SternFanNetwork
SFN Home SternFanNetwork Archive > Other Talk > Politics & News

Note: This is a Text only archive. Go directly to the real forum.

McCain Chief Advisor - Terrorist Attack on US "certainly a big advantage" for McCain - Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics


banner

 
McCain Chief Advisor - Terrorist Attack on US "certainly a big advantage" for McCain - Click HERE to go to the original thread with graphics
Reverend Tyler
Is this what they are hoping for?


From Fortune Magazine:

http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/20/mag...itford.fortune/


On national security McCain wins. We saw how that might play out early in the campaign, when one good scare, one timely reminder of the chaos lurking in the world, probably saved McCain in New Hampshire, a state he had to win to save his candidacy - this according to McCain's chief strategist, Charlie Black. The assassination of Benazir Bhutto in December was an "unfortunate event," says Black. "But his knowledge and ability to talk about it reemphasized that this is the guy who's ready to be Commander-in-Chief. And it helped us." As would, Black concedes with startling candor after we raise the issue, another terrorist attack on U.S. soil. "Certainly it would be a big advantage to him," says Black.




Fucking disgraceful
its-just-a-ride
All commentators have been saying for some time now the only way Obama will lose is if there is a "major world event" (i.e. terrorist attack).

I wouldn't say Reps are hoping for it (unless there are genuine traitors in their party) but if it were to occur they would use it the same way they used 9/11 to topple Saddam and invade Iraq... fear and manipulation.
jetdog
All the more reason to vote for Senator Obama. McCain is a pathetic liar with a campaign run by the lowest of DC lobbyists.
WillowGlen
I dont see it helping him. It would just point out that once again that the Rep adminstration has done nothing to make us safer.
jetdog
McCain "disavowed" Blacks bullshit today, and spewed more nonsense about how he is Mr US Safety, blah, blah, fucking blah. A collection of fucking idiots.
fastfingersfunk
Quote: Originally posted by WillowGlen
I dont see it helping him. It would just point out that once again that the Rep adminstration has done nothing to make us safer.



what did the dem adminstration do about khalid sheik mohammed and the people hiding in afghanistan after WTC 93 to make us safer? i would like to point out, the mastermind and one of financiers of these attacks is in prison directly from the result of the rep administration.

i hate taking the side of rep or dem because i don't follow one or the others beliefs down a line, but lets be real here.
NoName
Another terrorist attack under Bush and McCain's chief adviser thinks it will HELP McCain?? Where do they get their pot from?
NoName
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
what did the dem adminstration do about khalid sheik mohammed and the people hiding in afghanistan after WTC 93 to make us safer? i would like to point out, the mastermind and one of financiers of these attacks is in prison directly from the result of the rep administration.

i hate taking the side of rep or dem because i am don't follow one or the others beliefs down a line, but lets be real here.
Blah, Blah, Blah, Obama, Blah, Blah, Bush, Iraq, Blah, Blah
fastfingersfunk
Quote: Originally posted by NoName
Blah, Blah, Blah, Obama, Blah, Blah, Bush, Iraq, Blah, Blah



i expect nothing more from you than that lol. when the truth hurts, ignore it.
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
i expect nothing more from you than that lol. when the truth hurts, ignore it.


Mr 63 kills speaks truth.....lol....2 pounds of dog shit is worth more that anything out of your cocksucker
Rafterman
Quote: Originally posted by jetdog
All the more reason to vote for Senator Obama. McCain is a pathetic liar with a campaign run by the lowest of DC lobbyists.


Exactly

More Rovian BULLSHIT.
Rafterman
Quote: Originally posted by NoName
Blah, Blah, Blah, Obama, Blah, Blah, Bush, Iraq, Blah, Blah


:bigup:

That's all they have, and it ain't much.
fastfingersfunk
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson
Mr 63 kills speaks truth.....lol....2 pounds of dog shit is worth more that anything out of your cocksucker



lmao. so i guess you have nothing to offer over the fact that this administration was responsible for catching khalid sheik mohammed and not the administration he first attacked us under? another kook with nothing to say.
fastfingersfunk
Quote: Originally posted by Rafterman
:bigup:

That's all they have, and it ain't much.


lmao. so i guess you have nothing to offer over the fact that this administration was responsible for catching khalid sheik mohammed and not the administration he first attacked us under? another kook with nothing to say.
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
lmao. so i guess you have nothing to offer over the fact that this administration was responsible for catching khalid sheik mohammed and not the administration he first attacked us under? another kook with nothing to say.



