Attract women like Bagger
  1. If you don't have an account click the "login or signup" tab in the upper right & create one. To make things easy you can quickly create it using your facebook, twitter, or google login. Your real identity & your login credentials for those sites will remain private. Just be sure to choose an alias when you set it up. PS: Even if you haven't been to SFN in years, your old login will still work.

Impeach Bush

Discussion in 'Politics' started by FatesWebb, Jul 3, 2006.

Page 12 of 21

  1. SDLaw06 Full Member


    It was a joke FW, I have failed :mad:
    SDLaw06, Jul 20, 2006
    #276

  2. Stickman Full Member

    Dr. Jones coined the phrase "cold fusion." He has a very impressive vita.
    Stickman, Jul 20, 2006
    #277

  3. FatesWebb Full Member

    yeah I know, but you also set me up for my joke, that article which is actually cool!
    FatesWebb, Jul 20, 2006
    #278

  4. SDLaw06 Full Member

    So are you saying that biologically speaking there are no ostriches in America, I honestly don't know. I'm tired. :bf:
    SDLaw06, Jul 20, 2006
    #279

  5. NC-Stern-Mark Full Member

    Ever try an Emu burger?


    Tasty!
    NC-Stern-Mark, Jul 20, 2006
    #280

  6. FatesWebb Full Member

    nah they are not native to the region, unless you count the press

    [IMG]

    or some citizens
    [IMG]
    FatesWebb, Jul 20, 2006
    #281

  7. FatesWebb Full Member

    FatesWebb, Jul 20, 2006
    #282

  8. profoundnotions Full Member

    NC-Stern-Mark

    have you ever seen loose change? it is said that jet fuel can only burn at max 1700 F. the steel in the WTC was built to withstand temperatures up to a max of 2400. the only way jet fuel gets up to 1700 F is if it burns for a long period of time with a continuous amount of fuel.

    i think everyone should watch loose change. its on google video. it explains a lot in an hour and a half
    profoundnotions, Jul 20, 2006
    #283

  9. Billyfromsphily Full Member

    It doesn't have to melt steel to have a collapse Ther structure was unique in design and structure. The floors were hung from th eouter walls The outer structure was compromised by the crash and subsequent fires that helped top weaken the supports that held the floors.
    we all would like to hang Bush for this, but this is an administration that was on vacaation something like 200 days in the first year......When did he have time to orchestrate this?????
    He is too fucking lazy!!!
    Billyfromsphily, Jul 20, 2006
    #284

  10. profoundnotions Full Member

    the building was designed to withstand an airplane crashing into it
    profoundnotions, Jul 20, 2006
    #285

  11. FatesWebb Full Member

    FatesWebb, Jul 20, 2006
    #286

  12. FatesWebb Full Member

    bush is just a puppet!!

    The steel supports were embedded in concrete, which was fault tolerant to the steel. why do you think there was so much dust, it wasnt all steel!
    FatesWebb, Jul 20, 2006
    #287

  13. FatesWebb Full Member

    [IMG]

    I think they did a better job of imploding wtc7 than they did the sands hotel

    look at this because this shows the thermal pockets under the wtc ground zero weeks after the attacks

    Thermal pockets CLICK HERE

    Jet fuel cant do this, this is the pools of molten
    FatesWebb, Jul 20, 2006
    #288

  14. Stickman Full Member

    No one said Bush did anything other than read about a pet goat. Cheney was the president that day. He was in the PEOC.
    Stickman, Jul 20, 2006
    #289

  15. Billyfromsphily Full Member

    But not the weakening of the hangers by the fire. Not the melting of them, The weakening!
    Billyfromsphily, Jul 21, 2006
    #290

  16. NC-Stern-Mark Full Member


    No, Not a 240,000 pound plane carrying 10,000 gallons of fuel and traveling at over 500 MPH. No building was ever designed for that.


    Only three buildings in the world have ever been struck by fuel-laden jets travels at over 500 MPH. The 2 WTC buildings collapsed as well as a section of the Pentagon. That's no surprise. Many reputable engineers were amazed they didn't fall immediately.
    NC-Stern-Mark, Jul 21, 2006
    #291

  17. Stickman Full Member

    Why don't you just admit you have no fucking clue what you're talking about? It happened before 9/11. It happened after 9/11. The difference of course is that in all other plane crashes besides 9/11 pieces were recovered and serial numbers were photographed. Why didn't this happen on 9/11?
    Stickman, Jul 21, 2006
    #292

  18. FatesWebb Full Member

    CIA- never mind, I have no proof to this claim, since it is a secret... continue on, I have taken this claim out of the thread. sorry. anything I dont have proof of I will remove!

