Howard is pro- Gun Control.

Why????What's Ur beef?

I will never understand people you use literal translations of documents written looooooooooong loooooooooooooong ago like your constitiution and the fucking Bible. why can't you instill some common sense?

Oh okay, because when Reagan got shot a SS guy didn't bust out an Uzi or anything right? Again, don't let the facts get in the way douche bag.





Oh that that looks like a 10 round mag in the M16.

Is there any other civilized nation more obsessed with owning a gun and shooting people than the USA? What's to be prould about a right like that? It means you need to protect yourself because the system you cherish so much and defend against the rest of the world doesn't work. Otherwise you would not need to protect yourself.

How has he become "The Man".He's said years ago that he owns a gun. It just sounds like he's not like one of those maniac Right Wing freaks that believes everyone including babies should own as many guns and ammo as they want.

He got you there.

I am shocked that this discussion has not addressed the reality of gun existence.

How can you not be in favor of gun control?

How can you not realize the definition of gun control?

Gun Crime needs harsh capital punishment.
Citizens who feel the need to have a firearm should be able to legally own weapons and protect themselves.
And take a clear risk.
I have no use for a firearm at all.
Guns will never go away. When can we define the realities? Why is it so hard to understand?

thanks for playing, idiot...please show us the alternate US Constitution u've written and seek to implement.

oh, look who's a fukn idiot! hey idiot, history has taught us all that power corrupts, and our nation was fortunate enough to be founded by men who understood that Power can not and must not ever be trusted. the Founding Fathers of the USA created the template for Free Societies the world over, and their writings have not been improved upon. ALL free societies owe their existence to the USA and the Founders of it...and the extent to which any society deviates from the Founders is the extent to which that society is NOT free.

thanks for playing, and FAIL.

Howard is an elitist who exploits populism...Howard has no moral or intellectual authority on the Rights that belong to all Americans. today Howard even endorsed the tyranny of the FCC against himself, an unprecedented disgrace on his part.

try choosing a single side of ur mouth to speak from. gun control is unconstitutional, is anathema to freedom, and it also doesn't work at reducing crime. "gun control" distorts society by suppressing the mass of law-abiding citizens and amplifying the social influence of cops n criminals.

"gun control" is a recent love of progressives, but it is an ancient love of tyrants and oligarchs. it favors the Few over the Many.

gun-control is also (thankfully) almost dead in American politics. it must be fully destroyed or it will return like any respectable Eternal Evil.

Nice deflection and rambling post full of inane bullshit. Amazing how one person (even with a little to do with your time as you do) can spend so much time talking about shit they have no clue on. Keep up the good work there welfare queen.

So now the guy in the SUV in the car 15 feet in front of the limo is a "Snipper"? That would be the guy with the AR by the way. M-16 is a military designation not used by the Secret Service. Thanks I didn't think you could get any dumber.

"deflection" is ur projection, u weaselly cunt. *I* started this thread, making the point that Howard has finally outed himself as hostile to the 1st and 2nd Amendment, supporting "restrictions" (aka infringements). what *U* have to say, no one has a fukn clue...including urself.

"i got shot, i have a ccw, howard's right n Thomas Jefferson was wrong...n howard scammed a gun license on ronnie's behalf"...that's u in a nutshell, u shitstain.

You're just a fucking idiot. It's called a typo, quit harping on it to deflect. Did I call the guy in the SUV a sniper? No, I just pointed out his gun. I'm just going to put you on ignore. You are beyond a douche bag. I proved my point that's all I needed to do with you.

^^ look who's flailing now. he refuted u, u shitstain...go on, attack his spelling n civilian vs military designations.

More of nothing. I'm shocked.

OK pole smoker. You re right and everyone else is wrong. I will just have to take comfort in the fact that I made more money in the time I spent arguing with you than you will make this year. (not counting your welfare and foodstamps of course)

Typical internet douchetard. Spout a bunch of bullshit. When your proven incorrect, claim victory and bail. Nice playing with you JR. See you next time you surface spouting more bullshit on another subject.

You're a massive fucking douche and each comment you make is more useless than the last.

You fail to acknowledge reality. You cannot define gun ownership as a freedom of existence. You are essentially saying that anyone has the right to own a firearm. Bi-Polar, depressed, paranoid etc have due right to own a firearm.
Just as anyone sane and of merit.

You continue to argue a flawed reality.

You responded to a comment about the weapons snipers use by pointing out the weapons used by people who are not snipers. Ignore him all you like, he isn't deflecting, he's calling out the flaw in your argument.

It's not just the gun issue, that's just one of the many bullshit "show biz" lines of crap he spews. He's the biggest Bloviator in New York.

I agree with the Jeton on this issue. I would think a lot of gays may want to carry weapons to deter violence against them. A concealed weapon permit probably does more to limit queer stomping than any hate crime statute ever did.

No, my comment was that "when they protect him with 1 hand gun with 1o rounds etc...", I then said I saw 10 snipers, he responded that snipers only have 10 rounds. I posted a pic of a guy in an SUV with an M4 with a 30 round magazine. Reread, I know it's confusing since this is a mult account, but you'll figure it out.

Yes, I agree, the pink pistols!

ur only contribution to this thread is an oblique self-aggrandizement. my point stands in the first post. now eat shit.

^^ angry, anonymous and full of shit. welcome, troll.

u suck at straw-man arguments, u should hone them b4 attempting them. barring a legal declaration of mental incompetence or imminent danger to self or others, there is no Constitutional justification for gun control. it is rightfully being buried by the American body politic...that process is well under way.

while offering no actual argument of his own, only some demented bragging.

well said.

That AR-15 has been modified and probably fires burst and fully automatic , you are right about the M-16's but law enforcement officers including prison watch tower guards all modify the AR-15's to work like a M4 or M-16

I can see you're all as dumb as I remember.

Gun control =/= gun elimination

Yeah, America should totally be like the wild West and we should all carry a million guns at all times. But why stop there? Why don't we get access to tanks and missiles? I mean, why not? Hell, we should also be able to purchase napalm, because who knows when the government try to take our property and we'll need napalm? We should have guns that are five guns combined and shoots a billion bullets.

You know, for hunting. The same kind of hunting you do if hoodies frighten you.