Where was he from ? this 1 guy that could destroy our universe ?

harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson
Where was he from ? this 1 guy that could destroy our universe ?


Let me help..................> Iraq where ?





Quote: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was a member of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda organization, although he lived in Kuwait rather than Afghanista



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_Shaikh_Mohammed


MORON
fastfingersfunk
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson
Let me help..................> Iraq where ?








http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_Shaikh_Mohammed


MORON



what is your point? this has nothing to do with where he is from, it has to do with the fact that this administration caught the person responsible for many terror attacks, the biggest on US soil. i was replying to willow saying that "rep have done noting to make us safer", and that they most certainly have done more than the dems, including catch the person that attacked the US under dem administration.

and btw, are you trying to say he has always been in kuwait? don't forget he fought in afghanistan against russia (see your own link) and he was found in pakistan. not sure what you are trying to say there.
jetdog
Ah yes, the lobbyist Charlie Black who worked for dictators Ferdinand Markos, Mobuto Sese Seko, rebel leader Jonas Savimbi and was directly linked to lobbying for an Iran based firm, now wishing for the deaths of Americans to further his goals of, well, working for more dictators. Thats todays GOP, the death of Americans is always on their sick fuck minds.
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
what is your point? this has nothing to do with where he is from, it has to do with the fact that this administration caught the person responsible for many terror attacks, the biggest on US soil. i was replying to willow saying that "rep have done noting to make us safer", and that they most certainly have done more than the dems, including catch the person that attacked the US under dem administration.

and btw, are you trying to say he has always been in kuwait? don't forget he fought in afghanistan against russia and he was found in pakistan. not sure what you are trying to say there.




You're a fucking idiot that proves it with ever post and I'm not wasting my fucking time explaining to to you ...maybe you could post and attack on the U S by Iraq to justify the war you support and never fought in MR 63 kills
im_highonhash
Quote: Originally posted by its-just-a-ride
All commentators have been saying for some time now the only way Obama will lose is if there is a "major world event" (i.e. terrorist attack).

I wouldn't say Reps are hoping for it (unless there are genuine traitors in their party) but if it were to occur they would use it the same way they used 9/11 to topple Saddam and invade Iraq... fear and manipulation.
what the fuck did bush do to help the us after 9/11? he fucked up everything he attempted, afghanistan, iraq, katrina, you name it, bush fucked it up. AMERICA, HOME OF THE FUCKING RETARDED.
im_highonhash
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
what is your point? this has nothing to do with where he is from, it has to do with the fact that this administration caught the person responsible for many terror attacks, the biggest on US soil. i was replying to willow saying that "rep have done noting to make us safer", and that they most certainly have done more than the dems, including catch the person that attacked the US under dem administration.

and btw, are you trying to say he has always been in kuwait? don't forget he fought in afghanistan against russia (see your own link) and he was found in pakistan. not sure what you are trying to say there.
we caught osama bin ladin? no, didn't think so. we caught the person bush wanted to scape goat for 9/11, and FUCKING idiots like you bought it, hook,line and sinker.
Fdubya247
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson
Where was he from ? this 1 guy that could destroy our universe ?



fastfingersfunk
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson
You're a fucking idiot that proves it with ever post and I'm not wasting my fucking time explaining to to you ...maybe you could post and attack on the U S by Iraq to justify the war you support and never fought in MR 63 kills



so you didn't have a point? lmao, that's what i thought.
fastfingersfunk
Quote: Originally posted by im_highonhash
we caught osama bin ladin? no, didn't think so. we caught the person bush wanted to scape goat for 9/11, and FUCKING idiots like you bought it, hook,line and sinker.


you are right, khalid mohammed is 100% innocent. even when clinton's administration was looking for him. LMFAO.


im_highonhash
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
so you didn't have a point? lmao, that's what i thought.
please, go to iraq and die.
Fdubya247
Quote: Originally posted by im_highonhash
please, go to iraq and die.


