Not your typical 9/11 truth thread READ THE RULES PLZ

Try explaining the words "serially charged"? Its obvious that they are not your own.

You asked a fair question, so I'll give you a fair answer...

"What makes you think I don't know both sides?"
-Your attitude toward providing accurate facts from reputible sources.

"What are the chances that i'm more familiar with the 9/11 Commission Report than you are?"
-100%. However, I believe that when reviewing the report, like most people you only paid attention to the information that backs up your theory.

"What about NIST, FEMA and Congressional Hearings?"
-Again, pretty good. I am not here to say that I have the answers. That is the difference between you and I. You claim to have all the answers, but most of your sources are unreliable at best, and straight up bullshit at worst. I, on the other hand, claim to know nothing, and am trying to look at the situation with clear and unbiased eyes. If your arguments don't hold up to such scrutiny, then your theory is weak. Not necessarily wrong, just weak.

But a heap of stories is all you have. Maybe it is because you simply do not understand, but you haven't backed up what you said. {Insurance payment} - {initial down payment} does not equal {profit}. Those are a couple of line items in the cash flow analysis, but that's it.

And even if he made $42 gazillion that doesn't mean he was behind anything. In fact, unless you now have the insurance companies in on your little plan the fact he was paid so much proves that he was not complicit in this act. Don't you think they would love to save the couple of B by proving his guilt?

cough cought *backtrack* cough cough

The cases aren't entirely settled yet and teh scumbag is trying to milk every cent, believe it.

I'm not asking for you to shut up, only provide reliable information from reliable and/or peer-reviewed sources. I don't believe that this is too much to ask. Did you not learn the scientific method in grammar school?

By the way, I applaud your efforts. If there is something to be uncovered it needs to be done, and it is going to be people like you that uncover it. However, you can't demolish your house to kill a fly, and you can't make unprovable statements in an effort to prove others false.

By doing this you are just as bad as the officials that provide us with no information.

why would we believe you? You have no idea about how the deal was put together and how it is structured and what the loss profit statement annually is.

You again are espousing your limited capacity opinion!

Artie, what has he uncovered that is original? Its all cut and paste !

Do you have a reading comprehension problem? Where is the backtrack? I used the $42 whateverthefucknumberIsaid number because you have yet to show what his profit was. But then I'm guessing you can't because despite what you said, you just don't know.

*nods* maybe so.... I said people like him, not him necessarily.

I've thanked lots of people on here who have pointed out inaccuracies in what I've said. I think the process of checking sources is very important.

As I've said before, if even half of what I've posted is accurate...

It does seem that a lot of people on here take this very personally. There is a very violent reaction when you shake peoples' belief system and force them to look at something as tragic as 9/11 and then tell them to reconsider what they've been told.

It's a shock, I experienced it. You might not believe it, but it wasn't until someone forced me to research this stuff that I started questioning the official story.

Sorry to shake people out of their comfort zone but there has to be a better explanation for the collapse of the towers and the lack of plane wreckage than what the gov't has provided.

Get over yourself. You have done nothing to shake people out of their comfort zone. All you have accomplished to do is illustrate that a cult of loons exists. Good job. It's clear by the loon agenda that you're not looking for truth. You people continually post fake science, misleading quotes, and amatuer You Tube links of fake science and misleading quotes. You don't think this tactic is transparent to anyone with a half of brain? Please, you suck at convincing anyone and if you think you're making people question "the official story" you're loonier than I think you are.

What this post needs is more uses of the word 'loon.'

Snoop, you have shown time and again you know nothing from nothing so you should really just fade away and read a book and try not to let your lips move while doing so.

Good luck.

Again, you haven't a clue as to what the official story even is so you should bow out as gracefully as you can. If you are so against people examining the events than stay out of the thread. If you like the pabum that is being served to you than go feed somewhere else LOON.

Your right stick, you can never have enough of the loon modifier when the subject is you or fates or conspiracists. Its the perfect word!

For someone who pretends to be objective, you sure do make a lot of assumptions.

- You regularly accuse me of providing bad sources only because you don't recognize the source. For example, you said defenselink wasn't a legit source, when it turned out to be the DoD.

- You would actually have to know what's in the Commission Report for you to determine if I cherry picked what I wanted out of it. You're wrong on both counts. Again you'd have to read the book to know what you're talking about

- Quote me saying I have all the answers.

You seem much brighter than a lot of idiots on here, so please try to be accurate by using quotes, refuting my info with evidence and sources, and please before judging my research, actually follow the links and know what you're talking about before accusing me of anything.

I know you're tired of this shit because I have an inexhaustable list of 9/11 anamolies. That's why you quickly tried to shut down this thread. It makes no difference, these threads aren't going away anytime soon.

Its starting to happen !! stickman is trying to change arties rules!!!

Pretty soon artie will be a scumbag doushebag by stickmans standards!

These threads may not go away, but they will always turn into shit because of stickman and his ego!

No, if I call someone a douchebag, I spell it correctly. Then I proofread my sentences so as not to appear illiterate.

The proper punctuation for possession is really not that hard to master.

You have to be illiterate to consider using it in the first place JERKOFF !

can we get back on track here?

did you guys know that there was a series that started on fox 6 months prior to the attacks, known as the lone gunman, and the plot was the us government flying planes into the world trade center and blaming it on terrorists?



must have been pure coincidence I suppose...

Aug 30 - Dept of Transportation conducts exercise involving high-jacked plane and a cell phone from it among other aspects of the scenario that one participants describes as being 'very strange' when the actual event happened on 9/11.
http://transweb.sjsu.edu/mtiportal/...uments/terrorism/Terrorism Symposium 2001.htm

Sept '01 - 25,000 British troops ensemble in Oman near Afghanistan for 'Operation Swift Sword' and will help US in attacking OBL.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1012044.stm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/10/01/wmil101.xml

9/11 - Donald Rumsfeld predicts terrorist attack in US 2 minutes before 1st WTC plane crash, later predicts Pentagon crash minutes prior.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/12/16/wbush16.xml

President's cousin escaped death at wtc thanks to schedule change the day before...
http://web.archive.org/web/20011114215931/http:/www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_401406.html

Coincidence!