people?
WE put a stop to that. :D
andy08502
ah good point, john mccain has 2 songs in iraq right now, so vote for mccain if you want the war handled right dickwad
Wookin Pa Nub
Quote: Originally posted by KING SHIT How come nobody ever mentions that Saddam Hussein's regime killed 250,000 to 290,000 people?
WE put a stop to that. :D
or how we added to that.
mingmen
Quote: Originally posted by Winst This is a silly thread...but if you're looking for counts.
How many people where in or around the targets on 9/11?
The WTC/lower Manhattan..the Pentagon..and a potential fourth target?
How many people where they trying to hurt/kill?...not to mention
the vast numbers of people effected by the attacks in all
of the various ways...worldwide.
...silly thread.
really :yes:
iraq has nothing to do with 9/11 :no:
events888
Quote: Originally posted by 43 Cent one of the more shocking videos i've seen. General Wesley Clark ring a bell?
General Wesley Clark certainly does ring a bell. Especially the (Ret.) after his name.
Bad generals are no longer fired. That embarrasses too many officers who approved his rank and remember that Congress must also approve all General Officers - it literally takes an act of Congress to commission a mere 2nd Lieutenant.
No, they aren't fired they are retired. Forcibly, but quietly.
Quote: "Clark is smart," concludes one who has monitored his career. "But his whole life has been spent manipulating appearances (e.g. the doctored OPFOR exercise) in the interests of his career. Now he is faced with a reality he can't control." This observer concludes that, confronted with the wily Slobodan and other unavoidable variables of war, Clark will soon come unglued.
This prediction was no fantasy - it was virtually a prophecy.
Do try not to be so ill-informed, poster 43 Cent. It makes you appear stupid.
Bronx
I'm sure the children were killed or maimed by big bad American killers. Not by coward suicide bombers.
Remember this?
No WMD used here huh.......
T@H
Fantastic documentary about how the US inadvertently (maybe?) started the entire insurgency...and how much money this is costing....one interesting fact that comes out in this is that when the troops secured Baghdad the only building they guarded was the Ministry of Oil.
This website is not affiliated with the Howard Stern Show. It is produced by fans for fans. We share no connection with Howard Stern, Sirius Radio, On Demand, CBS Broadcasting, E! TV or Infinity Broadcasting.
All posts and attachments are the responsibilities of their owners and not of this site.