:pray:
fastfingersfunk
Quote: Originally posted by im_highonhash
please, go to iraq and die.



and i didn't say they caught binladen (although i believe he's dead). i'm stating facts about what the reps have done to catch the people responsible for attacks on the US vs. what the dem administration did.

in order to debate what i'm talking about, you would have to tell me what the dem admin accomplished against these terror groups, go ahead, let's hear it.
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
so you didn't have a point? lmao, that's what i thought.



You're to fucking stupid to know when a points been made ...you are one stupid motherfucker
im_highonhash
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
you are right, khalid mohammed is 100% innocent. even when clinton's administration was looking for him. LMFAO.
im not a democrat either moron, I think the entire governemtn fucked this one up, big time. Either way, no matter how you slice it, people are dying over there for wrong reasons. you can keep up your love affair with bush, cheney and the rest of those retards, you're the one who looks like a complete moron every day of your life, because you are too stupid to see what is really going on.
zimmie
another attack before the election would help get McCain elected...deep down, Americans know Nobama is weak....
fastfingersfunk
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson
You're to fucking stupid to know when a points been made ...you are one stupid motherfucker


stupid is not being able to understand the original topic. great, khalid mohammed is from afghanistan and not iraq. that doesn't negate the fact that we caught him and he can no longer plan attack on us.
Fdubya247
Quote: Originally posted by zimmietard
...deep down, Americans know Nobama is weak....


....projection is the hallmark of an un-evolved mind.


zimmietard
Irrelevant Member

Eating-Shit
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
and i didn't say they caught binladen (although i believe he's dead). i'm stating facts about what the reps have done to catch the people responsible for attacks on the US vs. what the dem administration did.

in order to debate what i'm talking about, you would have to tell me what the dem admin accomplished against these terror groups, go ahead, let's hear it.



911 happened on Bush's watch because he did " NOTHING " from January to September ...he was on fucking " VACATION " and ignored everything ....
fastfingersfunk
Quote: Originally posted by im_highonhash
im not a democrat either moron, I think the entire governemtn fucked this one up, big time. Either way, no matter how you slice it, people are dying over there for wrong reasons. you can keep up your love affair with bush, cheney and the rest of those retards, you're the one who looks like a complete moron every day of your life, because you are too stupid to see what is really going on.


i never said you were a democrat. maybe you should go back and actually understand the debate so you don't get confused.
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by zimmie
another attack before the election would help get McCain elected...deep down, Americans know Nobama is weak....


and we're so much stronger with a 10 trillion debt at war with a country that never attacked us :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
i never said you were a democrat. maybe you should go back and actually understand the debate so you don't get confused.



Tell us again about your delusion serving in Iraq with 63 kills
fastfingersfunk
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson
911 happened on Bush's watch because he did " NOTHING " from January to September ...he was on fucking " VACATION " and ignored everything ....


lmao. i guess you just can't stay on topic ever.

anyway, you are right, bush should have been at dulles airport screening passengers and figured out what mohammed atta was up too. just as clinton should have been at u-haul to stop ramsey usef from from bombing the WTC in 93. my point is though, that this admin caught one of the main figures of al-qaeda (khalid) and many others, but the previous admin did NOTHING outside of the US.
zimmie
Quote: Originally posted by harley-davidson
and we're so much stronger with a 10 trillion debt at war with a country that never attacked us :rolleyes: :rolleyes:


and Obama's planning bigger government and an expanded war in Afghanistan........you see much difference?
mingmen
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
but the previous admin did NOTHING outside of the US.


that could be considered a good thing :rolleyes:
mingmen
Quote: Originally posted by zimmie
and Obama's planning bigger government and an expanded war in Afghanistan........you see much difference?


yeah, harley - don't you know this is about permanent iraq bases and not any genuine concern about terror ;)
harley-davidson
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
lmao. i guess you just can't stay on topic ever.

anyway, you are right, bush should have been at dulles airport screening passengers and figured out what mohammed atta was up too. just as clinton should have been at u-haul to stop ramsey usef from from bombing the WTC in 93. my point is though, that this admin caught one of the main figures of al-qaeda (khalid) and many others, but the previous admin did NOTHING outside of the US.



And this diatribe has ....well not one fucking thing to do with Iraq ...thanks for playing ass wipe :hw:
fastfingersfunk
Quote: Originally posted by mingmen
that could be considered a good thing :rolleyes:


yeah it's a good thing that clinton didn't go to afghanistan although they knew these people were there (they just sent a couple of cruise missiles into an empty training camp). instead, let them hang out and plot 9/11. GOOD THING??? LMFAO. wow.
JUST1COMMENT
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk


i hate taking the side of rep or dem because i don't follow one or the others beliefs down a line, but lets be real here.