    FW
    FatesWebb, Jul 21, 2006
    #293

  19. profoundnotions Full Member

    watch loose change trust me that will answer a lot of questions
    profoundnotions, Jul 21, 2006
    #294

  20. tourette_ticker Full Member

    GW was at high levels in the CIA? I know daddy Bush was, but this is new to me. Link please?
    tourette_ticker, Jul 21, 2006
    #295

  21. tourette_ticker Full Member

    In the mid 1960. They didn't envision the types of planes that crashed into the towers full of fuel.
    tourette_ticker, Jul 21, 2006
    #296

  22. FatesWebb Full Member

    you will continue to try to defend him, when he has it written all over his face! here is a plethera of proof against him

    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25051
    http://sun6.dms.state.fl.us/eog_new/eog/orders/2001/september/eo2001-261-09-07-01.html
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/12/16/wbush16.xml
    http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/091601/ter_124-7402.shtml
    http://web.archive.org/web/20011114215931/http:/www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_401406.html
    http://web.archive.org/web/20010927...m/news/nationworld/world/la-092701genoa.story
    http://web.archive.org/web/20011109171427/http:/www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_443114.html
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/events/newsnight/1645527.stm
    http://web.archive.org/web/20020806.../sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,52913,00.html
    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2002/05/16/MN177958.DTL
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-04-18-norad_x.htm
    http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ed...rticles/2004/09/21/bushs_passion_for_secrecy/
    http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20011128/
    http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ed...rticles/2004/09/21/bushs_passion_for_secrecy/
    http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200602160841.asp
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...ml&sSheet=/portal/2004/04/04/ixportaltop.html
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/15/attack/main509096.shtml
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/15/attack/main509096.shtml
    http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/11/27/intelligence.probe/index.html
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/12/12/politics/main532794.shtml
    http://web.archive.org/web/20030201090108/http:/www.fortune.com/fortune/print/0,15935,410237,00.html
    http://web.archive.org/web/20040603.../low_res/story.jsp?story=515270&host=3&dir=70
    http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/29/bush.911.commission/
    http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/29/bush.911.commission/
    http://www.cfr.org/publication.html?id=4049
    http://www.news.cornell.edu/releases/Oct04/terrorist.Bush.ssl.html
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4585010/
    http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/10/oneill.bush/index.html
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/4354269.stm
    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/06/p...6a0310ce1&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
    http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/06/18/bush.radio/
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/06/20050618.html
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4849744.stm
    http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/06/iraq.wmd.report/
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3718150.stm
    http://web.archive.org/web/20030315...sections/nightline/DailyNews/pnac_030310.html
    http://newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm
    http://www.defenselink.mil/specials/secdef_histories/bios/cheney.htm
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/w...ode=&contentId=A25406-2003Mar14&notFound=true
    http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch1.htm
    http://www.sptimes.com/2002/09/08/news_pf/911/The_drama_in_Sarasota.shtml
    http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/bostonherald/218980981.html?did=218980981&FMT=ABS&FMTS=FT&desc=NET LIFE
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/special/attack/pages/where_article11.html
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/12/20011204-17.html
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020105-3.html
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020105-3.html
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/12/20011221-2.html
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2001/12/14/usat-inside-tape.htm


    how you gonna defend all that? each one puts more and more suspicion upon BUSH HIMSELF!
    FatesWebb, Jul 21, 2006
    #297

  23. tourette_ticker Full Member

    I'm not! I'm not going to read all of that!
    tourette_ticker, Jul 21, 2006
    #298

  24. FatesWebb Full Member

    ok - because there is more if you read all of that I can provide more proof... for now, do this...
    [IMG]
    FatesWebb, Jul 21, 2006
    #299

  25. tourette_ticker Full Member

    Why don't you try giving your best piece of evidence and we take a look at that? I just don't have the time to analyze all those links for what amounts to a recreational debate.
    tourette_ticker, Jul 21, 2006
    #300
Page 12 of 21

Share This Page