Judd Apatow's movie bombs, thanks to Howard

One Twelve Inc., holla!

Nobody gives a shit about Howard. People don't even watch AGT now that he's on. And most of his fans actually hate him.

I don't care if Howard only has 5 listeners left. I love him and I love the show. What is fucking wrong with some of you guys that you let what the ratings are affect your enjoyment of the best rdio show ever? Sheesh...want some cheese with that wine?

Of course most people don't watch Howard on AGT.

AGT with Howard premieres May 14.

Today is April 29.

All people who are currently not watching AGT are not watching it because of Howard.

you mean 2900.

If only Howard would have had the star of the movie in studio then the apatow movie might have done as well as the Raven did in theatres. Nothing says box office success like opening in 7th place.

Why didn't you like The 40 Year Old Virgin and what do you consider a good funny movie?

I just got home from this 5 Year Engagement.
The Worst.
Jason Segel should be dragged into the town square and strung up.

Apatow has made some great films. If you bat .300 in movie making you're doing great, all you jealous fucks are hilarious.

That's funny . I think the movie looks awful, as Howard said and I was thinking Jason Segal doesn't look like a star. It's the same movie they've made a million times. Jason Segal looks like an accountant . But your right howie ruined it.

And the only reason Avatar and Titanic were so successful was because Howard didn't tell people to not watch those 2 movies. Boy, had he said anything negative those 2 movies would have tanked. Don't mess with Howard.

Howard was saying that Three Stooges was good, but it did NOT do well in the boxoffice either.

I think this is going to be a bad summer for Hollywood.

Are you delusional? Avatar and Titanic did well because of the hype machine behind them and that many people kept going back to see the movie, as with Hunger Games. Howard doesn't have that kind of pull, that's only his hype and the fools who go along with it.

If Howard ruined this movie for Apatow, then Apatow should NEVER speak to Howard or say a word about him again. Cut him off like Stamos and few others have. If Howard is the "kiss of death", then you shouldn't put your mouth on him.

Oh, Lord. Is your tounge up Howard's ass as we speak?

Flops eh? If you are considering Five Year Engagement a Judd Apatow film then you have to consider Bridemaids one as well--criterion being he is EP. And yeah, that was no bomb at all. Five Year Engagement had a budget of $30 million so it's going to be pretty easy to be a break even flick--maybe even a small profit, which is great by hollywood standards.

If it does more than Private Parts, will Howard call it a bomb??

Or keep his CBS Saturday night show on the air in the late 90s/early 2000s which I thought was the most telling sign his fan clout was overrated and greatly exaggerated by Howard and KROCK at the time.

Also SNL was in really bad shape at that time and knee deep in it's worst seasons and Howard STILL couldn't pull a coup. But like everything he does post BethOno it was an embarrassingly lazy cut and paste of the E show with a little fancy editing slipped in. Howard will never admit to bad ratings even there, he'll most likely say Moonves/CBS didn't support it and/or didn't pay anything.

The Saturday night CBS show is a very understated failure on Howard's resume' that doesn't get brought up nearly enough.

Howard's private parts was not a success. It came out in March, earned 14 million the first week lost to Tim Allen (jungle Boy or something). Even after Howard hyped the movie everyday. Bad acting and Bad wigs doesn't make a good movie....

Is that really John Hein on there? Who the hell would spend their spare time writing reviews on Flixster?

Seems a little much. Just a little.

at 8 bucks a ticket, who is going to see this??? just wait until it is released on DVD or out on cable...