Yes, let's get real, shall we? L-i-s-t-e-n to the MINDSET of the current GOP. They see death and destruction on our soil as an ADVANTAGE to them. They actually hope we get attacked because power is more important to them than safety. You're not even attempting to address the actual topic.

LISTEN TO THE MINDSET. They want this nation to be further crippled solely because they want to hold onto power.
Rafterman
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
lmao. so i guess you have nothing to offer over the fact that this administration was responsible for catching khalid sheik mohammed and not the administration he first attacked us under? another kook with nothing to say.


Where is the man responsible for 911?

Oh yeah, he's making videos.

BTW, the men who perpetrated the first TC bombings are still behind bars.
Rafterman
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
yeah it's a good thing that clinton didn't go to afghanistan although they knew these people were there (they just sent a couple of cruise missiles into an empty training camp). instead, let them hang out and plot 9/11. GOOD THING??? LMFAO. wow.


And the Bush administration totally ignored the FBI intell that a plot was underway involving commercial jets. Bush's response to the reports, a month long vacation in Crawford TX.

One would be lead to believe that this administration wanted the plot to succeed.

Crawl back under your rock at anytime, shit for brains.
Billyfromsphily
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
yeah it's a good thing that clinton didn't go to afghanistan although they knew these people were there (they just sent a couple of cruise missiles into an empty training camp). instead, let them hang out and plot 9/11. GOOD THING??? LMFAO. wow.


I guess you fporget that the REPUBLICAN MAJORITY cryed wag the dog when Clinton wanted to pursue Osama. Business was more important then than terror.

Thats too easy we should have sent you and now you would have 64 Kills.
Reverend Tyler
Charlie Black should be fired
VacateTheWord
Quote: Originally posted by Reverend Tyler
Charlie Black should be fired


For what, exactly?

He didn't say that he was hoping for another terror attack. He was echoing what many pundits have said many times - that if, God forbid, we were attacked again on US soil that that event would benefit the Republican candidate because Obama is weak on terror. He has apologized for the remark, as has John McCain.
Did Michelle Obama ever apologize for calling America in 2008 a "downright mean country" yet?
Rush Has AIDS
Quote: Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
what did the dem adminstration do about khalid sheik mohammed and the people hiding in afghanistan after WTC 93 to make us safer? i would like to point out, the mastermind and one of financiers of these attacks is in prison directly from the result of the rep administration.

i hate taking the side of rep or dem because i don't follow one or the others beliefs down a line, but lets be real here.



How convenient to mention Khalid Sheik Mohammed, who had little to do with 1993.

Yet you don't mention that people actually involved with the bombing, like Ramzi Yousef, were caught, tried & convicted, and are serving life in prison in a Supermax prison in Colorado.

Interesting....
Rafterman
Quote: Originally posted by Billyfromsphily
I guess you fporget that the REPUBLICAN MAJORITY cryed wag the dog when Clinton wanted to pursue Osama. Business was more important then than terror.

Thats too easy we should have sent you and now you would have 64 Kills.


:bigup:

Fuckin' A they did.
Fdubya247
Quote: Originally posted by Billyfromsphily
I guess you fporget that the REPUBLICAN MAJORITY cryed wag the dog when Clinton wanted to pursue Osama. Business was more important then than terror.



The GOP hates America.


(for real)
Fdubya247
Quote: Originally posted by Rush Has AIDS
How convenient to mention Khalid Sheik Mohammed, who had little to do with 1993.

Yet you don't mention that people actually involved with the bombing, like Ramzi Yousef, were caught, tried & convicted, and are serving life in prison in a Supermax prison in Colorado.

Interesting....


:burst:
Fdubya247
Quote: Originally posted by VacateTheWord
Did Michelle Obama ever apologize for calling America in 2008 a "downright mean country" yet?


....god damn you reich-wingers are the biggest pussies the planet has ever known.


Living cunts.


:shake:
Reverend Tyler
Quote: Originally posted by VacateTheWord
For what, exactly?

He didn't say that he was hoping for another terror attack. He was echoing what many pundits have said many times - that if, God forbid, we were attacked again on US soil that that event would benefit the Republican candidate because Obama is weak on terror. He has apologized for the remark, as has John McCain.
Did Michelle Obama ever apologize for calling America in 2008 a "downright mean country" yet?


For easily minimizing a potential tragic attack on US Soil in discussing how it will benefit him politically. It's disgusting.
VacateTheWord
Quote: Originally posted by Reverend Tyler
For easily minimizing a potential tragic attack on US Soil in discussing how it will benefit him politically. It's disgusting.


Charlie Black was not "minimizing a potential attack" - he was asked a political question.

You really want to take issue with that and look the other way at the countless amounts of times that the Democrats (including Obama) have either downplayed or outright ignored all of the success that has been brought by General Petraeus over the past year and a half - all for their own political benefit?
VacateTheWord
Quote: Originally posted by Fdubya247
....god damn you reich-wingers are the biggest pussies the planet has ever known.


Living cunts.


:shake:


Yeah, it sucks when you can't explain away comments like that, doesn't it?
Reverend Tyler
Quote: Originally posted by VacateTheWord
Charlie Black was not "minimizing a potential attack" - he was asked a political question.

You really want to take issue with that and look the other way at the countless amounts of times that the Democrats (including Obama) have either downplayed or outright ignored all of the success that has been brought by General Petraeus over the past year and a half - all for their own political benefit?

he minimized in in thathe ansered it in purely a political context. I we get attacked its 1 percentage point for every 1000 victims! Make it count AQ!

Quit trying to deflect. Black is also a lobbyist for disgusting dictators who murder indiscriminitely as well...It seems he is perfectly at home at the very top of the McCain campaign
Fdubya247
Quote: Originally posted by VacateTheWord
Yeah, it sucks when you can't explain away comments like that, doesn't it?


Douche-chills X 100,000,000,000.99
Fdubya247
Quote: Originally posted by VacateTheWord
all of the success that has been brought by General Petraeus over the past year and a half - all for their own political benefit?


Yeah, the Iraqi Government is being infiltrated by Sadrists....!!!

Success!!!





SaintJimmy
Quote: Originally posted by JUST1COMMENT
Yes, let's get real, shall we? L-i-s-t-e-n to the MINDSET of the current GOP. They see death and destruction on our soil as an ADVANTAGE to them. They actually hope we get attacked because power is more important to them than safety. You're not even attempting to address the actual topic.

LISTEN TO THE MINDSET. They want this nation to be further crippled solely because they want to hold onto power.







Yes, let's get real, shall we? L-i-s-t-e-n to the MINDSET of the current GOP. They see death and destruction on our soil as an ADVANTAGE to them. They actually hope we get attacked because power is more important to them than safety. You're not even attempting to address the actual topic.

LISTEN TO THE MINDSET. They want this nation to be further crippled solely because they want to hold onto power.







Yes, let's get real, shall we? L-i-s-t-e-n to the MINDSET of the current GOP. They see death and destruction on our soil as an ADVANTAGE to them. They actually hope we get attacked because power is more important to them than safety. You're not even attempting to address the actual topic.

LISTEN TO THE MINDSET. They want this nation to be further crippled solely because they want to hold onto power.








Yes, let's get real, shall we? L-i-s-t-e-n to the MINDSET of the current GOP. They see death and destruction on our soil as an ADVANTAGE to them. They actually hope we get attacked because power is more important to them than safety. You're not even attempting to address the actual topic.

LISTEN TO THE MINDSET. They want this nation to be further crippled solely because they want to hold onto power.




Yes, let's get real, shall we? L-i-s-t-e-n to the MINDSET of the current GOP. They see death and destruction on our soil as an ADVANTAGE to them. They actually hope we get attacked because power is more important to them than safety. You're not even attempting to address the actual topic.

LISTEN TO THE MINDSET. They want this nation to be further crippled solely because they want to hold onto power.



Quoted for truth.

Repeated because it needs to be.

Over and over and over again.
Reverend Tyler
definitely very true
Rafterman
Quote: Originally posted by SaintJimmy
Yes, let's get real, shall we? L-i-s-t-e-n to the MINDSET of the current GOP. They see death and destruction on our soil as an ADVANTAGE to them. They actually hope we get attacked because power is more important to them than safety. You're not even attempting to address the actual topic.

LISTEN TO THE MINDSET. They want this nation to be further crippled solely because they want to hold onto power.







Yes, let's get real, shall we? L-i-s-t-e-n to the MINDSET of the current GOP. They see death and destruction on our soil as an ADVANTAGE to them. They actually hope we get attacked because power is more important to them than safety. You're not even attempting to address the actual topic.

LISTEN TO THE MINDSET. They want this nation to be further crippled solely because they want to hold onto power.








Yes, let's get real, shall we? L-i-s-t-e-n to the MINDSET of the current GOP. They see death and destruction on our soil as an ADVANTAGE to them. They actually hope we get attacked because power is more important to them than safety. You're not even attempting to address the actual topic.

LISTEN TO THE MINDSET. They want this nation to be further crippled solely because they want to hold onto power.




Yes, let's get real, shall we? L-i-s-t-e-n to the MINDSET of the current GOP. They see death and destruction on our soil as an ADVANTAGE to them. They actually hope we get attacked because power is more important to them than safety. You're not even attempting to address the actual topic.

LISTEN TO THE MINDSET. They want this nation to be further crippled solely because they want to hold onto power.



Quoted for truth.

Repeated because it needs to be.

Over and over and over again.


AMEN

America needs to wake the fuck up because McSame=WWIII, and we are the losers.
CrackHead_Fan
How is this statement any different than Democrats hoping the economy doesn't turn around before November? Or that we get bad news in Iraq?
NoName
Quote: Originally posted by CrackHead_Fan
How is this statement any different than Democrats hoping the economy doesn't turn around before November? Or that we get bad news in Iraq?
Post the quotes of a leading Democrat that said that.
CrackHead_Fan
Quote: Originally posted by NoName
Post the quotes of a leading Democrat that said that.


Oh come on...can we be honest on here or not? The fact is, there are certain events that will either help or hurt each party's chances of winning the White House in November. Among these are:

1. The economy - if it gets significantly better, Democrats lose quite-possibly their biggest issue. If it gets worse, Democrats gain.
2. Iraq - any good news out of Iraq is bad news for Obama's chance of winning. Conversely, bad news is bad for McCain.
3. Terrorism - a terrorist attack between now and November could galvanize votes for McCain, as he is stronger on this issue and it would remind voters that there are still dangers out there that need to be dealt with.

Like if Osama bin Laden is captured or killed before the election, it helps McCain. All Democrats would be able to say is, "Why did it take so long?"
acefree
Quote: Originally posted by CrackHead_Fan
Oh come on...can we be honest on here or not? The fact is, there are certain events that will either help or hurt each party's chances of winning the White House in November. Among these are:

1. The economy - if it gets significantly better, Democrats lose quite-possibly their biggest issue. If it gets worse, Democrats gain.
2. Iraq - any good news out of Iraq is bad news for Obama's chance of winning. Conversely, bad news is bad for McCain.
3. Terrorism - a terrorist attack between now and November could galvanize votes for McCain, as he is stronger on this issue and it would remind voters that there are still dangers out there that need to be dealt with.

Like if Osama bin Laden is captured or killed before the election, it helps McCain. All Democrats would be able to say is, "Why did it take so long?"


all true. but how dumb does the mccain camp have to be to actually say it?
its-just-a-ride
Quote: Originally posted by CrackHead_Fan
How is this statement any different than Democrats hoping the economy doesn't turn around before November? Or that we get bad news in Iraq?


There are certain things that politicians and their associates cannot be heard to say even though everyone thinks them... like 9/11 could be seen as America's chicken's comin home to roost... (even though i've seen CIA officials saying the same thing)...

I don't think there's anything wrong with talking honestly about what will help / hinder the candidates... however, the guy that brought it up is dirty as hell and has a track record of being a scumbag - whatever he does, fuck him! He only does dirty politics.

Your Ad Here

Powered by: Search Engine Indexer and vBulletin v2.3.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2002, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
All code and concepts property of iMonkey Inc.

This website is not affiliated with the Howard Stern Show. It is produced by fans for fans.
We share no connection with Howard Stern, Sirius Radio, On Demand, CBS Broadcasting, E! TV or Infinity Broadcasting.

All posts and attachments are the responsibilities of their owners and not of this site.